The Persistence of Morpheus: Redcrosse’s Carelessness

IF 0.4 2区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS MODERN PHILOLOGY Pub Date : 2023-02-01 DOI:10.1086/722597
W. A. Oram
{"title":"The Persistence of Morpheus: Redcrosse’s Carelessness","authors":"W. A. Oram","doi":"10.1086/722597","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Book 1 of The Faerie Queene constitutes Spenser’s most searching study of morbid sadness, which he associates with a wish for “careless” rest and, ultimately, for death. His account of Redcrosse’s disease makes use of medieval conceptions of acedia and Renaissance ideas of melancholy, but it diverges from both, as well as from modern conceptions of depression. From the opening stanza Spenser suggests that there are two Redcrosse knights, the one consciously aggressive and eager for glory, the other “too solemn sad,” desiring escape from the cares of the world. Spenser embodies this second impulse in the House of Morpheus. In the early cantos the Morpheus impulse remains accessible only in dream, but as Redcrosse deteriorates it becomes more dominant and more conscious. It next appears as Sans Joy, who undermines Redcrosse’s attempts at self-glorification in the House of Pride and who (despite the young knight’s seeming victory) forces him to recognize the emptiness of the ambition imaged in Lucifera’s palace. Having humiliatingly fled the House of Pride, Redcrosse allows himself to be seduced by Duessa to distract himself from his incipient despair—a despair he voices in Orgoglio’s dungeon as a desire for death. Despaire is the deadliest embodiment of the Morpheus impulse, no longer inchoate feeling but articulate sin. But Redcrosse’s experiences in the House of Holiness and afterward suggest that he will never in life lose this weight of grief, which is part of the human condition. Spenser revisits these attacks of morbid sorrow in later episodes of his epic.","PeriodicalId":45201,"journal":{"name":"MODERN PHILOLOGY","volume":"120 1","pages":"312 - 334"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MODERN PHILOLOGY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/722597","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Book 1 of The Faerie Queene constitutes Spenser’s most searching study of morbid sadness, which he associates with a wish for “careless” rest and, ultimately, for death. His account of Redcrosse’s disease makes use of medieval conceptions of acedia and Renaissance ideas of melancholy, but it diverges from both, as well as from modern conceptions of depression. From the opening stanza Spenser suggests that there are two Redcrosse knights, the one consciously aggressive and eager for glory, the other “too solemn sad,” desiring escape from the cares of the world. Spenser embodies this second impulse in the House of Morpheus. In the early cantos the Morpheus impulse remains accessible only in dream, but as Redcrosse deteriorates it becomes more dominant and more conscious. It next appears as Sans Joy, who undermines Redcrosse’s attempts at self-glorification in the House of Pride and who (despite the young knight’s seeming victory) forces him to recognize the emptiness of the ambition imaged in Lucifera’s palace. Having humiliatingly fled the House of Pride, Redcrosse allows himself to be seduced by Duessa to distract himself from his incipient despair—a despair he voices in Orgoglio’s dungeon as a desire for death. Despaire is the deadliest embodiment of the Morpheus impulse, no longer inchoate feeling but articulate sin. But Redcrosse’s experiences in the House of Holiness and afterward suggest that he will never in life lose this weight of grief, which is part of the human condition. Spenser revisits these attacks of morbid sorrow in later episodes of his epic.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
莫斐斯的坚持:雷德克罗斯的粗心
《仙后》的第一卷是斯宾塞对病态悲伤最深入的研究,他将这种悲伤与一种“漫不经心”的休息,最终是死亡的愿望联系在一起。他对雷德克罗斯疾病的描述使用了中世纪的绝望概念和文艺复兴时期的忧郁概念,但它与两者都有所不同,也与现代的抑郁概念有所不同。从第一节开始,斯宾塞就暗示有两个雷德克罗斯骑士,一个有意识地咄咄逼人,渴望荣耀,另一个“过于严肃悲伤”,渴望逃离尘世的烦恼。斯宾塞在《墨菲斯之家》中体现了这第二种冲动。在早期的章节中,睡眠冲动仍然只在梦中出现,但随着雷德克劳斯的恶化,它变得更加占主导地位,更加有意识。下一个角色是Sans Joy,他破坏了雷德克罗斯在“骄傲之家”中自我美化的企图,并且(尽管这位年轻的骑士表面上取得了胜利)迫使他认识到卢西弗拉宫殿中所描绘的雄心壮志是空虚的。在屈辱地逃离了骄傲之家后,雷德克罗斯让自己被杜莎引诱,以分散自己最初的绝望——他在奥格里奥的地牢里说出了一种对死亡的渴望。绝望是莫斐斯冲动最致命的化身,不再是幼稚的感觉,而是清晰的罪恶。但雷德克罗斯在神圣之家的经历以及之后的经历表明,他一生中永远无法摆脱这种悲伤的重压,这是人类状况的一部分。斯宾塞在他史诗的后几章中重新审视了这些病态悲伤的袭击。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
MODERN PHILOLOGY
MODERN PHILOLOGY Multiple-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
期刊介绍: Founded in 1903, Modern Philology sets the standard for literary scholarship, history, and criticism. In addition to innovative and scholarly articles (in English) on literature in all modern world languages, MP also publishes insightful book reviews of recent books as well as review articles and research on archival documents. Editor Richard Strier is happy to announce that we now welcome contributions on literature in non-European languages and contributions that productively compare texts or traditions from European and non-European literatures. In general, we expect contributions to be written in (or translated into) English, and we expect quotations from non-English languages to be translated into English as well as reproduced in the original.
期刊最新文献
:Black Shakespeare: Reading and Misreading Race :Pain, Penance, and Protest: Peine Forte et Dure in Medieval England :The Politics of Speech in Later Twentieth-Century Poetry: Local Tongues in Heaney, Brooks, Harrison, and Clifton :Melville, Beauty, and American Literary Studies: An Aesthetics in All Things :Heroic Awe: The Sublime and the Remaking of Renaissance Epic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1