Investigation of COVID-19 Vaccine Acceptance and Early Side Effects of COVID-19 Vaccine in Hemodialysis Patients

IF 0.2 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Turkish Journal of Nephrology Pub Date : 2023-04-03 DOI:10.5152/turkjnephrol.2023.2234305
Kübra Aydın Bahat, Meral Meşe
{"title":"Investigation of COVID-19 Vaccine Acceptance and Early Side Effects of COVID-19 Vaccine in Hemodialysis Patients","authors":"Kübra Aydın Bahat, Meral Meşe","doi":"10.5152/turkjnephrol.2023.2234305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: We aimed to evaluate the acceptance of the COVID-19 vaccines and the frequency of side effects in hemodialysis patients. Methods: Patients receiving regular hemodialysis treatment were included in the study. Patients were asked for their opinions about whether they should have the COVID-19 vaccine. It was recorded which side effects were seen in patients who had received the COVID-19 vaccine. Results: Ninety-two patients who received hemodialysis treatment were evaluated, and 92.4% of them expressed a positive opinion about the COVID-19 vaccine. Patients who were not vaccinated for COVID-19 reported that they were not vaccinated because they thought the vaccine was ineffective. The mean age of patients who did not want to be vaccinated for COVID-19 was lower (P = .019). Among patients who experienced side effects after at least one of the vaccines, and patients who experienced side effects after the first dose of the COVID-19 vaccine, the frequency of side effects was significantly higher in those who received the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine (P = .001 and P = .001). When the first dose, second dose, and 2 doses of the COVID-19 vaccine were evaluated together, the relationship between increasing age and the decrease in the frequency of side effects was significant (P = .00, P = .001, and P = .015). Conclusion: The vaccination rate against COVID-19 was high in hemodialysis patients, and the most common reason for vaccine opposition was the thought that the vaccine was ineffective. In addition, the frequency of side effects was lower, it was observed that the side effects decreased with age, and the side effects were more frequent in mRNA. © 2023 Turkish Society of Nephrology. All rights reserved.","PeriodicalId":29873,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Nephrology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/turkjnephrol.2023.2234305","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: We aimed to evaluate the acceptance of the COVID-19 vaccines and the frequency of side effects in hemodialysis patients. Methods: Patients receiving regular hemodialysis treatment were included in the study. Patients were asked for their opinions about whether they should have the COVID-19 vaccine. It was recorded which side effects were seen in patients who had received the COVID-19 vaccine. Results: Ninety-two patients who received hemodialysis treatment were evaluated, and 92.4% of them expressed a positive opinion about the COVID-19 vaccine. Patients who were not vaccinated for COVID-19 reported that they were not vaccinated because they thought the vaccine was ineffective. The mean age of patients who did not want to be vaccinated for COVID-19 was lower (P = .019). Among patients who experienced side effects after at least one of the vaccines, and patients who experienced side effects after the first dose of the COVID-19 vaccine, the frequency of side effects was significantly higher in those who received the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine (P = .001 and P = .001). When the first dose, second dose, and 2 doses of the COVID-19 vaccine were evaluated together, the relationship between increasing age and the decrease in the frequency of side effects was significant (P = .00, P = .001, and P = .015). Conclusion: The vaccination rate against COVID-19 was high in hemodialysis patients, and the most common reason for vaccine opposition was the thought that the vaccine was ineffective. In addition, the frequency of side effects was lower, it was observed that the side effects decreased with age, and the side effects were more frequent in mRNA. © 2023 Turkish Society of Nephrology. All rights reserved.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
血液透析患者新冠肺炎疫苗接受情况及新冠肺炎疫苗早期副作用调查
目的:我们旨在评估新冠肺炎疫苗在血液透析患者中的接受度和副作用发生频率。方法:将接受常规血液透析治疗的患者纳入研究。患者被问及是否应该接种新冠肺炎疫苗的意见。记录了接种新冠肺炎疫苗的患者出现的副作用。结果:对90例接受血液透析治疗的患者进行了评估,其中92.4%的患者对新冠肺炎疫苗持肯定态度。未接种新冠肺炎疫苗的患者报告称,他们未接种疫苗是因为他们认为疫苗无效。不想接种新冠肺炎疫苗的患者的平均年龄较低(P=.019)。在至少接种一种疫苗后出现副作用的患者和第一剂新冠肺炎疫苗后出现不良反应的患者中,接种Pfizer-BioNTech疫苗的患者的副作用频率显著较高(P=.001和P=.001)。当同时评估第一剂、第二剂和两剂新冠肺炎疫苗时,结论:血液透析患者新冠肺炎疫苗接种率高,最常见的疫苗反对原因是认为疫苗无效。此外,副作用的频率较低,观察到副作用随着年龄的增长而减少,并且副作用在mRNA中更频繁。©2023土耳其肾脏病学会。保留所有权利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Turkish Journal of Nephrology
Turkish Journal of Nephrology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Utility of Bone Morphogenetic Protein 7 Levels on Predicting the Alteration of the Peritoneal Membrane Permeability Health-Related Quality of Life of Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease on Maintenance Hemodialysis and Its Determinants: A Study from a Tertiary Hospital in South India Antibody Response of Coronavirus Disease 2019 Infection and Affecting Factors in Maintenance Hemodialysis Patients* Post-COVID-19 Outcomes of Patients with Primary Glomerular Diseases: A Nationwide Controlled Study Coronavirus Disease 2019 Infection in a Gitelman Syndrome Patient: A Case Report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1