School-based Sexuality Education Curricula: Are Parents Supportive?

Q2 Social Sciences Naselenie i ekonomika Pub Date : 2023-06-27 DOI:10.3897/popecon.7.e102566
Viktoriya I. Yuodeshko
{"title":"School-based Sexuality Education Curricula: Are Parents Supportive?","authors":"Viktoriya I. Yuodeshko","doi":"10.3897/popecon.7.e102566","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper discusses the findings of a study on the attitudes of Belarusian parents with school-aged children towards school-based sexuality education programs. The study aimed to measure parental support for comprehensive sexuality education (CSE) and its individual components, identify the topics and age ranges approved by parents, and determine which course characteristics are important to them. Descriptive statistics and binary logistic regression were used to evaluate the factors that influence parental support for introducing sexuality education in schools.\n The study found that a fairly high share of 60.6% of parents were supportive of the introduction of CSE, despite low satisfaction and awareness of the current information presented in schools. Parents approved a median age of 13.3 years as the minimum age for CSE curriculum. However, topics such as safe use of cell phones, computers, the Internet, and social media; psychological pressure and violence; peer bullying; confronting peers; sources of help; relationships, love, friendship, parenting, and family were considered permissible for earlier age ranges.\n The study found that parental support to school-based sexuality education is influenced by several factors. These include parents’ normative ideas about the balance of responsibility between family and school in educating children and adolescents about sexuality, the level of awareness of and satisfaction with available information on sexual development and health in the school curriculum, whether parents have a college degree, parents’ personal experiences in having intimate conversations with their children, and any difficulties they may encounter in such communication. The paper offers recommendations for a CSE course architecture that is relevant to the context of Belarus and meets parental expectations, as well as on perspectives for advancing sexuality education in Belarus.","PeriodicalId":33779,"journal":{"name":"Naselenie i ekonomika","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Naselenie i ekonomika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3897/popecon.7.e102566","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper discusses the findings of a study on the attitudes of Belarusian parents with school-aged children towards school-based sexuality education programs. The study aimed to measure parental support for comprehensive sexuality education (CSE) and its individual components, identify the topics and age ranges approved by parents, and determine which course characteristics are important to them. Descriptive statistics and binary logistic regression were used to evaluate the factors that influence parental support for introducing sexuality education in schools. The study found that a fairly high share of 60.6% of parents were supportive of the introduction of CSE, despite low satisfaction and awareness of the current information presented in schools. Parents approved a median age of 13.3 years as the minimum age for CSE curriculum. However, topics such as safe use of cell phones, computers, the Internet, and social media; psychological pressure and violence; peer bullying; confronting peers; sources of help; relationships, love, friendship, parenting, and family were considered permissible for earlier age ranges. The study found that parental support to school-based sexuality education is influenced by several factors. These include parents’ normative ideas about the balance of responsibility between family and school in educating children and adolescents about sexuality, the level of awareness of and satisfaction with available information on sexual development and health in the school curriculum, whether parents have a college degree, parents’ personal experiences in having intimate conversations with their children, and any difficulties they may encounter in such communication. The paper offers recommendations for a CSE course architecture that is relevant to the context of Belarus and meets parental expectations, as well as on perspectives for advancing sexuality education in Belarus.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
校本性教育课程:家长是否支持?
本文讨论了一项关于白俄罗斯学龄儿童家长对学校性教育项目态度的研究结果。这项研究旨在衡量父母对全面性教育(CSE)及其个人组成部分的支持,确定父母批准的主题和年龄范围,并确定哪些课程特征对他们来说很重要。采用描述性统计和二元逻辑回归方法,评价了影响家长支持学校引入性教育的因素。研究发现,尽管对学校提供的当前信息的满意度和认识较低,但仍有相当高比例的60.6%的家长支持引入CSE。家长们批准将13.3岁的中位年龄作为CSE课程的最低年龄。然而,诸如安全使用手机、电脑、互联网和社交媒体等话题;心理压力和暴力;同伴欺凌;对抗同行;帮助来源;人际关系、爱情、友谊、养育子女和家庭被认为是早期年龄段允许的。研究发现,父母对学校性教育的支持受到几个因素的影响。其中包括父母关于在教育儿童和青少年性行为方面家庭和学校责任平衡的规范性想法,对学校课程中关于性发展和健康的现有信息的认识和满意度,父母是否拥有大学学位,父母与孩子进行亲密对话的个人经历,以及他们在这种沟通中可能遇到的任何困难。该文件为CSE课程架构提出了建议,该架构与白俄罗斯的背景相关,符合家长的期望,并对推进白俄罗斯性教育的前景提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Naselenie i ekonomika
Naselenie i ekonomika Social Sciences-Gender Studies
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Geoinformation analysis russian health system: modeling, visualization, analysis Sustainable development, ESG and the “price” of health Household time allocation in Russia: economic or sociocultural model? Cultural Changes in Russia during the Coronavirus Crisis Involved fatherhood in Russia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1