Going Beyond Test Scores: The Gender Gap in Italian Children’s Mathematical Capability

IF 3.3 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Feminist Economics Pub Date : 2021-06-06 DOI:10.1080/13545701.2021.1908574
M. D. Di Tommaso, Anna Maccagnan, S. Mendolia
{"title":"Going Beyond Test Scores: The Gender Gap in Italian Children’s Mathematical Capability","authors":"M. D. Di Tommaso, Anna Maccagnan, S. Mendolia","doi":"10.1080/13545701.2021.1908574","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper investigates the relationship between gender, attitudes, and test scores in mathematics. The study argues that measures of children’s capability in mathematics must include some indicators of attitudes toward the subject. These are particularly important when analyzing gender gaps because attitudes toward mathematics differ by gender. To this end, the study first analyzes the gender gap in attitudes and test scores separately using school fixed effects models. Second, it estimates a structural equation model, which takes into account that mathematical capability is a latent construct for which some indicators (test scores and attitudes) are observed. Using data from the Italian National Institute for the Evaluation of Education Systems (INVALSI) for school years 5 and 10 in 2014 and 2015, results confirm that when mathematics capability, including both attitudes and test scores, is measured, the gap between boys and girls changes, and it is therefore relevant to consider both concepts. HIGHLIGHTS Italy has one of the highest gender gaps in mathematics in the OECD. Gender gaps are substantial both in children's attitudes and their test scores. Tackling gender stereotypes may improve women's self-confidence in mathematics and the gender gap in scores. This may also help close the gender gap in STEM occupations.","PeriodicalId":47715,"journal":{"name":"Feminist Economics","volume":"27 1","pages":"161 - 187"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13545701.2021.1908574","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Feminist Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13545701.2021.1908574","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This paper investigates the relationship between gender, attitudes, and test scores in mathematics. The study argues that measures of children’s capability in mathematics must include some indicators of attitudes toward the subject. These are particularly important when analyzing gender gaps because attitudes toward mathematics differ by gender. To this end, the study first analyzes the gender gap in attitudes and test scores separately using school fixed effects models. Second, it estimates a structural equation model, which takes into account that mathematical capability is a latent construct for which some indicators (test scores and attitudes) are observed. Using data from the Italian National Institute for the Evaluation of Education Systems (INVALSI) for school years 5 and 10 in 2014 and 2015, results confirm that when mathematics capability, including both attitudes and test scores, is measured, the gap between boys and girls changes, and it is therefore relevant to consider both concepts. HIGHLIGHTS Italy has one of the highest gender gaps in mathematics in the OECD. Gender gaps are substantial both in children's attitudes and their test scores. Tackling gender stereotypes may improve women's self-confidence in mathematics and the gender gap in scores. This may also help close the gender gap in STEM occupations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超越测试成绩:意大利儿童数学能力的性别差距
本文调查了性别、态度和数学考试成绩之间的关系。该研究认为,衡量儿童的数学能力必须包括一些对这门学科的态度指标。这在分析性别差异时尤为重要,因为对数学的态度因性别而异。为此,本研究首先利用学校固定效应模型分别分析了态度和考试成绩的性别差异。其次,它估计了一个结构方程模型,该模型考虑到数学能力是一个潜在的结构,一些指标(考试成绩和态度)是可以观察到的。利用意大利国家教育系统评估研究所(INVALSI) 2014年和2015年5年级和10年级的数据,结果证实,当测量数学能力(包括态度和考试成绩)时,男孩和女孩之间的差距发生了变化,因此考虑这两个概念是相关的。意大利是经合组织中数学性别差距最大的国家之一。在儿童的态度和考试成绩方面,性别差距都很大。解决性别刻板印象可能会提高女性在数学方面的自信,并缩小分数上的性别差距。这也可能有助于缩小STEM职业中的性别差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Feminist Economics
Feminist Economics Multiple-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: Feminist Economics is a peer-reviewed journal that provides an open forum for dialogue and debate about feminist economic perspectives. By opening new areas of economic inquiry, welcoming diverse voices, and encouraging critical exchanges, the journal enlarges and enriches economic discourse. The goal of Feminist Economics is not just to develop more illuminating theories but to improve the conditions of living for all children, women, and men. Feminist Economics: -Advances feminist inquiry into economic issues affecting the lives of children, women, and men -Examines the relationship between gender and power in the economy and the construction and legitimization of economic knowledge -Extends feminist theoretical, historical, and methodological contributions to economics and the economy -Offers feminist insights into the underlying constructs of the economics discipline and into the historical, political, and cultural context of economic knowledge -Provides a feminist rethinking of theory and policy in diverse fields, including those not directly related to gender -Stimulates discussions among diverse scholars worldwide and from a broad spectrum of intellectual traditions, welcoming cross-disciplinary and cross-country perspectives, especially from countries in the South
期刊最新文献
Dispossession after War: A Feminist Political Economy Perspective Analysis of Seasonal Time Poverty and Aspirations in the Upper East Region of Ghana The Value of Work: The Gendered Outcomes of Organizational Wage Reforms Feminist Ideologies at Work: Culture, Collectivism, and Entrepreneurship among Disadvantaged Women in India Women’s Colleges and Economics Major Choice: Evidence from Wellesley College Applicants
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1