Mega-Sporting events and the politics of nation-building: a comparison of the 2010 South African and the 2014 and 2016 Brazilian cases

IF 0.1 Q4 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM International Sports Studies Pub Date : 2021-11-09 DOI:10.30819/iss.43-1.02
Hoyoon Jung
{"title":"Mega-Sporting events and the politics of nation-building: a comparison of the 2010 South African and the 2014 and 2016 Brazilian cases","authors":"Hoyoon Jung","doi":"10.30819/iss.43-1.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n It is widely acknowledged that mega-sporting events play a powerful role in nationbuilding\nin their host countries, and many scholars have empirically demonstrated this\nrelationship. The 2010 South Africa FIFA World Cup provided a potent vehicle through\nwhich national unity and integration could be successfully promoted. However, more\nrecent Brazilian experiences in the 2014 FIFA World Cup and the 2016 Olympics\nproved that an identical outcome is not always the case. This study examines how the\nhosting of mega-sporting events in South Africa and Brazil yielded contrasting effects\non nation-building. Events in these two countries are compared to explore how two\nanalogous societies that hosted mega-sporting events at a similar time ultimately\nexperienced completely different outcomes. It is argued that differences in the cost of\nthese mega-events, different economic circumstances and, differences in the\ncharacteristics and impact of social movements in the two countries were major\ncontributing factors to the divergence.\n\n","PeriodicalId":40315,"journal":{"name":"International Sports Studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Sports Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30819/iss.43-1.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It is widely acknowledged that mega-sporting events play a powerful role in nationbuilding in their host countries, and many scholars have empirically demonstrated this relationship. The 2010 South Africa FIFA World Cup provided a potent vehicle through which national unity and integration could be successfully promoted. However, more recent Brazilian experiences in the 2014 FIFA World Cup and the 2016 Olympics proved that an identical outcome is not always the case. This study examines how the hosting of mega-sporting events in South Africa and Brazil yielded contrasting effects on nation-building. Events in these two countries are compared to explore how two analogous societies that hosted mega-sporting events at a similar time ultimately experienced completely different outcomes. It is argued that differences in the cost of these mega-events, different economic circumstances and, differences in the characteristics and impact of social movements in the two countries were major contributing factors to the divergence.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大型体育赛事和国家建设的政治:2010年南非与2014年和2016年巴西案例的比较
人们普遍认为,大型体育赛事在东道国的国家建设中发挥着强大的作用,许多学者已经通过实证证明了这种关系。2010年南非世界杯提供了一个强有力的载体,通过它可以成功地促进国家团结和融合。然而,最近巴西在2014年世界杯和2016年奥运会上的经历证明,结果并不总是一样的。这项研究考察了在南非和巴西举办大型体育赛事如何对国家建设产生不同的影响。将这两个国家的赛事进行比较,以探索两个相似的社会在相似的时间举办大型体育赛事,最终如何经历完全不同的结果。有人认为,这些大型事件的成本差异、不同的经济环境以及两国社会运动的特征和影响的差异是造成这种差异的主要因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Sports Studies
International Sports Studies HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
期刊介绍: International Sports Studies (ISS) is a scholarly journal in the field of physical education and sport with a unique focus. Its aim is to advance understanding and communication between members of the global community who share a professional, personal or scholarly interest in the state and development of physical education and sport around the world. International Sports Studies (ISS) is today without paradigmatic prejudice and reflects an eclectic approach to the task of understanding physical education and sport in the contemporary world. It asks only that its contributors can add to knowledge about international physical education and sport studies through studies involving comparisons between regional, national and international settings or by providing unique insights into specific national and local phenomena which contribute to an understanding that can be shared across as well as within national borders.
期刊最新文献
Quality Physical Education Perceptions Among PE Professionals: an Exploratory Factor Analysis Understanding Quality Physical Education from the Perspective of Asian PE Professionals The Perception of Quality Physical Education in China Voices from PE Professionals in Mindanao: Expectations Underlying Quality Physical Education Development Quality Physical Education (QPE) Measurement Tool Development
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1