Improving Urban Air Quality Monitoring in Delhi, India: Reflections on Low-Cost Air Quality Sensors (LCAQS) and Participatory Engagement

IF 1.3 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Environment and Urbanization ASIA Pub Date : 2022-09-01 DOI:10.1177/09754253221122752
Arvaan Kumar, Sriroop Chaudhuri
{"title":"Improving Urban Air Quality Monitoring in Delhi, India: Reflections on Low-Cost Air Quality Sensors (LCAQS) and Participatory Engagement","authors":"Arvaan Kumar, Sriroop Chaudhuri","doi":"10.1177/09754253221122752","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Delhi, the capital city of India, air pollution has been a perpetual menace to urban sustainability and public health. The present study uses a mixed-method approach to enumerate to the urban authorities: (a) the state of air pollution in the city; (b) systemic flaws in the current monitoring network; (c) potential means to bolster it; and (d) need of a participatory framework for monitoring. Information about Air Quality Index (AQI), obtained from 36 monitoring stations across Delhi is compared between 2021 (20 April–25 May; 2nd year/phase of SARS-CoV-2 lockdown), and the corresponding time periods in 2020 (1st year/phase of lockdown), and 2019 (business-as-usual) using the Mann–Whitney U Test. AQI during the 2021 lockdown (a) appeared statistically more similar (p < .01) to that of 2019 and (b) exceeded the environmental health safety benchmark for 85% days during the study period (20 April–25 May). However, this only presented a partial glimpse into the air pollution status. It owes to numerous ‘holes’ in the AQI data record (no data and/or insufficient data). Moreover, certain areas in Delhi yet have no monitoring station, or only too few, to yield a ‘representative’ estimate (inadequate spatial coverage). Such shortcomings in the existing monitoring network may deter future research and targeted/informed decision-making for pollution control. To that end, the present research offers a summary view of Low-Cost Air Quality Sensors (LCAQS), to offer the urban sustainability authorities, ‘complementary’ technique to bolster and diversify the existing network. The main advantages and disadvantages of various LCAQS sensor technologies are highlighted while emphasizing on the challenges around various calibration techniques (linear and non-linear). The final section reflects on the integration of science and technology with social dimensions of air quality monitoring and highlights key requirements for (a) community mobilization and (b) stakeholder engagement to forge a participatory systems’ design for LCAQS deployment.","PeriodicalId":44690,"journal":{"name":"Environment and Urbanization ASIA","volume":"13 1","pages":"265 - 283"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environment and Urbanization ASIA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09754253221122752","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In Delhi, the capital city of India, air pollution has been a perpetual menace to urban sustainability and public health. The present study uses a mixed-method approach to enumerate to the urban authorities: (a) the state of air pollution in the city; (b) systemic flaws in the current monitoring network; (c) potential means to bolster it; and (d) need of a participatory framework for monitoring. Information about Air Quality Index (AQI), obtained from 36 monitoring stations across Delhi is compared between 2021 (20 April–25 May; 2nd year/phase of SARS-CoV-2 lockdown), and the corresponding time periods in 2020 (1st year/phase of lockdown), and 2019 (business-as-usual) using the Mann–Whitney U Test. AQI during the 2021 lockdown (a) appeared statistically more similar (p < .01) to that of 2019 and (b) exceeded the environmental health safety benchmark for 85% days during the study period (20 April–25 May). However, this only presented a partial glimpse into the air pollution status. It owes to numerous ‘holes’ in the AQI data record (no data and/or insufficient data). Moreover, certain areas in Delhi yet have no monitoring station, or only too few, to yield a ‘representative’ estimate (inadequate spatial coverage). Such shortcomings in the existing monitoring network may deter future research and targeted/informed decision-making for pollution control. To that end, the present research offers a summary view of Low-Cost Air Quality Sensors (LCAQS), to offer the urban sustainability authorities, ‘complementary’ technique to bolster and diversify the existing network. The main advantages and disadvantages of various LCAQS sensor technologies are highlighted while emphasizing on the challenges around various calibration techniques (linear and non-linear). The final section reflects on the integration of science and technology with social dimensions of air quality monitoring and highlights key requirements for (a) community mobilization and (b) stakeholder engagement to forge a participatory systems’ design for LCAQS deployment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
改善印度德里的城市空气质量监测:对低成本空气质量传感器(LCAQS)和参与式参与的思考
在印度首都德里,空气污染一直是城市可持续性和公众健康的永久威胁。本研究采用混合方法向城市当局列举:(a)城市空气污染状况;(b)现行监测网络存在系统缺陷;(c)潜在的支持手段;(d)需要一个参与性的监测框架。从德里36个监测站获得的空气质量指数(AQI)信息在2021年(4月20日至5月25日;使用曼-惠特尼U测试,分别计算2020年(封锁第一年/阶段)和2019年(一切照旧)的相应时间段。2021年封城期间的空气质量指数(a)与2019年的空气质量指数在统计上更为相似(p < 0.01), (b)在研究期间(4月20日至5月25日)有85%的天数超过了环境健康安全基准。然而,这只是对空气污染状况的部分了解。这是由于空气质量数据记录中存在许多“漏洞”(没有数据和/或数据不足)。此外,德里的某些地区还没有监测站,或者监测站太少,无法产生“代表性”的估计(空间覆盖不足)。现有监测网的这些缺点可能妨碍今后的污染控制研究和有针对性/知情的决策。为此,本研究提供了低成本空气质量传感器(LCAQS)的概述,为城市可持续发展当局提供“补充”技术,以支持现有网络并使其多样化。强调了各种LCAQS传感器技术的主要优点和缺点,同时强调了各种校准技术(线性和非线性)的挑战。最后一部分反映了科学和技术与空气质量监测的社会层面的整合,并强调了(a)社区动员和(b)利益相关者参与的关键要求,以形成LCAQS部署的参与式系统设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Environment and Urbanization ASIA
Environment and Urbanization ASIA ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
期刊最新文献
Is Your City Too Big? Causes of Urban Primacy in India Prerequisites and Factors for Effective and Efficient Implementation of Land Pooling/Reconstitution: Learnings from Asian Countries Land Redevelopment, Real Estate and Capital in Urban Place-making: A Case Study of Siliguri, India Drought: Profile Assessment, Impact Analysis and Coping Strategies to Combat Drought in Naogaon District of Bangladesh Local Economy as the Key Driver of Urbanization in the Indian Sundarbans
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1