CLINICAL OUTCOMES AND ADVERSE DRUG REACTIONS IN COVID-19 PATIENTS TREATED WITH HYDROXYCHLOROQUINE AND AZITHROMYCIN ALONE OR COMBINED

H. Rathi, P. Rathi, M. Biyani
{"title":"CLINICAL OUTCOMES AND ADVERSE DRUG REACTIONS IN COVID-19 PATIENTS TREATED WITH HYDROXYCHLOROQUINE AND AZITHROMYCIN ALONE OR COMBINED","authors":"H. Rathi, P. Rathi, M. Biyani","doi":"10.11603/ijmmr.2413-6077.2021.1.11814","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. Use of Hydroxychloroquine with or without Azithromycin is repurposed in SARS-CoV-2 in the absence of definitive treatment. \nObjective. To evaluate the association between the use of Hydroxychloroquine and Azithromycin when given alone or in combination on clinical outcomes and adverse drug reactions among lab confirmed SARS CoV-2 positive patients admitted in a COVID tertiary care hospital of a University Medical college.\nMethods. a retrospective observational comparative study was conducted. COVID-19 positive patients admitted in study hospital for management of COVID-19 were enrolled into the study. The patients were categorized into 4 treatment groups based on having received the following treatment during hospitalization: (A) Hydroxychloroquine with Azithromycin, (B) Hydroxychloroquine without Azithromycin (Hydroxychloroquine alone), (C) Azithromycin alone, and (D) Neither drug, defined as no receipt of either Hydroxychloroquine or Azithromycin in the record; other medications may have been dispensed.\nResults. 800 patients were enrolled. Mean±Standard deviation of duration of hospital stay (in days) for study Group A was 11.37±7.11, for Group B was 8.37±4.77, for Group C was 18.22 ± 5.69 and for Group D was 6.12±2.97. Mortality in Group A was 29.74%, Group B – 33.16%, Group C – 0% and in Group D – 1.32%.\nConclusion. Among hospitalized patients with COVID-19 treatment, Group C was associated with good clinical outcome. However, the interpretation of these findings may be limited by the observational design.","PeriodicalId":14059,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medicine and Medical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medicine and Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11603/ijmmr.2413-6077.2021.1.11814","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background. Use of Hydroxychloroquine with or without Azithromycin is repurposed in SARS-CoV-2 in the absence of definitive treatment. Objective. To evaluate the association between the use of Hydroxychloroquine and Azithromycin when given alone or in combination on clinical outcomes and adverse drug reactions among lab confirmed SARS CoV-2 positive patients admitted in a COVID tertiary care hospital of a University Medical college. Methods. a retrospective observational comparative study was conducted. COVID-19 positive patients admitted in study hospital for management of COVID-19 were enrolled into the study. The patients were categorized into 4 treatment groups based on having received the following treatment during hospitalization: (A) Hydroxychloroquine with Azithromycin, (B) Hydroxychloroquine without Azithromycin (Hydroxychloroquine alone), (C) Azithromycin alone, and (D) Neither drug, defined as no receipt of either Hydroxychloroquine or Azithromycin in the record; other medications may have been dispensed. Results. 800 patients were enrolled. Mean±Standard deviation of duration of hospital stay (in days) for study Group A was 11.37±7.11, for Group B was 8.37±4.77, for Group C was 18.22 ± 5.69 and for Group D was 6.12±2.97. Mortality in Group A was 29.74%, Group B – 33.16%, Group C – 0% and in Group D – 1.32%. Conclusion. Among hospitalized patients with COVID-19 treatment, Group C was associated with good clinical outcome. However, the interpretation of these findings may be limited by the observational design.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新冠肺炎患者单独或联合应用羟氯喹和阿奇霉素的临床结果和不良反应
背景。在没有明确治疗的情况下,在SARS-CoV-2中重新使用羟氯喹合并或不合并阿奇霉素。目标。评价某大学医学院三级医院收治的实验室确诊SARS CoV-2阳性患者单独或联合使用羟氯喹和阿奇霉素与临床结局和药物不良反应的关系。进行回顾性观察性比较研究。将研究医院收治的COVID-19阳性患者纳入研究。根据住院期间是否接受过以下治疗将患者分为4个治疗组:(A)羟氯喹联合阿奇霉素,(B)羟氯喹不联合阿奇霉素(单独使用羟氯喹),(C)单独使用阿奇霉素,(D)两种药物均未使用,即未使用羟氯喹或阿奇霉素;其他药物可能已经配发。结果。800名患者入组。A组患者住院时间(天)的平均值±标准差为11.37±7.11,B组为8.37±4.77,C组为18.22±5.69,D组为6.12±2.97。A组死亡率为29.74%,B组为33.16%,C组为0%,D组为1.32%。在接受COVID-19治疗的住院患者中,C组临床预后良好。然而,对这些发现的解释可能受到观察设计的限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊最新文献
ANTHROPOMETRIC VARIABLES IN BREAST LESIONS OF WOMEN OF REPRODUCTIVE AGE IN UNIVERSITY OF PORT HARCOURT TEACHING HOSPITAL COMPARATIVE CHARACTERISTICS OF SYMPTOMS IN NEUROTIC AND AFFECTIVE PATIENTS AFTER COVID-19 FLUORIDES AND ORAL HEALTH IMPACT OF COVID-19 PANDEMIC ON THE RADIOTHERAPY AND CANCER PATIENTS IN A TERTIARY HEALTH CARE CENTER OF ASSAM, NORTHEAST INDIA: A RETROSPECTIVE SINGLE INSTITUTION STUDY SICKLE CELL THALASSEMIA IN AN ADULT FROM CENTRAL INDIA SHOWING MASSIVE SPLENIC INFARCTION AND GAMNA-GANDY BODIES IN SPLENIC PARENCHYMA WITH CONCOMITANT PLASMODIUM FALCIPARUM INFECTION
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1