Let’s Clearly Distinguish Evidence-based Practice and Empirically Supported Treatments

IF 1.4 Q2 SOCIAL WORK SMITH COLLEGE STUDIES IN SOCIAL WORK Pub Date : 2019-10-02 DOI:10.1080/00377317.2019.1706316
J. Drisko, A. Friedman
{"title":"Let’s Clearly Distinguish Evidence-based Practice and Empirically Supported Treatments","authors":"J. Drisko, A. Friedman","doi":"10.1080/00377317.2019.1706316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Evidence based practice [EBP] has had a strong influence on social work practice, research, and education. EBP is a multi-step process for health care decision making which includes relevant research findings in treatment planning together with the client’s preferences and clinical expertise. An empirically supported treatments [EST] is a designation for treatments for a given disorder that have met specific standards for research quality. ESTs are often part of the EBP process but are not identical to it. This article reports results from a review of relevant 200 articles from the Social Work Abstracts database, showing social workers fail to distinguish the two concepts, and often fail to define them fully and clearly. More published reports conflate ESTs with EBP than correctly distinguish the two concepts. Recommendation to strengthen future social work publications, practice and education are offered.","PeriodicalId":45273,"journal":{"name":"SMITH COLLEGE STUDIES IN SOCIAL WORK","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00377317.2019.1706316","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SMITH COLLEGE STUDIES IN SOCIAL WORK","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00377317.2019.1706316","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

ABSTRACT Evidence based practice [EBP] has had a strong influence on social work practice, research, and education. EBP is a multi-step process for health care decision making which includes relevant research findings in treatment planning together with the client’s preferences and clinical expertise. An empirically supported treatments [EST] is a designation for treatments for a given disorder that have met specific standards for research quality. ESTs are often part of the EBP process but are not identical to it. This article reports results from a review of relevant 200 articles from the Social Work Abstracts database, showing social workers fail to distinguish the two concepts, and often fail to define them fully and clearly. More published reports conflate ESTs with EBP than correctly distinguish the two concepts. Recommendation to strengthen future social work publications, practice and education are offered.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
让我们明确区分基于证据的实践和经验支持的治疗方法
循证实践对社会工作实践、研究和教育产生了巨大的影响。EBP是一个多步骤的医疗保健决策过程,包括治疗计划中的相关研究结果以及客户的偏好和临床专业知识。经验支持的治疗方法[EST]是对符合特定研究质量标准的特定疾病的治疗方法的指定。EST通常是EBP过程的一部分,但与之不同。本文报告了对社会工作摘要数据库中相关200篇文章的审查结果,表明社会工作者无法区分这两个概念,而且往往无法全面、清晰地定义它们。更多已发表的报告将无害环境技术与EBP混为一谈,而不是正确区分这两个概念。提出了加强未来社会工作出版物、实践和教育的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
10
期刊介绍: Smith College Studies in Social Work focuses on the vital issues facing practitioners today, featuring only those articles that advance theoretical understanding of psychological and social functioning, present clinically relevant research findings, and promote excellence in clinical practice. This refereed journal addresses issues of mental health, therapeutic process, trauma and recovery, psychopathology, racial and cultural diversity, culturally responsive clinical practice, intersubjectivity, the influence of postmodern theory on clinical practice, community based practice, and clinical services for specific populations of psychologically and socially vulnerable clients.
期刊最新文献
The Impact of the NeuroAffective Relational Model (NARM) on Client Agency “Something There is That doesn’t Love a Wall”: Notes on the Limits of Risk-Based Boundary Norms in Clinical Social Work Exploring the Radical Potential of Queer AZN and Pasifika CRT for Clinical Social Work Praxis “Angry at the Wrong Thing:” Queering Ketamine Assisted Psychotherapy for Clients Experiencing Body Image and Eating Distress Homeless and Hospitalized: A Case Study of Intervention to Support Collaborative Behavior and Safety
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1