Letting the Music ‘Speak For Itself’? Dvořák as Strategist

IF 0.2 3区 艺术学 0 MUSIC Nineteenth-Century Music Review Pub Date : 2022-03-07 DOI:10.1017/S1479409821000501
E. Branda
{"title":"Letting the Music ‘Speak For Itself’? Dvořák as Strategist","authors":"E. Branda","doi":"10.1017/S1479409821000501","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"‘I only write music and let it speak for itself’ – such was Antonín Dvořák's attitude, according to Josef Kovařík, the composer's personal secretary in New York. Indeed, throughout his career, Dvořák seemed reluctant to share his views publicly. He did not contribute articles to Czech periodicals, his acquaintances were well aware of his dread of making public appearances and speeches, and contemporary critics often commented on his humble and unenterprising nature. Yet Dvořák was not as passive as his alleged statement to Kovařík would imply. While visiting England during the 1880s, he became particularly concerned about forging a certain kind of image for himself in the Czech lands. Not only did Dvořák take an interest in English reviews of his music, he also sent several of these critiques to his contacts at home with the request that they be reprinted in Czech translation in the newspapers and journals of Prague. He proved to be equally strategic in some of his other professional choices, including the surprising decision to dedicate his patriotic cantata Hymnus: Heirs of the White Mountain ‘to the English people’, which can be understood as a clever tactical ploy, meant to signal the composer's international credentials to audiences at home. Drawing upon various letters and the many excerpted English reviews that appeared in the Czech press, this article shows that Dvořák played an active part in determining which aspects of his reception in England would be relayed to the Czech public. More broadly, the article examines Dvořák's role as strategist – an aspect of the composer's career that has remained largely unexplored. Ultimately, Dvořák was mindful of what Michael Beckerman calls ‘the public-relations aspect of nationalism’, and the suggestion that he was content simply to let the music ‘speak for itself’ does not tell the whole story.","PeriodicalId":41351,"journal":{"name":"Nineteenth-Century Music Review","volume":"19 1","pages":"599 - 624"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nineteenth-Century Music Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1479409821000501","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MUSIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

‘I only write music and let it speak for itself’ – such was Antonín Dvořák's attitude, according to Josef Kovařík, the composer's personal secretary in New York. Indeed, throughout his career, Dvořák seemed reluctant to share his views publicly. He did not contribute articles to Czech periodicals, his acquaintances were well aware of his dread of making public appearances and speeches, and contemporary critics often commented on his humble and unenterprising nature. Yet Dvořák was not as passive as his alleged statement to Kovařík would imply. While visiting England during the 1880s, he became particularly concerned about forging a certain kind of image for himself in the Czech lands. Not only did Dvořák take an interest in English reviews of his music, he also sent several of these critiques to his contacts at home with the request that they be reprinted in Czech translation in the newspapers and journals of Prague. He proved to be equally strategic in some of his other professional choices, including the surprising decision to dedicate his patriotic cantata Hymnus: Heirs of the White Mountain ‘to the English people’, which can be understood as a clever tactical ploy, meant to signal the composer's international credentials to audiences at home. Drawing upon various letters and the many excerpted English reviews that appeared in the Czech press, this article shows that Dvořák played an active part in determining which aspects of his reception in England would be relayed to the Czech public. More broadly, the article examines Dvořák's role as strategist – an aspect of the composer's career that has remained largely unexplored. Ultimately, Dvořák was mindful of what Michael Beckerman calls ‘the public-relations aspect of nationalism’, and the suggestion that he was content simply to let the music ‘speak for itself’ does not tell the whole story.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
让音乐“自己说话”?Dvořák作为战略家
作曲家Antonín Dvořák在纽约的私人秘书Josef Kovařík表示,“我只写音乐,让它自己说话”——这就是他的态度。事实上,在他的整个职业生涯中,德沃夏克似乎不愿意公开分享他的观点。他没有在捷克期刊上发表文章,他的熟人很清楚他害怕公开露面和演讲,当代评论家经常评论他谦逊和不进取的本性。然而,德沃夏克并不像他所谓的对科瓦夏克的声明所暗示的那样被动。19世纪80年代访问英国时,他特别关注在捷克土地上为自己塑造某种形象。Dvořák不仅对自己音乐的英文评论感兴趣,他还将其中几篇评论发送给了家里的联系人,要求在布拉格的报纸和期刊上以捷克语翻译转载。事实证明,他在其他一些职业选择上也同样具有战略眼光,包括出人意料地决定将他的爱国康塔塔赞美诗《白山的继承人》献给“英国人民”,这可以被理解为一种巧妙的战术策略,旨在向国内观众展示这位作曲家的国际声誉。根据捷克媒体上出现的各种信件和许多摘录的英文评论,这篇文章表明,德沃夏克在决定他在英国受到的欢迎的哪些方面将传达给捷克公众方面发挥了积极作用。更广泛地说,这篇文章考察了德沃夏克作为战略家的角色——这是作曲家职业生涯中基本上尚未探索的一个方面。最终,德沃夏克注意到了迈克尔·贝克曼所说的“民族主义的公共关系方面”,而他满足于让音乐“为自己说话”的说法并不能说明全部情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
66.70%
发文量
58
期刊最新文献
Richard Strauss Online Nineteenth-Century Women in Music: MuGI, Sophie Drinker, Art Song Augmented and BID Letting the Lark Ascend: Vaughan Williams's ‘Most Popular Work’ and the Limits of Revisionism Delphine von Schauroth, Corinna-Sister From Musical Writings To Writing Music: Book-Writing Leading to Music School in Nineteenth-Century Calcutta
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1