{"title":"Contractors’ Claims in an EPC and Turnkey Contract: Lessons Learned from a Hydropower Project","authors":"Sushmit Sharma Bhattarai, K. Kisi, R. Kayastha","doi":"10.1061/jladah.ladr-915","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study focuses on the contractor's claims on a hydropower project contracted under an international engineering procurement and construction (EPC) and turnkey contract in Nepal. The contractor faced challenges from the mobilization phase and submitted multiple claims to the employer for time extensions and additional overhead costs. This study identified 80 claims for a time extension and additional overhead costs. Through content analysis, this study grouped these claims under six categories: natural disaster, strike, unforeseen risk, material shortage, payment, and the COVID-19 pandemic. First, the study analyzed the claim type, outcome, and decision criteria of the claims. Next, the analysis presented decisions based on general conditions of contract (GCC) and the particular conditions of contract (PCC) clauses. The study found that the employer granted a time extension to most of the claims under natural disaster under force majeure and rejected most of the claims under the other five groups. Finally, the study presents findings and lessons learned from the case study, including the relevant GCC and PCC clauses used in claims resolution. The findings and lessons learned from this case study could help employers and international EPC contractors who want to build hydropower projects in Nepal. © 2022 American Society of Civil Engineers.","PeriodicalId":46126,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1061/jladah.ladr-915","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
EPC和交钥匙合同中承包商的索赔:从水电项目中吸取的经验教训
本研究的重点是承包商在尼泊尔根据国际工程采购和建设(EPC)和交钥匙合同承包的水电项目的索赔。承包商面临着动员阶段的挑战,并向雇主提出了多次延期和额外间接费用的索赔。这项研究确定了80项要求延期和额外间接费用的索赔。通过内容分析,本研究将这些索赔分为六类:自然灾害、罢工、不可预见风险、物资短缺、付款和COVID-19大流行。首先,本研究分析了索赔的类型、结果和判定标准。接下来,分析提出了基于合同一般条件(GCC)和合同特殊条件(PCC)条款的决定。研究发现,雇主批准了自然灾害和不可抗力下的大多数索赔的延期,而拒绝了其他五个类别下的大多数索赔。最后,研究报告介绍了从案例研究中获得的结论和经验教训,包括在索赔解决中使用的相关GCC和PCC条款。本案例研究的结论和经验教训可以帮助希望在尼泊尔建设水电项目的雇主和国际EPC承包商。©2022美国土木工程师学会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。