IVC Filter Retrieval before and after Implementation of IVC Filter Retrieval Alert System (IFRAS): A Single-Center Experience

Hassan Aljaziri, Refaat Salman, N. Shaheen, Mohammad Alaftan
{"title":"IVC Filter Retrieval before and after Implementation of IVC Filter Retrieval Alert System (IFRAS): A Single-Center Experience","authors":"Hassan Aljaziri, Refaat Salman, N. Shaheen, Mohammad Alaftan","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1763499","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objective  The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the IVC filter retrieval alert system (IFRAS) in increasing the inferior vena cava (IVC) filter retrieval rate. Materials and Methods  This study was a case-based retrospective study, for patients who had IVC filter insertion from January 2013 to December 2019 with a sample of 756 patients. The sample was divided into two groups for filter retrieval rate: before the implementation of the tracking system (IFRAS) between 2013 and 2015 with a sample of 321 patients, and after the implementation of the tracking system (IFRAS) between 2016 and 2019 with a sample of 435 patients. This study aimed to compare the IVC filter retrieval rate before and after the implementation of the IFRAS. The tracking system (IFRAS) protocol was applied by a dedicated employee who is actively tracking patients and strictly following them up with a referred physician or interventional radiologist through the interventional radiology clinic. Results  The IVC filter retrieval before the implementation of the tracking system (2013–2015) was 38.3% (123/321), and it became 54.25% (236/435) after the implementation of the tracking system with a p -value less than 0.001. Before implementing the tracking system, patients with no follow-up after IVC filter insertion were 45.17% (145/321), and this decreased to 41.15% (179/435) after implementing the tracking system. Conclusion  The study proved a statistically significant difference in increasing the IVC filter retrieval rate after implementing the IFRAS.","PeriodicalId":32940,"journal":{"name":"The Arab Journal of Interventional Radiology","volume":"07 1","pages":"031 - 034"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Arab Journal of Interventional Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1763499","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Objective  The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the IVC filter retrieval alert system (IFRAS) in increasing the inferior vena cava (IVC) filter retrieval rate. Materials and Methods  This study was a case-based retrospective study, for patients who had IVC filter insertion from January 2013 to December 2019 with a sample of 756 patients. The sample was divided into two groups for filter retrieval rate: before the implementation of the tracking system (IFRAS) between 2013 and 2015 with a sample of 321 patients, and after the implementation of the tracking system (IFRAS) between 2016 and 2019 with a sample of 435 patients. This study aimed to compare the IVC filter retrieval rate before and after the implementation of the IFRAS. The tracking system (IFRAS) protocol was applied by a dedicated employee who is actively tracking patients and strictly following them up with a referred physician or interventional radiologist through the interventional radiology clinic. Results  The IVC filter retrieval before the implementation of the tracking system (2013–2015) was 38.3% (123/321), and it became 54.25% (236/435) after the implementation of the tracking system with a p -value less than 0.001. Before implementing the tracking system, patients with no follow-up after IVC filter insertion were 45.17% (145/321), and this decreased to 41.15% (179/435) after implementing the tracking system. Conclusion  The study proved a statistically significant difference in increasing the IVC filter retrieval rate after implementing the IFRAS.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
IVC过滤器检索警报系统(IFRAS)实施前后的IVC过滤器查询:单中心经验
抽象目标 本研究的目的是评估下腔静脉滤器回收警报系统(IFRAS)在提高下腔静脉(IVC)滤器回收率方面的有效性。材料和方法 本研究是一项基于病例的回顾性研究,针对2013年1月至2019年12月植入IVC过滤器的患者,样本为756名患者。样本的过滤器检索率分为两组:2013年至2015年实施跟踪系统(IFRAS)之前,样本为321名患者,2016年至2019年实施跟踪制度(IFRAS,样本为435名患者)之后。本研究旨在比较IFRAS实施前后的IVC过滤器检索率。跟踪系统(IFRAS)协议由一名专职员工应用,该员工积极跟踪患者,并通过介入放射科诊所与转诊医生或介入放射科医生严格跟进。后果 跟踪系统实施前(2013-2015)IVC过滤器检索率为38.3%(123/321),跟踪系统实施后为54.25%(236/435),p值小于0.001。在实施跟踪系统之前,IVC过滤器插入后没有随访的患者为45.17%(145/321),实施跟踪系统后这一比例降至41.15%(179/435)。结论 该研究证明,在实施IFRAS后,在提高IVC过滤器检索率方面存在统计学上的显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Keynote PAIRS2024: The Diamond Jubilee of Interventional Radiology, Reflection on the Era of Modernizing Medicine: Our Wins, Losses, and Future Opportunities… Complication Rate of Percutaneous Balloon-Retention versus Locking-Loop Gastrostomy and Gastrojejunostomy Tube Insertion: A Comparison from a Canadian Tertiary Care Centre Ischemic Stroke Post-Transradial Chemoembolization Minimizing the Pain of Local Anesthesia Administration in Interventional Radiology with an Anesthetic Portal Technique Prophylactic Antibiotic Use Prior to Port Placement and Its Effect on Insertion-Related Infection Rates: A Five-Year Retrospective Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1