The role of fundamental rights in antitrust law – a special responsibility for undertakings with regulatory power under Art. 102 TFEU?

Q2 Social Sciences European Competition Journal Pub Date : 2021-04-29 DOI:10.1080/17441056.2021.1921514
Johannes Persch
{"title":"The role of fundamental rights in antitrust law – a special responsibility for undertakings with regulatory power under Art. 102 TFEU?","authors":"Johannes Persch","doi":"10.1080/17441056.2021.1921514","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper investigates what role fundamental rights can play in the interpretation of EU antitrust law, in particular Art. 102 TFEU. It spells out the difficulties that derive from the fact that antitrust law and fundamental rights are of equal ranking in the EU legal order. It concludes that nevertheless as a matter of systemic and teleological interpretation, EU antitrust law is open for fundamental rights considerations. However, recourse to fundamental rights should be taken only when companies possess regulatory power. This approach sheds light on social media platforms’ recent increased engagement in content moderation. It suggests that for dominant platforms with regulatory power, any discrimination based on political beliefs is prima facie abusive behaviour under Art. 102 TFEU. However, such conduct may be justified by the pursuit of legitimate goals and companies should be granted a wide margin of appreciation in that regard.","PeriodicalId":52118,"journal":{"name":"European Competition Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17441056.2021.1921514","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Competition Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17441056.2021.1921514","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper investigates what role fundamental rights can play in the interpretation of EU antitrust law, in particular Art. 102 TFEU. It spells out the difficulties that derive from the fact that antitrust law and fundamental rights are of equal ranking in the EU legal order. It concludes that nevertheless as a matter of systemic and teleological interpretation, EU antitrust law is open for fundamental rights considerations. However, recourse to fundamental rights should be taken only when companies possess regulatory power. This approach sheds light on social media platforms’ recent increased engagement in content moderation. It suggests that for dominant platforms with regulatory power, any discrimination based on political beliefs is prima facie abusive behaviour under Art. 102 TFEU. However, such conduct may be justified by the pursuit of legitimate goals and companies should be granted a wide margin of appreciation in that regard.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基本权利在反垄断法中的作用——根据《反垄断法》第102条具有监管权的企业的特殊责任?
摘要本文探讨了基本权利在解释欧盟反垄断法,特别是《反垄断法》第102条中的作用。它阐述了反垄断法和基本权利在欧盟法律秩序中具有同等地位这一事实所带来的困难。它的结论是,尽管如此,作为一个系统性和目的性的解释问题,欧盟反垄断法对基本权利的考虑是开放的。然而,只有当公司拥有监管权力时,才应诉诸基本权利。这种方法揭示了社交媒体平台最近越来越多地参与内容审核。它表明,对于具有监管权的占主导地位的平台来说,根据《TFEU》第102条,任何基于政治信仰的歧视都是表面上的虐待行为。然而,这种行为可以通过追求合法目标来证明是正当的,在这方面应该给予公司很大的升值幅度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Competition Journal
European Competition Journal Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊介绍: The European Competition Journal publishes outstanding scholarly articles relating to European competition law and economics. Its mission is to help foster learning and debate about how European competition law and policy can continue to develop in an economically rational way. Articles published in the Journal are subject to rigorous peer review by leading experts from around Europe. Topics include: -Vertical and Conglomerate Mergers -Enlargement of the Union - the ramifications for Competition Policy -Unilateral and Coordinated Effects in Merger Control -Modernisation of European Competition law -Cartels and Leniency.
期刊最新文献
Quality control in the DMA procedure: the exclusion of the Hearing Officer Overlooking digital collusion risks in the EU's agenda for a single European data space(s) A fair share of sustainability benefits for consumers: the Horizontal Guidelines in the silent spring Competition concerns with foundation models: a new feast for big tech? Antitrust restriction on football governance: the case of European Super League
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1