The Effect of Using Ultrasonography Device Integrated with Artificial Intelligence on Imaging the Injection Area in Peripheral Nerve Block Applications

Q4 Medicine Anestezi Dergisi Pub Date : 2023-01-30 DOI:10.54875/jarss.2023.24381
G. Erdem, Yasemin Ermiş, D. Özkan
{"title":"The Effect of Using Ultrasonography Device Integrated with Artificial Intelligence on Imaging the Injection Area in Peripheral Nerve Block Applications","authors":"G. Erdem, Yasemin Ermiş, D. Özkan","doi":"10.54875/jarss.2023.24381","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: New devices and software have brought about benefits such as easing the burden of clinicians, preventing time losses and increasing their professional satisfaction. In this study, we aimed to present the effect of the use of artificial intelligence integrated ultrasonography (USG) on the imaging of the injection site in peripheral nerve block applications and the point of view of the clinicians. Methods: In the study, following ethics committee’s approval, 40 volunteer Anesthesiology and Reanimation doctors working in Health Sciences University Dışkapı Yıldırım Beyazıt Education and Training Hospital performed selected regional blocks (infraclavicular and PECS) accompanied by conventional USG and artificial intelligence integrated-USG (Nerveblox), and the block area imaging times were recorded. Subsequently, questionnaires about these experiences were distributed and 14 closed-ended questions were asked. In the comparison made according to the physicians’ imaging times of the determined block areas, the t test for independent samples was used, and the statistical significance level was established as p<0.001. Results: There is a significant difference in favor of the use of artificial intelligence integrated-USG in the comparison of the time taken by the physicians participating in the survey to find infraclavicular and PECS blocks reference area with conventional and artificial intelligence integrated-USG (p<0.001). Conclusion: It has been proven in our study that artificial intelligence algorithms will continue to increase and will be one of the important components of diagnostic USG in the coming years. Keywords: Peripheral nerve blocks, ultrasonography, artificial intelligence","PeriodicalId":36000,"journal":{"name":"Anestezi Dergisi","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anestezi Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54875/jarss.2023.24381","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: New devices and software have brought about benefits such as easing the burden of clinicians, preventing time losses and increasing their professional satisfaction. In this study, we aimed to present the effect of the use of artificial intelligence integrated ultrasonography (USG) on the imaging of the injection site in peripheral nerve block applications and the point of view of the clinicians. Methods: In the study, following ethics committee’s approval, 40 volunteer Anesthesiology and Reanimation doctors working in Health Sciences University Dışkapı Yıldırım Beyazıt Education and Training Hospital performed selected regional blocks (infraclavicular and PECS) accompanied by conventional USG and artificial intelligence integrated-USG (Nerveblox), and the block area imaging times were recorded. Subsequently, questionnaires about these experiences were distributed and 14 closed-ended questions were asked. In the comparison made according to the physicians’ imaging times of the determined block areas, the t test for independent samples was used, and the statistical significance level was established as p<0.001. Results: There is a significant difference in favor of the use of artificial intelligence integrated-USG in the comparison of the time taken by the physicians participating in the survey to find infraclavicular and PECS blocks reference area with conventional and artificial intelligence integrated-USG (p<0.001). Conclusion: It has been proven in our study that artificial intelligence algorithms will continue to increase and will be one of the important components of diagnostic USG in the coming years. Keywords: Peripheral nerve blocks, ultrasonography, artificial intelligence
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人工智能超声成像装置在周围神经阻滞注射区成像中的应用
目的:新的设备和软件带来了减轻临床医生负担、防止时间损失和提高他们的职业满意度等好处。在这项研究中,我们旨在介绍人工智能集成超声(USG)在周围神经阻滞应用中对注射部位成像的影响以及临床医生的观点。方法:在这项研究中,在伦理委员会批准后,在健康科学大学DışkapıYıldırım Beyazıt教育培训医院工作的40名志愿麻醉学和苏醒医生在常规USG和人工智能集成USG(Nervebox)的陪同下进行了选定的区域阻滞(锁骨下和PECS),并且记录块区域成像时间。随后,分发了关于这些经历的问卷,并提出了14个封闭式问题。在根据医生对确定的闭塞区域的成像时间进行的比较中,使用了独立样本的t检验,统计显著性水平确定为p<0.001。结果:参与调查的医生发现锁骨下和PECS块参考区的时间与传统的和人工智能集成的USG相比,有利于使用人工智能集成USG的时间有显著差异(p<0.001)将继续增加,并将在未来几年成为诊断性USG的重要组成部分之一。关键词:周围神经阻滞,超声检查,人工智能
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Anestezi Dergisi
Anestezi Dergisi Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
期刊最新文献
Perioperative Hypothermia and Associated Factors: A Prospective Cohort Study Evaluation of the Knowledge, Skills and Practices on Rapid Sequence Intubation of Physicians Working in Anesthesiology and Reanimation Clinics in Turkey: Survey Study Indispensable for Anesthesia and Intensive Care Units: End-Tidal Carbon Dioxide and Capnography: A Bibliometric Analysis during 1980-2022 Inadequancy and Differences about the Attitudes in Pain Control of Cancer Patients: Assessment of Algology Department Acute Hepatic Injury Following Cardiac Surgery: Retrospective Observational Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1