Listening to Human Rights: Class Conflict in Hanns Eisler’s Deutsche Sinfonie

IF 0.5 2区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY German History Pub Date : 2023-04-12 DOI:10.1093/gerhis/ghad015
K. Marcus
{"title":"Listening to Human Rights: Class Conflict in Hanns Eisler’s Deutsche Sinfonie","authors":"K. Marcus","doi":"10.1093/gerhis/ghad015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In what began as a piece against the Nazi concentration camps, the composer Hanns Eisler and his collaborator, the poet and playwright Bertolt Brecht, created the eleven-movement, twelve-tone Deutsche Sinfonie, Op. 50 (1935–1958) to communicate political ideas. They soon expanded it to articulate what they saw as the very roots of fascism: militarism and capitalism. To explain the problems of class conflict in Europe, Eisler and Brecht focused on two groups that were central to Marxist–Leninist ideology: peasants and industrial workers. In two movements, the Peasant Cantata (Bauernkantate) and Workers Cantata (Arbeiterkantate), they portrayed long-standing injustices that peasants and industrial workers endured in the twentieth century. Eisler thus viewed the Deutsche Sinfonie, his largest and most ambitious work, as a way of explaining the arc of modern German history—from the late nineteenth century through to the 1940s—and how the Nazis came to power. The article further argues that the Deutsche Sinfonie can be analysed in relation to the discourse on human rights, drawing on the work of Martha Nussbaum, Micheline Ishay and other human rights theorists and historians, as a contribution to what Mark Philip Bradley calls the ‘global human rights imagination’. The article explains the vital role that the Peasant Cantata and Workers Cantata had in the overall conception of the work and how human rights issues were at the core of that musical idea. To place the Deutsche Sinfonie in historical and cultural context, this interdisciplinary analysis integrates methodologies of both cultural history and musicology.","PeriodicalId":44471,"journal":{"name":"German History","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"German History","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/gerhis/ghad015","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In what began as a piece against the Nazi concentration camps, the composer Hanns Eisler and his collaborator, the poet and playwright Bertolt Brecht, created the eleven-movement, twelve-tone Deutsche Sinfonie, Op. 50 (1935–1958) to communicate political ideas. They soon expanded it to articulate what they saw as the very roots of fascism: militarism and capitalism. To explain the problems of class conflict in Europe, Eisler and Brecht focused on two groups that were central to Marxist–Leninist ideology: peasants and industrial workers. In two movements, the Peasant Cantata (Bauernkantate) and Workers Cantata (Arbeiterkantate), they portrayed long-standing injustices that peasants and industrial workers endured in the twentieth century. Eisler thus viewed the Deutsche Sinfonie, his largest and most ambitious work, as a way of explaining the arc of modern German history—from the late nineteenth century through to the 1940s—and how the Nazis came to power. The article further argues that the Deutsche Sinfonie can be analysed in relation to the discourse on human rights, drawing on the work of Martha Nussbaum, Micheline Ishay and other human rights theorists and historians, as a contribution to what Mark Philip Bradley calls the ‘global human rights imagination’. The article explains the vital role that the Peasant Cantata and Workers Cantata had in the overall conception of the work and how human rights issues were at the core of that musical idea. To place the Deutsche Sinfonie in historical and cultural context, this interdisciplinary analysis integrates methodologies of both cultural history and musicology.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
倾听人权:汉斯·艾斯勒德国小交响乐中的阶级冲突
作曲家汉斯·艾斯勒和他的合作者、诗人兼剧作家贝尔托尔特·布莱希特创作了11乐章、12音调的德国小交响乐,作品50(1935-1958),以传达政治思想。他们很快将其扩展到阐明他们所认为的法西斯主义的根源:军国主义和资本主义。为了解释欧洲的阶级冲突问题,艾斯勒和布莱希特关注了马克思列宁主义意识形态的核心两个群体:农民和工业工人。在两个运动中,农民大合唱(Bauernkantate)和工人大合唱(Arbeiterkantate),他们描绘了20世纪农民和工业工人长期遭受的不公正。因此,艾斯勒将他最大、最雄心勃勃的作品《德意志小交响乐》视为解释德国现代历史(从19世纪末到20世纪40年代)以及纳粹如何上台的一种方式。文章进一步认为,德国小交响乐可以根据玛莎·努斯鲍姆、米其琳·伊沙和其他人权理论家和历史学家的工作,结合人权话语进行分析,作为对马克·菲利普·布拉德利所说的“全球人权想象”的贡献。文章解释了《农民大合唱》和《工人大合唱》在作品整体构思中的重要作用,以及人权问题是如何成为这一音乐理念的核心。为了将德国交响乐置于历史和文化背景下,这一跨学科分析融合了文化史和音乐学的方法论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
German History
German History Multiple-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
16.70%
发文量
85
期刊介绍: German History is the journal of the German History Society and was first published in 1984. The journal offers refereed research articles, dissertation abstracts, news of interest to German historians, conference reports and a substantial book review section in four issues a year. German History’s broad ranging subject areas and high level of standards make it the top journal in its field and an essential addition to any German historian"s library.
期刊最新文献
‘Real National Work’: The Politics of Nazi Race Science in Upper Silesia, 1934–1942 Everyday Denazification in Postwar Germany: The Fragebogen and Political Screening during the Allied Occupation Beyond the Wall: East Germany, 1949–1990 Bodies in Pain: Early Modern Suicide by Proxy End Game: The 1989 Revolution in East Germany
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1