Guideline-directed medical therapy after transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair

Tetsu Tanaka, R. Kavsur, M. Spieker, C. Iliadis, C. Metze, Birthe M Brachtendorf, P. Horn, C. Zachoval, A. Sugiura, M. Kelm, S. Baldus, G. Nickenig, R. Westenfeld, R. Pfister, M. Becher
{"title":"Guideline-directed medical therapy after transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair","authors":"Tetsu Tanaka, R. Kavsur, M. Spieker, C. Iliadis, C. Metze, Birthe M Brachtendorf, P. Horn, C. Zachoval, A. Sugiura, M. Kelm, S. Baldus, G. Nickenig, R. Westenfeld, R. Pfister, M. Becher","doi":"10.1136/heartjnl-2022-320826","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective A sizeable proportion of patients with secondary mitral regurgitation (SMR) do not receive guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) for heart failure (HF). We investigated the association between the use of GDMT and mortality in patients with SMR who underwent transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER). Methods We retrospectively analysed patients with SMR and a left ventricular ejection fraction of <50% who underwent TEER at three centres. According to current HF guidelines, GDMT was defined as triple therapy consisting of beta-blockers, renin–angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs). Patients were divided into two groups: GDMT and non-GDMT groups. We calculated the propensity scores and carried out inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) analyses to compare 2-year mortality between the two groups. Results Of 463 patients, 228 (49.2%) were treated with GDMT upon discharge. IPTW-adjusted Kaplan-Meier curve showed patients with GDMT had a lower incidence of mortality than those without GDMT (19.8% vs 31.1%, p=0.011). In IPTW-adjusted Cox proportional hazards analysis, GDMT was associated with a reduced risk of 2-year mortality (HR: 0.58; 95% CI: 0.35 to 0.95; p=0.030), which was consistent among clinical subgroups. Moreover, patients with GDMT had a higher rate of left ventricular reverse remodelling at 1 year after TEER than those without GDMT. Conclusion GDMT, defined as triple therapy consisting of beta-blockers, RAS inhibitors and MRAs, was associated with a reduced risk of 2-year mortality after TEER for SMR. Optimisation of medical therapy is crucial to improve clinical outcomes in patients undergoing TEER for SMR.","PeriodicalId":9311,"journal":{"name":"British Heart Journal","volume":"108 1","pages":"1722 - 1728"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Heart Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2022-320826","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Objective A sizeable proportion of patients with secondary mitral regurgitation (SMR) do not receive guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) for heart failure (HF). We investigated the association between the use of GDMT and mortality in patients with SMR who underwent transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER). Methods We retrospectively analysed patients with SMR and a left ventricular ejection fraction of <50% who underwent TEER at three centres. According to current HF guidelines, GDMT was defined as triple therapy consisting of beta-blockers, renin–angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs). Patients were divided into two groups: GDMT and non-GDMT groups. We calculated the propensity scores and carried out inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) analyses to compare 2-year mortality between the two groups. Results Of 463 patients, 228 (49.2%) were treated with GDMT upon discharge. IPTW-adjusted Kaplan-Meier curve showed patients with GDMT had a lower incidence of mortality than those without GDMT (19.8% vs 31.1%, p=0.011). In IPTW-adjusted Cox proportional hazards analysis, GDMT was associated with a reduced risk of 2-year mortality (HR: 0.58; 95% CI: 0.35 to 0.95; p=0.030), which was consistent among clinical subgroups. Moreover, patients with GDMT had a higher rate of left ventricular reverse remodelling at 1 year after TEER than those without GDMT. Conclusion GDMT, defined as triple therapy consisting of beta-blockers, RAS inhibitors and MRAs, was associated with a reduced risk of 2-year mortality after TEER for SMR. Optimisation of medical therapy is crucial to improve clinical outcomes in patients undergoing TEER for SMR.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经导管边缘到边缘二尖瓣修复后的指导药物治疗
目的相当大比例的继发性二尖瓣返流(SMR)患者未接受心力衰竭(HF)的指导药物治疗(GDMT)。我们调查了接受经导管边缘到边缘修复(TEER)的SMR患者使用GDMT与死亡率之间的关系。方法我们回顾性分析了在三个中心接受TEER治疗的SMR和左心室射血分数<50%的患者。根据目前的HF指南,GDMT被定义为由β受体阻滞剂、肾素-血管紧张素系统(RAS)抑制剂和矿皮质激素受体拮抗剂(MRAs)组成的三联疗法。患者分为GDMT组和非GDMT组。我们计算倾向得分,并进行治疗加权逆概率(IPTW)分析,比较两组的2年死亡率。结果463例患者中,228例(49.2%)在出院时接受了GDMT治疗。经iptw校正的Kaplan-Meier曲线显示,GDMT患者的死亡率低于未GDMT患者(19.8% vs 31.1%, p=0.011)。在iptw校正的Cox比例风险分析中,GDMT与2年死亡风险降低相关(HR: 0.58;95% CI: 0.35 ~ 0.95;P =0.030),这在临床亚组中是一致的。此外,与没有GDMT的患者相比,有GDMT的患者在TEER后1年的左心室反向重构率更高。结论GDMT,定义为由β受体阻滞剂、RAS抑制剂和MRAs组成的三联疗法,与SMR患者TEER后2年死亡率降低相关。优化药物治疗对于改善因SMR而接受TEER治疗的患者的临床结果至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A retrospective review of empiric acyclovir prescribing practices for suspected viral central nervous system infections: A single-centre study. Cortical Morphology in Cannabis Use Disorder: Implications for Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Treatment. Socioeconomic status and entrepreneurial networking responses to the COVID-19 crisis. Cardiac microstructural alterations measured by echocardiography identify sex-specific risk for heart failure. Aspirin
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1