LGBTQ Health and Well-Being in China: A Trend Analysis of English- and Chinese-Language Research, 2011–2018

Tao Lin, Yi-Kun Cheng, T. Hughes, C. Veldhuis
{"title":"LGBTQ Health and Well-Being in China: A Trend Analysis of English- and Chinese-Language Research, 2011–2018","authors":"Tao Lin, Yi-Kun Cheng, T. Hughes, C. Veldhuis","doi":"10.31234/OSF.IO/CMXQU","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Research on LGBTQ populations has dramatically increased in both Western and non-Western countries over the past several decades. Attempts to synthesize this research have largely focused on studies conducted in the West. We conducted a review of LGBTQ research in China to elucidate trends and gaps in the literature and to provide a foundation for future research. Methods: We searched the literature to identify studies that focused on LGBTQ people in China using PsycINFO and reviews of article titles and abstracts in 15 English-language LGBTQ-specific journals published between 2011–2018. We used the Wanfang database to identify Chinese-language LGBTQ research articles published in any journal between 2011–2018. Each article was coded by topic, study type, province, and sample. Results: These searches yielded 798 LGBTQ research studies conducted in China between 2011–2018. HIV/AIDS, sexuality, and LGBTQ-specific issues (e.g., coming out) have been most frequently studied. Most of the articles focused on sexual minority men (69.5%), with smaller proportions focused on sexual minority women (15.5%) or transgender individuals (2.6%). The disparity wasreduced after excluding studies on HIV or other sexually transmitted infections. The geographic distribution of studies was uneven; most were conducted in economically developed areas. Conclusion: This study identified gaps and trends in LGBTQ research in China and highlighted priority and under-researched topics to guide future LGBTQ research. More research on these understudied populations and topics will contribute to understanding of LGBTQ populations.","PeriodicalId":72223,"journal":{"name":"Annals of LGBTQ public and population health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of LGBTQ public and population health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31234/OSF.IO/CMXQU","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose: Research on LGBTQ populations has dramatically increased in both Western and non-Western countries over the past several decades. Attempts to synthesize this research have largely focused on studies conducted in the West. We conducted a review of LGBTQ research in China to elucidate trends and gaps in the literature and to provide a foundation for future research. Methods: We searched the literature to identify studies that focused on LGBTQ people in China using PsycINFO and reviews of article titles and abstracts in 15 English-language LGBTQ-specific journals published between 2011–2018. We used the Wanfang database to identify Chinese-language LGBTQ research articles published in any journal between 2011–2018. Each article was coded by topic, study type, province, and sample. Results: These searches yielded 798 LGBTQ research studies conducted in China between 2011–2018. HIV/AIDS, sexuality, and LGBTQ-specific issues (e.g., coming out) have been most frequently studied. Most of the articles focused on sexual minority men (69.5%), with smaller proportions focused on sexual minority women (15.5%) or transgender individuals (2.6%). The disparity wasreduced after excluding studies on HIV or other sexually transmitted infections. The geographic distribution of studies was uneven; most were conducted in economically developed areas. Conclusion: This study identified gaps and trends in LGBTQ research in China and highlighted priority and under-researched topics to guide future LGBTQ research. More research on these understudied populations and topics will contribute to understanding of LGBTQ populations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2011-2018年中国LGBTQ健康与福祉:中英文研究趋势分析
目的:在过去几十年里,西方和非西方国家对LGBTQ人群的研究急剧增加。综合这项研究的尝试主要集中在西方进行的研究上。我们对中国的LGBTQ研究进行了回顾,以阐明文献中的趋势和差距,并为未来的研究提供基础。方法:我们检索文献,使用PsycINFO以及对2011-2018年间发表的15种英语LGBTQ特定期刊的文章标题和摘要的评论,确定针对中国LGBTQ人群的研究。我们使用万方数据库来识别2011-2018年间发表在任何期刊上的中文LGBTQ研究文章。每篇文章都按主题、研究类型、省份和样本进行了编码。结果:这些搜索得出了2011年至2018年间在中国进行的798项LGBTQ研究。艾滋病毒/艾滋病、性行为和LGBTQ特定问题(如出柜)的研究频率最高。大多数文章关注的是性少数群体男性(69.5%),而关注性少数群体女性(15.5%)或变性人(2.6%)的文章比例较小。在排除了对艾滋病毒或其他性传播感染的研究后,这种差距缩小了。研究的地理分布不均衡;大多数是在经济发达地区进行的。结论:本研究确定了中国LGBTQ研究的差距和趋势,并强调了优先和研究不足的主题,以指导未来的LGBTQ的研究。对这些研究不足的人群和主题进行更多的研究将有助于了解LGBTQ人群。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Coping and Social Support in Relation to Minority Stress and Cigarette Smoking Among Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Veterans Perceptions of a Cardiovascular Risk Reduction Intervention for Sexual Minority Adults “By Us, for Us”: Qualitative Insights to Inform Implementation of Comprehensive Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Services in a Trans Community Center “Neutrality Is Affirming”: How Do Sexual and Gender Minority Adults Find and Define Affirming Healthcare? The Experiences of Sexual and Gender Minority Participants With a Remote Biospecimen Collection Protocol
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1