Exploitation of deep learning in the automatic detection of cracks on paved roads

Q3 Social Sciences Geomatica Pub Date : 2019-06-01 DOI:10.1139/geomat-2019-0008
W. Jung, F. Naveed, Baoxin Hu, Jianguo Wang, Ning Li
{"title":"Exploitation of deep learning in the automatic detection of cracks on paved roads","authors":"W. Jung, F. Naveed, Baoxin Hu, Jianguo Wang, Ning Li","doi":"10.1139/geomat-2019-0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the advance of deep learning networks, their applications in the assessment of pavement conditions are gaining more attention. A convolutional neural network (CNN) is the most commonly used network in image classification. In terms of pavement assessment, most existing CNNs are designed to only distinguish between cracks and non-cracks. Few networks classify cracks in different levels of severity. Information on the severity of pavement cracks is critical for pavement repair services. In this study, the state-of-the-art CNN used in the detection of pavement cracks was improved to localize the cracks and identify their distress levels based on three categories (low, medium, and high). In addition, a fully convolutional network (FCN) was, for the first time, utilized in the detection of pavement cracks. These designed architectures were validated using the data acquired on four highways in Ontario, Canada, and compared with the ground truth that was provided by the Ministry of Transportation of Ontario (MTO). The results showed that with the improved CNN, the prediction precision on a series of test image patches were 72.9%, 73.9%, and 73.1% for cracks with the severity levels of low, medium, and high, respectively. The precision for the FCN was tested on whole pavement images, resulting in 62.8%, 63.3%, and 66.4%, respectively, for cracks with the severity levels of low, medium, and high. It is worth mentioning that the ground truth contained some uncertainties, which partially contributed to the relatively low precision.","PeriodicalId":35938,"journal":{"name":"Geomatica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1139/geomat-2019-0008","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geomatica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1139/geomat-2019-0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

With the advance of deep learning networks, their applications in the assessment of pavement conditions are gaining more attention. A convolutional neural network (CNN) is the most commonly used network in image classification. In terms of pavement assessment, most existing CNNs are designed to only distinguish between cracks and non-cracks. Few networks classify cracks in different levels of severity. Information on the severity of pavement cracks is critical for pavement repair services. In this study, the state-of-the-art CNN used in the detection of pavement cracks was improved to localize the cracks and identify their distress levels based on three categories (low, medium, and high). In addition, a fully convolutional network (FCN) was, for the first time, utilized in the detection of pavement cracks. These designed architectures were validated using the data acquired on four highways in Ontario, Canada, and compared with the ground truth that was provided by the Ministry of Transportation of Ontario (MTO). The results showed that with the improved CNN, the prediction precision on a series of test image patches were 72.9%, 73.9%, and 73.1% for cracks with the severity levels of low, medium, and high, respectively. The precision for the FCN was tested on whole pavement images, resulting in 62.8%, 63.3%, and 66.4%, respectively, for cracks with the severity levels of low, medium, and high. It is worth mentioning that the ground truth contained some uncertainties, which partially contributed to the relatively low precision.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
深度学习在路面裂缝自动检测中的应用
随着深度学习网络的发展,其在路面状况评估中的应用越来越受到关注。卷积神经网络(CNN)是图像分类中最常用的网络。在路面评估方面,大多数现有的细胞神经网络仅用于区分裂缝和非裂缝。很少有网络将裂缝划分为不同的严重程度。关于路面裂缝严重程度的信息对于路面维修服务至关重要。在这项研究中,对用于检测路面裂缝的最先进的CNN进行了改进,以定位裂缝,并根据三个类别(低、中和高)确定其破坏程度。此外,全卷积网络(FCN)首次用于路面裂缝的检测。使用在加拿大安大略省四条高速公路上获得的数据对这些设计的架构进行了验证,并与安大略省交通部(MTO)提供的地面实况进行了比较。结果表明,对于严重程度为低、中、高的裂纹,改进的CNN对一系列测试图像块的预测精度分别为72.9%、73.9%和73.1%。FCN的精度在整个路面图像上进行了测试,对于严重程度为低、中、高的裂缝,其精度分别为62.8%、63.3%和66.4%。值得一提的是,地面实况包含一些不确定性,这在一定程度上导致了相对较低的精度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Geomatica
Geomatica Social Sciences-Geography, Planning and Development
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
期刊介绍: Geomatica (formerly CISM Journal ACSGC), is the official quarterly publication of the Canadian Institute of Geomatics. It is the oldest surveying and mapping publication in Canada and was first published in 1922 as the Journal of the Dominion Land Surveyors’ Association. Geomatica is dedicated to the dissemination of information on technical advances in the geomatics sciences. The internationally respected publication contains special features, notices of conferences, calendar of event, articles on personalities, review of current books, industry news and new products, all of which keep the publication lively and informative.
期刊最新文献
Soil Salinity Mapping Using Remote Sensing and GIS A deep transfer learning-based damage assessment on post-event very high-resolution orthophotos Building detection using a dense attention network from LiDAR and image data Exploring five indicators for the quality of OpenStreetMap road networks: a case study of Québec, Canada Fonction d’appartenance et pouvoir d’expression topologique entre objets aux limites fixes et floues dans le processus d’affectation des terres au Gabon
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1