Individual and Environmental Characteristics of Residential Workers Using Restraint and Seclusion in Youth Treatment Centers

IF 1 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Residential Treatment for Children & Youth Pub Date : 2022-05-17 DOI:10.1080/0886571X.2022.2076761
C. Mathieu, Steve Geoffrion
{"title":"Individual and Environmental Characteristics of Residential Workers Using Restraint and Seclusion in Youth Treatment Centers","authors":"C. Mathieu, Steve Geoffrion","doi":"10.1080/0886571X.2022.2076761","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The use of restraint and seclusion (R&S) in residential youth treatment centers has been a controversial topic over the past years. This study explored the differences between R&S super users and normal users for residential workers in terms of individual and environmental characteristics over eight weeks. One hundred ninety-eight residential workers completed the questionnaires, and Bayesian independent samples t-tests were conducted to verify the differences between the two groups. The results showed very strong evidence that super users have a greater fear of violence (B10 = 65.57), indeed strong evidence that they perceive more verbal aggression (B10 = 18.264), very strong evidence that they witness more aggression against themselves (B10 = 87.35), and extremely strong evidence that they perceive themselves to be more often victims of physical aggression (B10 = 398.55) than normal users. Moderate evidence also revealed that super users experienced a higher level of traumatic stress and perceived a better work climate than normal user (B10 = 3.751 and B10 = 5.116). Perceived stress, chronic fatigue, acute fatigue, recovery, self-efficacy, compassion fatigue, burnout, and social climate order, and organization (work team’s orientation and sense of cohesion) were not statistically associated with R&S (B10 = 0.166 to 0.415).","PeriodicalId":45491,"journal":{"name":"Residential Treatment for Children & Youth","volume":"40 1","pages":"238 - 260"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Residential Treatment for Children & Youth","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0886571X.2022.2076761","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT The use of restraint and seclusion (R&S) in residential youth treatment centers has been a controversial topic over the past years. This study explored the differences between R&S super users and normal users for residential workers in terms of individual and environmental characteristics over eight weeks. One hundred ninety-eight residential workers completed the questionnaires, and Bayesian independent samples t-tests were conducted to verify the differences between the two groups. The results showed very strong evidence that super users have a greater fear of violence (B10 = 65.57), indeed strong evidence that they perceive more verbal aggression (B10 = 18.264), very strong evidence that they witness more aggression against themselves (B10 = 87.35), and extremely strong evidence that they perceive themselves to be more often victims of physical aggression (B10 = 398.55) than normal users. Moderate evidence also revealed that super users experienced a higher level of traumatic stress and perceived a better work climate than normal user (B10 = 3.751 and B10 = 5.116). Perceived stress, chronic fatigue, acute fatigue, recovery, self-efficacy, compassion fatigue, burnout, and social climate order, and organization (work team’s orientation and sense of cohesion) were not statistically associated with R&S (B10 = 0.166 to 0.415).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在青少年治疗中心使用约束和隔离的住宿工作者的个体和环境特征
摘要在过去的几年里,寄宿青少年治疗中心使用约束和隔离(R&S)一直是一个有争议的话题。本研究探讨了住宅工人R&S超级用户和普通用户在八周内的个人和环境特征方面的差异。198名居住工作者完成了问卷调查,并进行了贝叶斯独立样本t检验来验证两组之间的差异。结果显示,有非常有力的证据表明超级用户对暴力有更大的恐惧(B10=65.57),确实有强有力的证据表明他们感知到更多的言语攻击(B10=18.264),有非常强有力的证据证明他们目睹了更多的对自己的攻击(B10=87.35),以及极其有力的证据表明,他们认为自己比正常用户更经常成为身体攻击的受害者(B10=398.55)。中度证据还显示,超级用户比正常用户经历了更高水平的创伤压力,并感知到更好的工作氛围(B10=3.751和B10=5.116)。感知压力、慢性疲劳、急性疲劳、恢复、自我效能、同情疲劳、倦怠和社会氛围秩序,和组织(工作团队的取向和凝聚力)与R&s没有统计学相关性(B10=0.16~0.415)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
33.30%
发文量
27
期刊最新文献
Trauma–Sensitive Residential Care: Perspectives of Portuguese Professionals to Spark Change Guest Editors’ Note Mapping the Journey to Success: Key Characteristics of Male Youths Benefiting the Most from Therapeutic Residential Care After One Year of Intervention Knowledge of Autism and Attitudes Toward Autistic Children: Evaluation of Child Protection Service Staff in Türkiye From Distancing to Connecting: Residential Care Engagement with External Stakeholders Amidst COVID-19. An Italian Investigation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1