Who Should Carry Guns on Campus? Assessing Variations in Support for Campus Carry Across Campus Community Membership Status

IF 2.3 3区 心理学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Journal of School Violence Pub Date : 2022-06-09 DOI:10.1080/15388220.2022.2081854
Nathan E. Kruis, Katherine McLean, Bobur Rakhmatullaev, David Bish
{"title":"Who Should Carry Guns on Campus? Assessing Variations in Support for Campus Carry Across Campus Community Membership Status","authors":"Nathan E. Kruis, Katherine McLean, Bobur Rakhmatullaev, David Bish","doi":"10.1080/15388220.2022.2081854","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This exploratory study used data collected from a representative sample of 522 Pennsylvania residents and 238 Pennsylvania college students to measure attitudes toward four different types of campus carry (CC) – student, faculty, staff, and universal carry. Findings indicated that a slight majority of both samples believed that armed staff and armed faculty members would be able to neutralize a threat is one arose on a college campus. However, both samples were unconfident in the threat neutralization abilities of armed students. Generally, findings indicated that both samples were unsupportive of any form of CC, although there was greater support indicated for faculty and staff CC than for student or universal CC. Multivariable modeling indicated that gun socialization, political beliefs, and orientations toward law enforcement, were the strongest predictors of support for CC, while gun knowledge exhibited a moderately-strong relationship in some models. Implications based on these findings are discussed within.","PeriodicalId":47428,"journal":{"name":"Journal of School Violence","volume":"21 1","pages":"266 - 280"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of School Violence","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15388220.2022.2081854","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT This exploratory study used data collected from a representative sample of 522 Pennsylvania residents and 238 Pennsylvania college students to measure attitudes toward four different types of campus carry (CC) – student, faculty, staff, and universal carry. Findings indicated that a slight majority of both samples believed that armed staff and armed faculty members would be able to neutralize a threat is one arose on a college campus. However, both samples were unconfident in the threat neutralization abilities of armed students. Generally, findings indicated that both samples were unsupportive of any form of CC, although there was greater support indicated for faculty and staff CC than for student or universal CC. Multivariable modeling indicated that gun socialization, political beliefs, and orientations toward law enforcement, were the strongest predictors of support for CC, while gun knowledge exhibited a moderately-strong relationship in some models. Implications based on these findings are discussed within.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
谁应该在校园里持枪?评估支持跨校园社区成员身份的变化
摘要这项探索性研究使用了从522名宾夕法尼亚州居民和238名宾夕法尼亚州大学生的代表性样本中收集的数据,来衡量对四种不同类型的校园携带(CC)的态度——学生、教师、员工和普遍携带。调查结果表明,这两个样本中的绝大多数都认为武装工作人员和武装教员能够消除大学校园中出现的威胁。然而,这两个样本都对武装学生的威胁消除能力没有信心。总体而言,研究结果表明,两个样本都不支持任何形式的CC,尽管对教职员工CC的支持比对学生或普遍CC的支持更大。多变量模型表明,枪支社会化、政治信仰和执法取向是支持CC的最强预测因素,而枪支知识在一些模型中表现出中等强度的关系。基于这些发现的影响在中进行了讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
8.30%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: The Journal of School Violence is a multi-disciplinary, quarterly journal that publishes peer-reviewed empirical studies related to school violence and victimization. Accepting a variety of social science methodologies, this international journal explores the broad range of contemporary issues centering on violence in the school environment. These issues often include, but are not limited to, the nature, extent, prevention, and consequences of school violence for students, teachers, and staff of all manner of educational systems.
期刊最新文献
A 12-Year Population-Based Analysis of Victimization and Climate Trends in Israeli Arab and Jewish Elementary Schools The Relationship Between Gender, Training, Experience and Acceptance of Myths About Intimate Partner Violence Against Women and Willingness to Intervene Among University Students in Spain School Violence in the Israeli Arab Educational System: Investigating the Implications of Paternalistic Leadership and teachers’ Job Satisfaction Australian Teachers’ Perceptions of Safety, Violence and Limited Support in Their Workplaces Disorderly to whom? A critical analysis of school-based disorderly conduct referrals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1