Analysis of General Surgical Consultations Requested From The Emergency Department in the Period of Pandemic and Non-Pandemic

IF 0.3 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Konuralp Tip Dergisi Pub Date : 2021-03-11 DOI:10.18521/KTD.767493
S. Uludağ, Betül Güleryüz, A. Ipekci, A. Zengin, M. Ozcelik
{"title":"Analysis of General Surgical Consultations Requested From The Emergency Department in the Period of Pandemic and Non-Pandemic","authors":"S. Uludağ, Betül Güleryüz, A. Ipekci, A. Zengin, M. Ozcelik","doi":"10.18521/KTD.767493","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To investigate the emergency department admissions, the general surgery consultation request, and the necessity of immediate treatment of patients despite the fact that the society did not leave the house unless necessary during the pandemic period. Methods: The files of patients who admitted to the emergency department and whose general surgery consultation was requested due to urgent surgical treatment were retrospectively scanned between March-May 2020, which is the Covid 19 pandemic period and March-May 2019, as a time period in which normal social life continues. Age, gender, complaints, comorbid diseases, the necessity of truly emergency surgical treatment as well as the socioeconomic level scale for each individual were recorded and analyzed. Results: The rate of request for consultation was 2.7% (n = 170) in the pandemic period, and 3.1% (n = 316) in the non-pandemic period. In both periods, no statistically significant difference was found in the distribution of genders according to the treatment(p> 0.05). The complaints of the patients were similar in both periods, and the most common complaints were nausea-abdominal pain-difficulty defecation. Although individuals without comorbidities are predominant in both periods, the proportion of individuals with comorbid diseases was higher during the pandemic period (p = 0.001). Patients who did not require urgent treatment in both periods were in the majority. In patients requiring urgent treatment, the rate of the hospitalized patients was higher during the pandemic period, whereas the rate of the operated patients was higher in the non-pandemic period (p = 0.005). The majority of the patients had a low socioeconomic level and a small portion had a moderate socioeconomic level in both periods (p> 0.05). In addition, patients with a low socioeconomic level and 75 years of age or older who did not require urgent treatment were higher in the pandemic period (p = 0.002). Conclusion: Although there is a significant decrease in the number of emergency department admissions and the number of general surgical consultations requested during the pandemic period, the fact that more than half of the patients who are consulted do not require emergency surgical treatment still shows the unnecessary use of emergency services.","PeriodicalId":17884,"journal":{"name":"Konuralp Tip Dergisi","volume":"13 1","pages":"11-17"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Konuralp Tip Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18521/KTD.767493","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the emergency department admissions, the general surgery consultation request, and the necessity of immediate treatment of patients despite the fact that the society did not leave the house unless necessary during the pandemic period. Methods: The files of patients who admitted to the emergency department and whose general surgery consultation was requested due to urgent surgical treatment were retrospectively scanned between March-May 2020, which is the Covid 19 pandemic period and March-May 2019, as a time period in which normal social life continues. Age, gender, complaints, comorbid diseases, the necessity of truly emergency surgical treatment as well as the socioeconomic level scale for each individual were recorded and analyzed. Results: The rate of request for consultation was 2.7% (n = 170) in the pandemic period, and 3.1% (n = 316) in the non-pandemic period. In both periods, no statistically significant difference was found in the distribution of genders according to the treatment(p> 0.05). The complaints of the patients were similar in both periods, and the most common complaints were nausea-abdominal pain-difficulty defecation. Although individuals without comorbidities are predominant in both periods, the proportion of individuals with comorbid diseases was higher during the pandemic period (p = 0.001). Patients who did not require urgent treatment in both periods were in the majority. In patients requiring urgent treatment, the rate of the hospitalized patients was higher during the pandemic period, whereas the rate of the operated patients was higher in the non-pandemic period (p = 0.005). The majority of the patients had a low socioeconomic level and a small portion had a moderate socioeconomic level in both periods (p> 0.05). In addition, patients with a low socioeconomic level and 75 years of age or older who did not require urgent treatment were higher in the pandemic period (p = 0.002). Conclusion: Although there is a significant decrease in the number of emergency department admissions and the number of general surgical consultations requested during the pandemic period, the fact that more than half of the patients who are consulted do not require emergency surgical treatment still shows the unnecessary use of emergency services.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
疫情与非疫情期间急诊科普通外科会诊需求分析
目的:调查急诊科的入院情况、普通外科的咨询请求以及立即治疗患者的必要性,尽管在疫情期间,除非必要,否则社会不会离开家。方法:回顾性扫描2020年3月至5月(新冠肺炎19大流行期间)和2019年3月-5月(正常社会生活持续的时间段)期间因紧急手术治疗而入住急诊科并要求进行普通手术咨询的患者的档案。记录并分析了每个人的年龄、性别、投诉、共病、真正紧急手术治疗的必要性以及社会经济水平。结果:在疫情期间,咨询请求率为2.7%(n=170),在非疫情期间为3.1%(n=316)。在两个时期,根据治疗的性别分布没有统计学上的显著差异(p>0.05)。两个时期患者的主诉相似,最常见的主诉是恶心、腹痛和排便困难。尽管没有合并症的患者在这两个时期都占主导地位,但在大流行期间,患有合并症的比例更高(p=0.001)。在这两段时期都不需要紧急治疗的患者占大多数。在需要紧急治疗的患者中,在疫情期间住院患者的比率较高,而在非疫情期间手术患者的比率更高(p=0.005)。在这两个时期,大多数患者的社会经济水平较低,一小部分患者的社会经济水平中等(p>0.05)。此外,社会经济水平较低、75岁或75岁以上不需要紧急治疗的患者在疫情期间发病率较高(p=0.002)。结论:尽管在疫情期间,急诊入院人数和要求的普通外科会诊次数显著减少,超过一半接受咨询的患者不需要紧急手术治疗,这一事实仍然表明不必要地使用紧急服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Konuralp Tip Dergisi
Konuralp Tip Dergisi MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
期刊最新文献
Obstrüktif Uyku Apnede (OUA) Ortalama Trombosit Hacmi (OTH) ve OUA'da Sürekli Pozitif Hava Yolu Basıncı (CPAP) Tedavisinin OTH Üzerine Etkisi A Quasi-Experimental Controlled Educational Intervention for Mothers To Reduce Unnecessary Emergency Department Admissions in Children with Respiratory Tract Infection Symptoms Evaluation of Serum Annexin A1 Values in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Diseases Turkish Adaptation and Psychometric Properties of Nıjmegen Gender Awareness in Medicine Scale: Assessment of Validity and Relıability Prematür Ejakülasyon Tanılı Bireylerde Karar Verme ve Dürtüselliğin Değerlendirilmesi
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1