Introduction to a Roundtable on Teaching Human Rights History

IF 0.5 Q3 AREA STUDIES American Review of Canadian Studies Pub Date : 2023-01-02 DOI:10.1080/02722011.2023.2172888
Nicolas G. Virtue
{"title":"Introduction to a Roundtable on Teaching Human Rights History","authors":"Nicolas G. Virtue","doi":"10.1080/02722011.2023.2172888","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When participants in the Revisiting Human Rights workshop gathered at the London, Ontario campus of King’s University College in early May 2022, the atmosphere felt celebratory. For many of us, it was our first in-person conference since before the COVID-19 pandemic. But the workshop was also a celebration of the growth of human rights history as an academic field of inquiry and instruction. This growth is reflected in the newly launched Human Rights Studies program at King’s, where the workshop was held. This new co-disciplinary program was conceived to combine historical-political studies of human rights with philosophical-ethical and literary-cultural perspectives. In Ontario alone, ten universities now feature some form of interdisciplinary human rights program, with varying levels of historical content and expertise. In addition to these programs, an increasing number of history departments across Ontario now include faculty who research, publish, and teach on human rights. Despite this remarkable growth, the literature on teaching human rights history and the pedagogical networks between educators in the field are underdeveloped. Publications and online resources on Human Rights Education (HRE) tend to be geared toward primary and secondary education as opposed to university-level teaching or programming (Cargas and Mitoma 2019, 276). Given the focus of HRE on individual empowerment in the present and change in the future, its historical component has at times been minimized or relegated to mere background status. As a result, some human rights educators consider history to be an “optional” element of HRE (Mihr 2015, 537–40). Nonetheless, recent efforts to develop a critical pedagogy of human rights in higher education have acknowledged the important roles that historical approaches and content can play in critiquing and improving the modern human rights regime (Kingston 2018; Cargas 2019). Some publications have focused more specifically on the pedagogy of human rights history: a team of German and American educators have outlined an approach that seeks to integrate history learning and HRE in secondary, postsecondary, and public settings (Lücke et al. 2016); and The Routledge History of Human Rights concludes with a chapter on teaching human rights history in an American undergraduate classroom (Frazier 2019). Seeking to add to this emerging literature on the pedagogy of human rights history in a higher education context, this roundtable discussion offers a Canadian perspective. As part of the Revisiting Human Rights workshop, the Roundtable on Teaching Human","PeriodicalId":43336,"journal":{"name":"American Review of Canadian Studies","volume":"53 1","pages":"101 - 106"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Review of Canadian Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02722011.2023.2172888","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

When participants in the Revisiting Human Rights workshop gathered at the London, Ontario campus of King’s University College in early May 2022, the atmosphere felt celebratory. For many of us, it was our first in-person conference since before the COVID-19 pandemic. But the workshop was also a celebration of the growth of human rights history as an academic field of inquiry and instruction. This growth is reflected in the newly launched Human Rights Studies program at King’s, where the workshop was held. This new co-disciplinary program was conceived to combine historical-political studies of human rights with philosophical-ethical and literary-cultural perspectives. In Ontario alone, ten universities now feature some form of interdisciplinary human rights program, with varying levels of historical content and expertise. In addition to these programs, an increasing number of history departments across Ontario now include faculty who research, publish, and teach on human rights. Despite this remarkable growth, the literature on teaching human rights history and the pedagogical networks between educators in the field are underdeveloped. Publications and online resources on Human Rights Education (HRE) tend to be geared toward primary and secondary education as opposed to university-level teaching or programming (Cargas and Mitoma 2019, 276). Given the focus of HRE on individual empowerment in the present and change in the future, its historical component has at times been minimized or relegated to mere background status. As a result, some human rights educators consider history to be an “optional” element of HRE (Mihr 2015, 537–40). Nonetheless, recent efforts to develop a critical pedagogy of human rights in higher education have acknowledged the important roles that historical approaches and content can play in critiquing and improving the modern human rights regime (Kingston 2018; Cargas 2019). Some publications have focused more specifically on the pedagogy of human rights history: a team of German and American educators have outlined an approach that seeks to integrate history learning and HRE in secondary, postsecondary, and public settings (Lücke et al. 2016); and The Routledge History of Human Rights concludes with a chapter on teaching human rights history in an American undergraduate classroom (Frazier 2019). Seeking to add to this emerging literature on the pedagogy of human rights history in a higher education context, this roundtable discussion offers a Canadian perspective. As part of the Revisiting Human Rights workshop, the Roundtable on Teaching Human
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人权史教学圆桌会议介绍
2022年5月初,当“重新审视人权”研讨会的参与者聚集在国王大学学院安大略省伦敦校区时,气氛充满了庆祝的气氛。对我们许多人来说,这是我们自COVID-19大流行之前以来的第一次面对面会议。但这次研讨会也是对人权史作为一个学术研究和教学领域的发展的庆祝。这种增长反映在国王学院新推出的人权研究项目上,研讨会就是在那里举行的。这个新的跨学科项目的设想是将人权的历史-政治研究与哲学-伦理和文学-文化观点结合起来。仅在安大略省,就有10所大学开设了某种形式的跨学科人权课程,其历史内容和专业知识水平各不相同。除了这些项目之外,安大略省越来越多的历史系现在都有研究、出版和教授人权的教师。尽管有这种显著的增长,关于人权历史教学的文献和该领域教育者之间的教学网络仍不发达。关于人权教育的出版物和在线资源往往面向中小学教育,而不是大学水平的教学或编程(Cargas and Mitoma 2019, 276)。鉴于人力资源管理的重点是当前的个人赋权和未来的变化,其历史成分有时被最小化或降级为纯粹的背景地位。因此,一些人权教育者认为历史是人类人权的“可选”要素(Mihr 2015, 537-40)。尽管如此,最近在高等教育中发展批判性人权教学法的努力已经认识到,历史方法和内容在批评和改进现代人权制度方面可以发挥重要作用(Kingston 2018;Cargas 2019)。一些出版物更具体地关注人权历史的教学法:一个由德国和美国教育家组成的团队概述了一种方法,旨在将历史学习和HRE整合到中学、高等教育和公共环境中(l cke et al. 2016);《劳特利奇人权史》最后有一章是关于在美国本科课堂上教授人权史的(弗雷泽2019)。为了在高等教育背景下增加人权历史教育学方面的新兴文献,这次圆桌讨论提供了一个加拿大的视角。作为重访人权讲习班的一部分,人权教育圆桌会议
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: American Nineteenth Century History is a peer-reviewed, transatlantic journal devoted to the history of the United States during the long nineteenth century. It welcomes contributions on themes and topics relating to America in this period: slavery, race and ethnicity, the Civil War and Reconstruction, military history, American nationalism, urban history, immigration and ethnicity, western history, the history of women, gender studies, African Americans and Native Americans, cultural studies and comparative pieces. In addition to articles based on original research, historiographical pieces, reassessments of historical controversies, and reappraisals of prominent events or individuals are welcome. Special issues devoted to a particular theme or topic will also be considered.
期刊最新文献
The Gender Gap and Academic Publishing in Political Science: Evidence from Canada Debating the Voting Age: How Canadian Legislators Grapple with the Federal Voting Age NORAD: In Perpetuity and Beyond Managing Federalism Through Pandemic The Right to Be Rural
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1