Race Unequals: Overseer Contracts, White Masculinities, and the Formation of Managerial Identity in the Plantation Economy

IF 1.1 1区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY Journal of American History Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.1093/jahist/jaad024
Jesse J. Gant
{"title":"Race Unequals: Overseer Contracts, White Masculinities, and the Formation of Managerial Identity in the Plantation Economy","authors":"Jesse J. Gant","doi":"10.1093/jahist/jaad024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In academic studies of the southern plantation, the overseer is often portrayed in simple terms as a lower-class white male who did not himself own land or enslaved persons. Departing from these one-dimensional descriptions, McMurtry-Chubb illustrates the plantation overseer in a much more granular way. In this lucid and engaging monograph, she shows how public and private law helped construct the overseer’s masculine identity in a way that both elevated the social status of elite planter males, and lowered the status of the enslaved people the overseer managed. The overseer’s performance of masculinity was assigned a value (lower than the planter, higher than the enslaved) “based on the imperatives of capitalist and white supremacist structures” (xiii)—another iteration of Du Bois’s critical concept of the “wage of whiteness” and its tendency to undermine class consciousness. To develop her powerful theory of the overseer’s masculinity, McMurtry-Chubb draws upon employment contracts entered into between overseers and plantation owners, which she located in the papers of several plantations in southern slave-holding states. She also relies upon public laws–– statutes governing the conduct of the enslaved and their owners––and court cases in which overseers litigated employment claims against plantation owners. Her exhaustive research produces a robust dataset from which she crafts riveting descriptions and examples. In the first chapter, McMurtry-Chubb exposes the class striations within the plantation economy, in which only elite southern planters, the proverbial “one percent” who owned five or more enslaved persons, enjoyed upper-class status. Everyone else was consigned to a lower social station. In terms of the legal context, McMurtry-Chubb explains common-law contract concepts as they existed in antebellum times and shows how contracts moved from a simplistic focus on the transfer of title to a performance-based obligation, under which free people transferred an ownership","PeriodicalId":47500,"journal":{"name":"Journal of American History","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of American History","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jahist/jaad024","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In academic studies of the southern plantation, the overseer is often portrayed in simple terms as a lower-class white male who did not himself own land or enslaved persons. Departing from these one-dimensional descriptions, McMurtry-Chubb illustrates the plantation overseer in a much more granular way. In this lucid and engaging monograph, she shows how public and private law helped construct the overseer’s masculine identity in a way that both elevated the social status of elite planter males, and lowered the status of the enslaved people the overseer managed. The overseer’s performance of masculinity was assigned a value (lower than the planter, higher than the enslaved) “based on the imperatives of capitalist and white supremacist structures” (xiii)—another iteration of Du Bois’s critical concept of the “wage of whiteness” and its tendency to undermine class consciousness. To develop her powerful theory of the overseer’s masculinity, McMurtry-Chubb draws upon employment contracts entered into between overseers and plantation owners, which she located in the papers of several plantations in southern slave-holding states. She also relies upon public laws–– statutes governing the conduct of the enslaved and their owners––and court cases in which overseers litigated employment claims against plantation owners. Her exhaustive research produces a robust dataset from which she crafts riveting descriptions and examples. In the first chapter, McMurtry-Chubb exposes the class striations within the plantation economy, in which only elite southern planters, the proverbial “one percent” who owned five or more enslaved persons, enjoyed upper-class status. Everyone else was consigned to a lower social station. In terms of the legal context, McMurtry-Chubb explains common-law contract concepts as they existed in antebellum times and shows how contracts moved from a simplistic focus on the transfer of title to a performance-based obligation, under which free people transferred an ownership
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
种族不平等:监工合同、白人男子主义与种植园经济中管理身份的形成
在对南方种植园的学术研究中,监工通常被简单地描绘成一个自己没有土地或奴隶的下层白人男性。与这些一维的描述不同,麦克默特里-丘伯以一种更细致的方式描绘了种植园监督员。在这本清晰而引人入胜的专著中,她展示了公法和私法是如何帮助建立监督者的男性身份的,这种方式既提高了精英种植园男性的社会地位,又降低了监督者所管理的奴隶的地位。监工的男子气概表现被赋予了一个价值(低于种植园主,高于奴隶)“基于资本主义和白人至上主义结构的命令”(xiii)——这是杜波依斯关于“白人工资”及其破坏阶级意识倾向的批判概念的又一次重复。为了发展她关于监工的男子气概的有力理论,麦克默特里-丘伯借鉴了监工和种植园主之间签订的雇佣合同,她在南方蓄奴州的几个种植园的文件中找到了这些合同。她还依赖于公法——规范奴隶和奴隶主行为的法规——以及监工起诉种植园主就业索赔的法庭案件。她详尽的研究产生了一个强大的数据集,从中她制作了引人入胜的描述和例子。在第一章中,麦克默特里-丘伯揭露了种植园经济中的阶级分化,在这种情况下,只有拥有五个或更多奴隶的南方精英种植园主,即众所周知的“百分之一”,才享有上层阶级地位。其他人的社会地位都降低了。在法律背景方面,mcmurry - chubb解释了普通法合同的概念,因为它们存在于内战前的时代,并展示了合同如何从简单的关注所有权的转移转变为基于履行的义务,在这种义务下,自由人转移了所有权
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
226
期刊介绍: The Journal of American History is the leading scholarly publication and the journal of record in the field of American history. Published quarterly in March, June, September, and December, the Journal continues its nine-decade-long career presenting original articles on American history. Many are widely reprinted or have won prizes. Each volume of the Journal features a variety of pieces that deal with every aspect of American history, including state-of-the-field essays, broadly inclusive book reviews, and reviews of films, museum exhibitions, and Web sites. Our large board of International contributing editors helps the Journal meet its goal of situating American history within a global context.
期刊最新文献
The Deviant Prison: Philadelphia's Eastern State Penitentiary and the Origins of America's Modern Penal System, 1829–1913 American Health Crisis: 100 Years of Panic, Planning, and Politics Washington at the Plow: The Founding Farmer and the Question of Slavery The Transcendentalists and Their World Healing Journeys: Veterans, Trauma, and the Return to Vietnam
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1