Breadwinner, bread maker: the gender division of labour in 1930s rural Italy

IF 1.2 1区 历史学 Q3 ECONOMICS European Review of Economic History Pub Date : 2023-05-02 DOI:10.1093/ereh/head009
G. Mancini
{"title":"Breadwinner, bread maker: the gender division of labour in 1930s rural Italy","authors":"G. Mancini","doi":"10.1093/ereh/head009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper uses microdata assembled from a collection of family monographs to examine female work among rural households in interwar Italy. It finds that female employment in agriculture was very high (approximately 80 percent), which contradicts available estimates from population censuses (50 percent or less). Yet despite the pervasiveness of female work, time use remained extremely segregated by gender—women devoted less than half as many hours as men to paid work, instead specializing in producing services for the family. These results substantiate the calls for caution in interpreting standard labour market indicators, such as labour force participation, in the preindustrial past.","PeriodicalId":51703,"journal":{"name":"European Review of Economic History","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Review of Economic History","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ereh/head009","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper uses microdata assembled from a collection of family monographs to examine female work among rural households in interwar Italy. It finds that female employment in agriculture was very high (approximately 80 percent), which contradicts available estimates from population censuses (50 percent or less). Yet despite the pervasiveness of female work, time use remained extremely segregated by gender—women devoted less than half as many hours as men to paid work, instead specializing in producing services for the family. These results substantiate the calls for caution in interpreting standard labour market indicators, such as labour force participation, in the preindustrial past.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
面包匠Breadwinner:20世纪30年代意大利农村的性别分工
本文使用从家庭专著集合中收集的微观数据来考察两次世界大战之间意大利农村家庭中的女性工作。报告发现,农业领域的女性就业率非常高(约为80%),这与人口普查的现有估计(50%或更低)相矛盾。然而,尽管女性工作无处不在,但时间的使用仍然因性别而严重隔离——女性从事有偿工作的时间不到男性的一半,而是专门为家庭提供服务。这些结果证实了在解释工业化前的过去的标准劳动力市场指标(如劳动力参与率)时需要谨慎的呼吁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
15
期刊介绍: European Review of Economic History has established itself as a major outlet for high-quality research in economic history, which is accessible to readers from a variety of different backgrounds. The Review publishes articles on a wide range of topics in European, comparative and world economic history. Contributions shed new light on existing debates, raise new or previously neglected topics and provide fresh perspectives from comparative research. The Review includes full-length articles, shorter articles, notes and comments, debates, survey articles, and review articles. It also publishes notes and announcements from the European Historical Economics Society.
期刊最新文献
Numeracy and the legacy of slavery: age-heaping in the Danish West Indies before and after emancipation from slavery, 1780s–1880s Age structure and age heaping: solving Ireland’s post-famine digit preference puzzle Wealth inequality in northwestern Anatolia under the Ottomans, 1460–1870 Can managers successfully deceive investors? Media attention and market manipulation during the Panama scandal Anatomy of a premodern state
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1