Incest. Penal-Law and Criminological Aspects

K. Nazar
{"title":"Incest. Penal-Law and Criminological Aspects","authors":"K. Nazar","doi":"10.26399/iusnovum.v16.2.2022.11-k.nazar","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary The article discusses the statutory features of the offence of incest in the Polish Penal Code from 1997 (Article 201) and the results of empirical research carried out. Doubts were raised in doctrine about the rationalization of the prohibition of incest and the definition of the object of protection of this crime. The conduct that constitutes the actus reus as well as the subject and the subjective side of the offence of incest were also analysed. The research material was the files of cases under Article 201 of the Penal Code registered in all public prosecutor’s offices in Poland in 2013–2014 (389 cases). Research was intended to was primarily to identify the criminological picture of the offence of incest and its scale compared to total crime figures in Poland and the policy of punishing. The next aim of the research was to characterise the families, in which incestuous acts took place, and thus to answer the key questions in this context: whether incest is a factor determining the so-called family pathology or maybe it is a phenomenon conditioned by it and whether it occurs spontaneously or is connected with sexual violence in the family. The results of the research show that the so-called “regular incest” (voluntary on both sides), qualified only under Article 201 of the Polish Penal Code, is relatively rare in the practice of the judiciary. Most cases of incestuous sexual relations were combined with the crime type of sexual abuse of a minor or rape. These results seem to confirm the thesis that incest is rarely the only committed offence, but is most often related to domestic sexual violence. They also support the thesis that incest is a phenomenon conditioned by already existing family dysfunctionality, not its cause.","PeriodicalId":33501,"journal":{"name":"Ius Novum","volume":"16 1","pages":"20 - 36"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ius Novum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26399/iusnovum.v16.2.2022.11-k.nazar","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Summary The article discusses the statutory features of the offence of incest in the Polish Penal Code from 1997 (Article 201) and the results of empirical research carried out. Doubts were raised in doctrine about the rationalization of the prohibition of incest and the definition of the object of protection of this crime. The conduct that constitutes the actus reus as well as the subject and the subjective side of the offence of incest were also analysed. The research material was the files of cases under Article 201 of the Penal Code registered in all public prosecutor’s offices in Poland in 2013–2014 (389 cases). Research was intended to was primarily to identify the criminological picture of the offence of incest and its scale compared to total crime figures in Poland and the policy of punishing. The next aim of the research was to characterise the families, in which incestuous acts took place, and thus to answer the key questions in this context: whether incest is a factor determining the so-called family pathology or maybe it is a phenomenon conditioned by it and whether it occurs spontaneously or is connected with sexual violence in the family. The results of the research show that the so-called “regular incest” (voluntary on both sides), qualified only under Article 201 of the Polish Penal Code, is relatively rare in the practice of the judiciary. Most cases of incestuous sexual relations were combined with the crime type of sexual abuse of a minor or rape. These results seem to confirm the thesis that incest is rarely the only committed offence, but is most often related to domestic sexual violence. They also support the thesis that incest is a phenomenon conditioned by already existing family dysfunctionality, not its cause.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
乱伦。刑法和犯罪学方面
摘要本文讨论了1997年《波兰刑法》(第201条)中乱伦罪的法定特征以及实证研究的结果。有人对禁止乱伦的合理化和这一罪行的保护对象的定义表示怀疑。分析了乱伦犯罪的行为构成、主体和主观方面。研究材料是2013-2014年波兰所有检察官办公室根据《刑法典》第201条登记的案件档案(389起案件)。研究的目的主要是确定乱伦犯罪的犯罪学情况及其与波兰犯罪总数的对比规模和惩罚政策。这项研究的下一个目的是描述发生乱伦行为的家庭,从而回答这方面的关键问题:乱伦是决定所谓家庭病理的一个因素,还是可能是一种受其制约的现象,以及它是自发发生的还是与家庭中的性暴力有关。研究结果表明,只有根据《波兰刑法典》第201条才有资格的所谓“定期乱伦”(双方自愿)在司法实践中相对罕见。大多数乱伦性关系案件都与性虐待未成年人或强奸的犯罪类型相结合。这些结果似乎证实了乱伦很少是唯一的犯罪行为,但最常见的是与家庭性暴力有关。他们还支持这样一种论点,即乱伦是一种由已经存在的家庭功能障碍制约的现象,而不是其原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Paradox of Democratic Strengthening: Criminalisation of Political Terrorism as a Legal Discrediting Mechanism The Attack on the Protected Legal Interest: A Criminalisation Principle and an Element of the Criminal Offence? Amendment to the Rights and Obligations of a Journalist in Act: Press Law from the Perspective of Conscience Clause Key Elements of the Criminal Law Conflict System, with Special Reference to Spanish Criminal Law On the Concept of an Appellate Measure in a Criminal Proceeding
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1