Similarities and differences between coparenting and parental gatekeeping: implications for father involvement research

IF 1.4 4区 社会学 Q3 FAMILY STUDIES Journal of Family Studies Pub Date : 2022-03-22 DOI:10.1080/13229400.2022.2051725
Lauren E. Altenburger
{"title":"Similarities and differences between coparenting and parental gatekeeping: implications for father involvement research","authors":"Lauren E. Altenburger","doi":"10.1080/13229400.2022.2051725","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT A family systems perspective highlights the multiple interdependent relationships that may influence fathers’ parenting and, in turn, child outcomes. Notably, coparenting, or how parents collaborate in raising the child, has been linked to father involvement. More recently, parental gatekeeping, or one parent’s efforts to manage the other parent’s interactions with the child, has been introduced as part of the coparenting relationship. Researchers have reported associations between maternal gatekeeping, including mothers’ encouragement (i.e. gate opening) and discouragement (i.e. gate closing), and fathers’ parenting. However, multidimensional models of coparenting do not explicitly identify a parental gatekeeping component. Additionally, parental gatekeeping and coparenting lines of research have been pursued relatively independently. This raises questions about how parental gatekeeping and other dimensions of the coparenting relationship may be similarly and differentially linked to fathers’ parenting. To clarify the nature of coparenting and parental gatekeeping, this article provides an overview of foundational research. Similarities and differences in the consequences of coparenting (i.e. support and undermining) and parental gatekeeping (i.e. gate opening and gate closing) for fathers’ parenting are examined. Finally, I explore how a parental gatekeeping process may operate as a feedback loop within a given family system. Implications for research and practice are discussed.","PeriodicalId":46462,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Studies","volume":"29 1","pages":"1403 - 1427"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Family Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13229400.2022.2051725","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT A family systems perspective highlights the multiple interdependent relationships that may influence fathers’ parenting and, in turn, child outcomes. Notably, coparenting, or how parents collaborate in raising the child, has been linked to father involvement. More recently, parental gatekeeping, or one parent’s efforts to manage the other parent’s interactions with the child, has been introduced as part of the coparenting relationship. Researchers have reported associations between maternal gatekeeping, including mothers’ encouragement (i.e. gate opening) and discouragement (i.e. gate closing), and fathers’ parenting. However, multidimensional models of coparenting do not explicitly identify a parental gatekeeping component. Additionally, parental gatekeeping and coparenting lines of research have been pursued relatively independently. This raises questions about how parental gatekeeping and other dimensions of the coparenting relationship may be similarly and differentially linked to fathers’ parenting. To clarify the nature of coparenting and parental gatekeeping, this article provides an overview of foundational research. Similarities and differences in the consequences of coparenting (i.e. support and undermining) and parental gatekeeping (i.e. gate opening and gate closing) for fathers’ parenting are examined. Finally, I explore how a parental gatekeeping process may operate as a feedback loop within a given family system. Implications for research and practice are discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
亲子教养与父母守门人的异同:对父亲参与研究的启示
家庭系统的观点强调了多重相互依赖的关系,这些关系可能会影响父亲的养育方式,进而影响孩子的结局。值得注意的是,父母共同抚养孩子,或者父母如何合作抚养孩子,与父亲的参与有关。最近,父母把关,或父母中的一方努力管理另一方与孩子的互动,已经作为父母关系的一部分被引入。研究人员已经报告了母亲守门(包括母亲的鼓励(即打开大门)和劝阻(即关闭大门))与父亲的养育之间的联系。然而,共同养育的多维模型并不显式地标识父级守门人组件。此外,父母把关和共同养育的研究已经相对独立地进行。这就提出了一个问题:父母的把关和父母关系的其他方面如何与父亲的养育方式相似或不同地联系在一起。为了澄清亲子关系和父母把关的本质,本文提供了基础研究的概述。研究了父母对父亲养育子女的影响(即支持和破坏)和父母把关(即打开和关闭大门)的异同。最后,我探讨了父母把关过程如何在给定的家庭系统中作为反馈循环运作。讨论了对研究和实践的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Family Studies
Journal of Family Studies FAMILY STUDIES-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
12.50%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: The Journal of Family Studies is a peer reviewed international journal under the Editorship of Adjunct Professor Lawrie Moloney, School of Public Health, LaTrobe University; Australian Institute of Family Studies; and co-director of Children in Focus. The focus of the Journal of Family Studies is on the wellbeing of children in families in the process of change.
期刊最新文献
Cisgender men’s narratives about their desires to be pregnant: re/constructing reproduction, gender, and their entanglement Good normative parenting: towards a non-teleological and relational ideal African single mothers and their children in Canada: transnational experiences and sources of support Composition of Ukrainian households under forced migration and its impact on livelihood opportunities at early stage of stay in Krakow Introduction to a special issue in memoriam Michael Rush: the politics of fatherhood around the world
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1