Waterfall and Agile information system project success rates – A South African perspective

Q3 Social Sciences South African Computer Journal Pub Date : 2020-07-22 DOI:10.18489/sacj.v32i1.683
L. Khoza, C. Marnewick
{"title":"Waterfall and Agile information system project success rates – A South African perspective","authors":"L. Khoza, C. Marnewick","doi":"10.18489/sacj.v32i1.683","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Software projects are still failing at an alarming rate and do not provide value to the organisation at large. This has been the case for the last decade. Software projects use predominantly Waterfall as a methodology. This raises the question whether new ways of working can be introduced to improve the success rate. One such new way is Agile as an approach to developing software. A survey was done to determine whether Agile projects are more successful than Waterfall projects, thus contrasting the old and the new ways of working. Some 617 software projects were evaluated to determine the success rate based on the methodology used. Success was measured on a continuum of five levels and not just the triple constraint. The results imply that Agile projects are more successful than Waterfall projects to some extent, but that there are still concerns that need to be addressed.","PeriodicalId":55859,"journal":{"name":"South African Computer Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Computer Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18489/sacj.v32i1.683","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Software projects are still failing at an alarming rate and do not provide value to the organisation at large. This has been the case for the last decade. Software projects use predominantly Waterfall as a methodology. This raises the question whether new ways of working can be introduced to improve the success rate. One such new way is Agile as an approach to developing software. A survey was done to determine whether Agile projects are more successful than Waterfall projects, thus contrasting the old and the new ways of working. Some 617 software projects were evaluated to determine the success rate based on the methodology used. Success was measured on a continuum of five levels and not just the triple constraint. The results imply that Agile projects are more successful than Waterfall projects to some extent, but that there are still concerns that need to be addressed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
瀑布和敏捷信息系统项目的成功率——一个南非的视角
软件项目仍以惊人的速度失败,无法为整个组织提供价值。过去十年一直是这样。软件项目主要使用Waterfall作为一种方法论。这就提出了一个问题,即是否可以引入新的工作方式来提高成功率。敏捷是一种新的软件开发方法。进行了一项调查,以确定敏捷项目是否比瀑布项目更成功,从而对比新旧工作方式。对大约617个软件项目进行了评估,以根据所使用的方法确定成功率。衡量成功的标准是五个层面,而不仅仅是三重约束。结果表明,在某种程度上,敏捷项目比瀑布项目更成功,但仍有一些问题需要解决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
South African Computer Journal
South African Computer Journal Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: The South African Computer Journal is specialist ICT academic journal, accredited by the South African Department of Higher Education and Training SACJ publishes research articles, viewpoints and communications in English in Computer Science and Information Systems.
期刊最新文献
Virtual learner experience (VLX) Editorial: A new era for SACJ Obituary – Conrad Mueller The Influence of Change Management Process on Cloud Transitioning Online Platform Privacy Policies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1