‘Invested’ partnerships as key to high quality apprenticeship programmes as evidenced in on and off the job training

IF 1.5 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of Education and Work Pub Date : 2023-02-07 DOI:10.1080/13639080.2023.2174958
M. Brockmann, Rob Smith
{"title":"‘Invested’ partnerships as key to high quality apprenticeship programmes as evidenced in on and off the job training","authors":"M. Brockmann, Rob Smith","doi":"10.1080/13639080.2023.2174958","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In England, a new model of apprenticeship was initiated in whose stated intention was to ‘put employers in the driving seat’. Regulation of the new model was focused on the mandatory 20% of apprentices’ work time allocated to off-the-job training offered by colleges and other training providers. Based on case studies of employers and training providers across a range of industry sectors, this paper brings together data from two projects researching the on-the-job and off-the-job training elements of the new model. Three contrasting modes of apprenticeship emerged: developing apprentices to become experts in an industry-wide community of practice; apprenticeship as staff development; and apprenticeship as income stream. These resulted from different forms of employer-provider collaboration, enabled through a marketized landscape of training providers, and flexibility in regulations that requires very little of employers. Utilising Fuller and Unwin’s work on expansive and restrictive environments, we found that that the new model supports a range of apprenticeships some being excellent but also others that are not worthy of the me. The paper concludes that quality apprenticeships tended to be in traditional industries and relied on strong partnerships between employers and training providers that worked against the grain of competitive market relations.","PeriodicalId":47445,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Education and Work","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Education and Work","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080.2023.2174958","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT In England, a new model of apprenticeship was initiated in whose stated intention was to ‘put employers in the driving seat’. Regulation of the new model was focused on the mandatory 20% of apprentices’ work time allocated to off-the-job training offered by colleges and other training providers. Based on case studies of employers and training providers across a range of industry sectors, this paper brings together data from two projects researching the on-the-job and off-the-job training elements of the new model. Three contrasting modes of apprenticeship emerged: developing apprentices to become experts in an industry-wide community of practice; apprenticeship as staff development; and apprenticeship as income stream. These resulted from different forms of employer-provider collaboration, enabled through a marketized landscape of training providers, and flexibility in regulations that requires very little of employers. Utilising Fuller and Unwin’s work on expansive and restrictive environments, we found that that the new model supports a range of apprenticeships some being excellent but also others that are not worthy of the me. The paper concludes that quality apprenticeships tended to be in traditional industries and relied on strong partnerships between employers and training providers that worked against the grain of competitive market relations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“投资”伙伴关系是高质量学徒计划的关键,在职和非职培训就是明证
摘要在英国,一种新的学徒制模式开始了,其既定意图是“让雇主坐在驾驶座上”。新模式的监管重点是将学徒20%的工作时间分配给大学和其他培训机构提供的非工作培训。基于对一系列行业部门的雇主和培训提供者的案例研究,本文汇集了两个项目的数据,这两个项目研究了新模式的在职和非在职培训要素。出现了三种截然不同的学徒模式:培养学徒成为全行业实践社区的专家;学徒制作为员工发展;学徒制作为收入来源。这源于不同形式的雇主-提供者合作,通过培训提供者的市场化环境实现,以及对雇主要求很低的法规灵活性。利用Fuller和Unwin在广阔和限制性环境中的工作,我们发现新模式支持一系列学徒制,有些很优秀,但也有一些不值得我学习。该论文得出的结论是,高质量的学徒制往往在传统行业,并依赖于雇主和培训提供者之间的强有力的合作伙伴关系,这与竞争性市场关系背道而驰。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Education and Work
Journal of Education and Work EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
14.30%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: The Journal of Education and Work is an international forum for academic research and policy analysis which focuses on the interplay of the education and economic systems. The journal examines how knowledge, skills, values and attitudes both about and for work and employment are developed within the education system. The journal also explores the various forms of industrial training and accreditation in the economic system, including changes in the economic and industrial infrastructure which influence the type of employees required. Work in the informal economy is also included.
期刊最新文献
Careers after COVID: examining the influence of vocational anticipatory socialization on post-pandemic career values and choices of emerging adults in the United States Survival analysis of unemployment duration: a case study of Vietnam Initiating, enacting and sustaining partnerships to inform post-school pathways Factors contributing to the (un)fulfilment of employment aspirations of recent Chilean university graduates The return to over-education in Israel: evidence from PIAAC data
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1