The Varying Returns to Diversification Along the Value Chain

IF 2.9 Q2 MANAGEMENT Strategy Science Pub Date : 2022-07-20 DOI:10.1287/stsc.2022.0171
Ekaterina V. Karniouchina, Stephen J. Carson, W. L. Moore, Kumar R. Sarangee, Can Uslay
{"title":"The Varying Returns to Diversification Along the Value Chain","authors":"Ekaterina V. Karniouchina, Stephen J. Carson, W. L. Moore, Kumar R. Sarangee, Can Uslay","doi":"10.1287/stsc.2022.0171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examines whether the benefits of diversification vary across different value chain activities. The returns to diversification in product development and distribution activities are analyzed using a framework grounded in the intraindustry diversification literature and the resource-based view (RBV) of the firm. The study uses data from cocreation arrangements in the motion picture industry in which value chain activities are nearly decomposable—that is, split across producers and distributors—as a natural field study. Results based on 779 movies linked to 57 different production studios and distributed via 30 unaffiliated distributors or vertically integrated distribution branches show that greater focus in film production has a positive effect on profitability, whereas the level of focus/diversification in distribution is unrelated to profitability. This result holds regardless of whether the two functions are carried out within an integrated organization or across independent firms. Moreover, there is significant heterogeneity in the extent to which production studios benefit from increased focus which is tied to the composition of their product portfolios.","PeriodicalId":45295,"journal":{"name":"Strategy Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Strategy Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1287/stsc.2022.0171","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines whether the benefits of diversification vary across different value chain activities. The returns to diversification in product development and distribution activities are analyzed using a framework grounded in the intraindustry diversification literature and the resource-based view (RBV) of the firm. The study uses data from cocreation arrangements in the motion picture industry in which value chain activities are nearly decomposable—that is, split across producers and distributors—as a natural field study. Results based on 779 movies linked to 57 different production studios and distributed via 30 unaffiliated distributors or vertically integrated distribution branches show that greater focus in film production has a positive effect on profitability, whereas the level of focus/diversification in distribution is unrelated to profitability. This result holds regardless of whether the two functions are carried out within an integrated organization or across independent firms. Moreover, there is significant heterogeneity in the extent to which production studios benefit from increased focus which is tied to the composition of their product portfolios.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
价值链多元化的不同回报
本研究探讨多元化的效益是否在不同的价值链活动中有所不同。使用基于行业内多元化文献和企业资源基础观点(RBV)的框架来分析产品开发和分销活动的多元化回报。该研究使用了电影行业共同创造安排的数据,其中价值链活动几乎是可分解的——也就是说,在制片人和分销商之间分裂——作为一个自然的实地研究。基于与57个不同制作工作室联系并通过30个独立发行商或垂直整合发行分支机构发行的779部电影的结果表明,对电影制作的更大关注对盈利能力有积极影响,而发行的关注/多样化水平与盈利能力无关。无论这两个职能是在一个整合的组织内执行还是在独立的公司中执行,这个结果都成立。此外,制作工作室从与产品组合相关的关注中获益的程度也存在显著的异质性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Strategy Science
Strategy Science MANAGEMENT-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
5.10%
发文量
31
期刊最新文献
Airline Responses to the COVID-19 Collapse: Applying Learning to an Unprecedented Crisis Innovation Disclosures and the Design of Technology Acquisition Contracts: Evidence from the American Inventors Protection Act How Demand Shocks “Jumpstart” Technological Ecosystems and Commercialization: Evidence from the Global Electric Vehicle Industry How Firms Cultivate Collaboration During Postmerger Integration of Technology Acquisitions Who Captures the Value from Organizational Ratings?: Evidence from Public Schools
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1