Uncertainty analysis of risk-based flood safety standards in the Netherlands through a scenario-based approach

S. Westerhof, M. Booij, Marcel C. J. Van den Berg, Ric Huting, J. Warmink
{"title":"Uncertainty analysis of risk-based flood safety standards in the Netherlands through a scenario-based approach","authors":"S. Westerhof, M. Booij, Marcel C. J. Van den Berg, Ric Huting, J. Warmink","doi":"10.1080/15715124.2022.2060243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Flood risk quantification is a complex process involving a chain of models. The approach contains many uncertainties which accumulate in the calculated flood risk. Risk-based flood safety standards are therefore prone to large uncertainty. This study aims to quantify the uncertainty of risk-based flood safety standards for a Dutch riverine case study. Through a systematic approach using expert elicitation, the key uncertainty sources in the Dutch safety standard derivation are identified. Uncertainty magnitudes are quantified for five main sources of uncertainty, after which these uncertainties are propagated through the model chain in a scenario analysis to derive flood safety standards. The results show that the Dutch risk-based flood safety standards are highly uncertain given the relative uncertainty bandwidth of 70%. The flood safety standards are found to be most sensitive to damage function and evacuation uncertainty. Also, we show that the impact of uncertainty strongly depends on local characteristics.","PeriodicalId":14344,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of River Basin Management","volume":"21 1","pages":"559 - 574"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of River Basin Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15715124.2022.2060243","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"WATER RESOURCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

ABSTRACT Flood risk quantification is a complex process involving a chain of models. The approach contains many uncertainties which accumulate in the calculated flood risk. Risk-based flood safety standards are therefore prone to large uncertainty. This study aims to quantify the uncertainty of risk-based flood safety standards for a Dutch riverine case study. Through a systematic approach using expert elicitation, the key uncertainty sources in the Dutch safety standard derivation are identified. Uncertainty magnitudes are quantified for five main sources of uncertainty, after which these uncertainties are propagated through the model chain in a scenario analysis to derive flood safety standards. The results show that the Dutch risk-based flood safety standards are highly uncertain given the relative uncertainty bandwidth of 70%. The flood safety standards are found to be most sensitive to damage function and evacuation uncertainty. Also, we show that the impact of uncertainty strongly depends on local characteristics.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于情景的荷兰基于风险的洪水安全标准的不确定性分析
洪水风险量化是一个涉及一系列模型的复杂过程。该方法包含许多不确定性,这些不确定性累积在计算的洪水风险中。因此,基于风险的洪水安全标准容易产生很大的不确定性。本研究旨在量化荷兰河流案例研究中基于风险的洪水安全标准的不确定性。通过使用专家启发的系统方法,确定了荷兰安全标准推导中的关键不确定性来源。对五个主要不确定性来源的不确定性大小进行量化,然后在情景分析中通过模型链传播这些不确定性,以得出洪水安全标准。结果表明,考虑到70%的相对不确定性带宽,荷兰基于风险的洪水安全标准具有高度的不确定性。洪水安全标准对破坏函数和疏散不确定性最为敏感。此外,我们还表明,不确定性的影响在很大程度上取决于局部特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
4.00%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: include, but are not limited to new developments or applications in the following areas: AREAS OF INTEREST - integrated water resources management - watershed land use planning and management - spatial planning and management of floodplains - flood forecasting and flood risk management - drought forecasting and drought management - floodplain, river and estuarine restoration - climate change impact prediction and planning of remedial measures - management of mountain rivers - water quality management including non point source pollution - operation strategies for engineered river systems - maintenance strategies for river systems and for structures - project-affected-people and stakeholder participation - conservation of natural and cultural heritage
期刊最新文献
The Rise of Counter Hydro-Hegemony and the Deconstruction of Old Narratives in the Eastern Nile Basin A Comparison of Eulerian and Semi-Lagrangian Approaches for Modeling Stream Water Quality People beyond the Border in the Sandbars of Damodar River: Understanding the People’s Management in a Changing Landscape, India Occurrence, toxicity load, pollution index and health risk assessment of trace elements in drinking water of two catchments in North-western Himalayas. Floods in Dinaric Karst fields: a case study of the Dicmanjsko-Bisko Polje (Croatia)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1