Social Media Debate Position 1: Against the Use of Social Media as a Credible Source of Information

Hana Beckerle, Rachel Finston, Benjamin Sussman
{"title":"Social Media Debate Position 1: Against the Use of Social Media as a Credible Source of Information","authors":"Hana Beckerle, Rachel Finston, Benjamin Sussman","doi":"10.1080/10875301.2021.1937438","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract There are ongoing conversations among information professionals on whether social media can be considered a credible source of information. The very features of social media platforms that make them attractive to users, such as their ability to create and share content, also make these platforms very open to false and misleading content, which calls all content on these platforms into question. The platforms themselves have not yet perfected moderation processes to filter out all misleading and harmful misinformation. This paper contends that for these and other reasons, the social media landscape in its current state cannot be considered a credible source of information. These issues negatively affect user expectations; however, the platforms continue to attract users and thereby present opportunities for misinformation to cause harm. All of these concerns affect the efforts of information professionals to instruct users on identifying false content, as well as the online behavior of these information organizations themselves. This paper discusses the issues of mis- and dis-information and lack of effective content moderation, and examines how information professionals and other users are affected by these issues.","PeriodicalId":35377,"journal":{"name":"Internet Reference Services Quarterly","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10875301.2021.1937438","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internet Reference Services Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10875301.2021.1937438","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Abstract There are ongoing conversations among information professionals on whether social media can be considered a credible source of information. The very features of social media platforms that make them attractive to users, such as their ability to create and share content, also make these platforms very open to false and misleading content, which calls all content on these platforms into question. The platforms themselves have not yet perfected moderation processes to filter out all misleading and harmful misinformation. This paper contends that for these and other reasons, the social media landscape in its current state cannot be considered a credible source of information. These issues negatively affect user expectations; however, the platforms continue to attract users and thereby present opportunities for misinformation to cause harm. All of these concerns affect the efforts of information professionals to instruct users on identifying false content, as well as the online behavior of these information organizations themselves. This paper discusses the issues of mis- and dis-information and lack of effective content moderation, and examines how information professionals and other users are affected by these issues.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社交媒体辩论立场1:反对将社交媒体作为可靠的信息来源
摘要信息专业人士正在就社交媒体是否可以被视为可靠的信息来源进行对话。社交媒体平台吸引用户的特性,例如创建和共享内容的能力,也使这些平台对虚假和误导性内容非常开放,这让这些平台上的所有内容都受到质疑。这些平台本身还没有完善审核程序,以过滤掉所有误导和有害的错误信息。本文认为,由于这些和其他原因,社交媒体现状不能被视为可靠的信息来源。这些问题会对用户的期望产生负面影响;然而,这些平台继续吸引用户,从而为错误信息造成伤害提供了机会。所有这些担忧都影响了信息专业人员指导用户识别虚假内容的努力,以及这些信息组织自身的在线行为。本文讨论了信息错误和不完整以及缺乏有效的内容审核的问题,并考察了信息专业人员和其他用户如何受到这些问题的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Internet Reference Services Quarterly
Internet Reference Services Quarterly Social Sciences-Library and Information Sciences
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊介绍: Internet Reference Services Quarterly tackles the tough job of keeping librarians up to date with the latest developments in Internet referencing and librarianship. This peer-reviewed quarterly journal is designed to function as a comprehensive information source librarians can turn to and count on for keeping up-to-date on emerging technological innovations, while emphasizing theoretical, research, and practical applications of Internet-related information services, sources, and resources. Librarians from any size or type of library in any discipline get the knowledge needed on how to best improve service through one of the most powerful reference tools available on the Internet.
期刊最新文献
Enriching Bibliographic Records Using AI – A Pilot by Ex Libris Use and Impact of Artificial Intelligence in Philippine Higher Education: Reflections from Instructors and Administrators “ChatGPT Assists Me in My Reference List:” Exploring the Chatbot’s Potential as Citation Formatting Tool Information Literacy Instruction Services at Rural Community Colleges, Fall 2019 Through AY 2021/22 “Don’t Let Grammarly Overwrite Your Style and Voice:” Writers’ Advice on Using Grammarly in Writing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1