{"title":"The Title Hierarchy of the Last Komnenoi and the Angelos Dynasty – from Sebastohypertatos to Sebastokrator ","authors":"P. Lachowicz","doi":"10.18778/2084-140x.11.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The system of dignities introduced by Alexios I Komnenos was an answer for the need of a new reformed title hierarchy, adequate for aristocratic model of exercising power. It served as a clear manifestation of the special privileged position of emperor’s kinsmen. The titles granted to those relatives and affines can be traced accurately up to the reign of Manuel I. So far, however, little space has been devoted to the analysis of that system during the Angelos dynasty.It is often generally assumed following Niketas Choniates testimony, that the title hierarchy in the late 12th century suffered certain loss of value or inflation. It is worth taking a closer look at this process, on the example of the titles traditionally granted to the closest family members, at the courts of Andronicus I Komnenos and the Angeloi. I would like to focus particularly on those dignities, that at the time of the Komnenoi were given to the emperor’s siblings and his sons-in-law – from sebastohypertatos to sebastokrator. That part of the title hierarchy was much closer to a ruler, making it easier to trace.The basic problem encountered by researchers of this period is the small number of sources, not allowing for full reconstruction of the title hierarchy. However, very limited information found in the written sources can be complemented by aristocratic lead seals, which often included the dignity of their owners.From such an analysis emerges a picture of a steady evolution of the Komnenian system. The emperors of the late 12th century adjusted court dignities to need at hand. Yet that process doesn’t seem to diminish significantly the value of the highest titles.","PeriodicalId":40873,"journal":{"name":"Studia Ceranea","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Ceranea","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18778/2084-140x.11.14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The system of dignities introduced by Alexios I Komnenos was an answer for the need of a new reformed title hierarchy, adequate for aristocratic model of exercising power. It served as a clear manifestation of the special privileged position of emperor’s kinsmen. The titles granted to those relatives and affines can be traced accurately up to the reign of Manuel I. So far, however, little space has been devoted to the analysis of that system during the Angelos dynasty.It is often generally assumed following Niketas Choniates testimony, that the title hierarchy in the late 12th century suffered certain loss of value or inflation. It is worth taking a closer look at this process, on the example of the titles traditionally granted to the closest family members, at the courts of Andronicus I Komnenos and the Angeloi. I would like to focus particularly on those dignities, that at the time of the Komnenoi were given to the emperor’s siblings and his sons-in-law – from sebastohypertatos to sebastokrator. That part of the title hierarchy was much closer to a ruler, making it easier to trace.The basic problem encountered by researchers of this period is the small number of sources, not allowing for full reconstruction of the title hierarchy. However, very limited information found in the written sources can be complemented by aristocratic lead seals, which often included the dignity of their owners.From such an analysis emerges a picture of a steady evolution of the Komnenian system. The emperors of the late 12th century adjusted court dignities to need at hand. Yet that process doesn’t seem to diminish significantly the value of the highest titles.
Alexios I Komnenos引入的尊卑制度是对新的改革后的头衔等级制度需求的回应,足以满足贵族行使权力的模式。它清楚地表明了皇亲国戚的特殊特权地位。授予这些亲属和亲属的头衔可以准确地追溯到曼努埃尔一世统治时期。然而,到目前为止,很少有篇幅来分析安吉洛斯王朝时期的这一制度。根据Niketas Choniates的证词,人们通常认为12世纪末的头衔等级制度遭受了一定的价值损失或通货膨胀。值得仔细研究一下这一过程,以传统上授予最亲密家庭成员的头衔为例,在安德洛尼库斯·科姆内诺斯和安杰洛伊的法院。我想特别关注那些荣誉,在Komnenoi时代,这些荣誉是给皇帝的兄弟姐妹和他的女婿的——从sebastohypertatos到sebastokrator。标题层次结构的这一部分更接近统治者,更容易追踪。这一时期的研究人员遇到的基本问题是来源数量少,无法完全重建标题层次。然而,在书面资料中发现的非常有限的信息可以用贵族铅印来补充,铅印通常包括其所有者的尊严。从这样的分析中,我们看到了科姆宁体系的稳定演变。12世纪末的皇帝们根据手头的需要调整了宫廷的地位。然而,这一过程似乎并没有显著降低最高头衔的价值。