Contractors’ Claims in an EPC and Turnkey Contract: Lessons Learned from a Hydropower Project

Sushmit Sharma Bhattarai, K. Kisi, R. Kayastha
{"title":"Contractors’ Claims in an EPC and Turnkey Contract: Lessons Learned from a Hydropower Project","authors":"Sushmit Sharma Bhattarai, K. Kisi, R. Kayastha","doi":"10.1061/jladah.ladr-915","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study focuses on the contractor's claims on a hydropower project contracted under an international engineering procurement and construction (EPC) and turnkey contract in Nepal. The contractor faced challenges from the mobilization phase and submitted multiple claims to the employer for time extensions and additional overhead costs. This study identified 80 claims for a time extension and additional overhead costs. Through content analysis, this study grouped these claims under six categories: natural disaster, strike, unforeseen risk, material shortage, payment, and the COVID-19 pandemic. First, the study analyzed the claim type, outcome, and decision criteria of the claims. Next, the analysis presented decisions based on general conditions of contract (GCC) and the particular conditions of contract (PCC) clauses. The study found that the employer granted a time extension to most of the claims under natural disaster under force majeure and rejected most of the claims under the other five groups. Finally, the study presents findings and lessons learned from the case study, including the relevant GCC and PCC clauses used in claims resolution. The findings and lessons learned from this case study could help employers and international EPC contractors who want to build hydropower projects in Nepal. © 2022 American Society of Civil Engineers.","PeriodicalId":46126,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1061/jladah.ladr-915","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This study focuses on the contractor's claims on a hydropower project contracted under an international engineering procurement and construction (EPC) and turnkey contract in Nepal. The contractor faced challenges from the mobilization phase and submitted multiple claims to the employer for time extensions and additional overhead costs. This study identified 80 claims for a time extension and additional overhead costs. Through content analysis, this study grouped these claims under six categories: natural disaster, strike, unforeseen risk, material shortage, payment, and the COVID-19 pandemic. First, the study analyzed the claim type, outcome, and decision criteria of the claims. Next, the analysis presented decisions based on general conditions of contract (GCC) and the particular conditions of contract (PCC) clauses. The study found that the employer granted a time extension to most of the claims under natural disaster under force majeure and rejected most of the claims under the other five groups. Finally, the study presents findings and lessons learned from the case study, including the relevant GCC and PCC clauses used in claims resolution. The findings and lessons learned from this case study could help employers and international EPC contractors who want to build hydropower projects in Nepal. © 2022 American Society of Civil Engineers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
EPC和交钥匙合同中承包商的索赔:从水电项目中吸取的经验教训
本研究的重点是承包商在尼泊尔根据国际工程采购和建设(EPC)和交钥匙合同承包的水电项目的索赔。承包商面临着动员阶段的挑战,并向雇主提出了多次延期和额外间接费用的索赔。这项研究确定了80项要求延期和额外间接费用的索赔。通过内容分析,本研究将这些索赔分为六类:自然灾害、罢工、不可预见风险、物资短缺、付款和COVID-19大流行。首先,本研究分析了索赔的类型、结果和判定标准。接下来,分析提出了基于合同一般条件(GCC)和合同特殊条件(PCC)条款的决定。研究发现,雇主批准了自然灾害和不可抗力下的大多数索赔的延期,而拒绝了其他五个类别下的大多数索赔。最后,研究报告介绍了从案例研究中获得的结论和经验教训,包括在索赔解决中使用的相关GCC和PCC条款。本案例研究的结论和经验教训可以帮助希望在尼泊尔建设水电项目的雇主和国际EPC承包商。©2022美国土木工程师学会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
20.00%
发文量
58
期刊最新文献
Contractual Treatment of COVID-19 Induced Events under Standard International Construction Contract Conditions Critical Legal Issues Associated with Arbitration Agreement Risk Allocation and Mitigation Practices for Building Information Modeling: Addressing Legal and Contractual Risks Associated with Contract Documentation Understanding the Causes of Design Errors in Construction Projects: A DEMATEL-Based Framework Optimizing Quality Control and Assurance of Design-Build Transportation Projects through Alignment of RFP Selection Criteria with Owners Expectations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1