Neonatal Eating Assessment Tool - Mixed Breastfeeding and Bottle-Feeding (NeoEAT - Mixed Feeding): factor analysis and psychometric properties.

Maternal health, neonatology and perinatology Pub Date : 2019-07-31 eCollection Date: 2019-01-01 DOI:10.1186/s40748-019-0107-7
Britt Frisk Pados, Suzanne M Thoyre, Kara Galer
{"title":"Neonatal Eating Assessment Tool - Mixed Breastfeeding and Bottle-Feeding (NeoEAT - Mixed Feeding): factor analysis and psychometric properties.","authors":"Britt Frisk Pados, Suzanne M Thoyre, Kara Galer","doi":"10.1186/s40748-019-0107-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early identification of feeding difficulty in infancy is critical to supporting breastfeeding and ensuring optimal nutrition for brain development. The Neonatal Eating Assessment Tool (NeoEAT) is a parent-report assessment that currently has two versions: NeoEAT - Breastfeeding and NeoEAT - Bottle-feeding for use in breast and bottle-fed infants, respectively. There are currently no valid and reliable parent-report measures to assess feeding through a combination of both breast and bottle delivery. The purpose of this study was to conduct a factor analysis and test the psychometric properties of a new measure, the NeoEAT - Mixed Breastfeeding and Bottle-Feeding (NeoEAT - Mixed Feeding), including internal consistency reliability, test-retest reliability, construct validity and known-groups validity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Parents of infants younger than 7 months who had fed by both bottle and breast in the previous 7 days were invited to participate. Internal consistency reliability was tested using Cronbach's α. Test-retest reliability was tested between scores on the NeoEAT - Mixed Feeding completed 2 weeks apart. Construct validity was tested using correlations between the NeoEAT - Mixed-Feeding, the Infant Gastroesophageal Reflux Questionnaire - Revised (I-GERQ-R), and the Infant Gastrointestinal Symptoms Questionnaire (IGSQ). Known-groups validation was tested between healthy infants and infants with feeding problems.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 608 parents participated. Exploratory factor analysis revealed a 68-item scale with 5 sub-scales. Internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's α = .88) and test-retest reliability (<i>r</i> = 0.91; <i>p</i> < .001) were both acceptable. Construct validity was demonstrated through correlations with the I-GERQ-R (<i>r</i> = 0.57; <i>p</i> < .001) and IGSQ (<i>r</i> = 0.5; <i>p</i> < .001). Infants with feeding problems scored significantly higher on the NeoEAT - Mixed Feeding, indicating more problematic feeding symptoms, than infants without feeding problems (<i>p</i> < .001), supporting known-groups validity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The NeoEAT - Mixed Feeding is a 68-item parent-reported measure of breast- and bottle-feeding behavior for infants less than 7 months old that now has evidence of validity and reliability for use in clinical practice and research. The NeoEAT - Mixed Feeding can be used to identify infants with problematic feeding, guide referral decisions, and evaluate response to interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":74120,"journal":{"name":"Maternal health, neonatology and perinatology","volume":" ","pages":"12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6668191/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Maternal health, neonatology and perinatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40748-019-0107-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Early identification of feeding difficulty in infancy is critical to supporting breastfeeding and ensuring optimal nutrition for brain development. The Neonatal Eating Assessment Tool (NeoEAT) is a parent-report assessment that currently has two versions: NeoEAT - Breastfeeding and NeoEAT - Bottle-feeding for use in breast and bottle-fed infants, respectively. There are currently no valid and reliable parent-report measures to assess feeding through a combination of both breast and bottle delivery. The purpose of this study was to conduct a factor analysis and test the psychometric properties of a new measure, the NeoEAT - Mixed Breastfeeding and Bottle-Feeding (NeoEAT - Mixed Feeding), including internal consistency reliability, test-retest reliability, construct validity and known-groups validity.

Methods: Parents of infants younger than 7 months who had fed by both bottle and breast in the previous 7 days were invited to participate. Internal consistency reliability was tested using Cronbach's α. Test-retest reliability was tested between scores on the NeoEAT - Mixed Feeding completed 2 weeks apart. Construct validity was tested using correlations between the NeoEAT - Mixed-Feeding, the Infant Gastroesophageal Reflux Questionnaire - Revised (I-GERQ-R), and the Infant Gastrointestinal Symptoms Questionnaire (IGSQ). Known-groups validation was tested between healthy infants and infants with feeding problems.

Results: A total of 608 parents participated. Exploratory factor analysis revealed a 68-item scale with 5 sub-scales. Internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's α = .88) and test-retest reliability (r = 0.91; p < .001) were both acceptable. Construct validity was demonstrated through correlations with the I-GERQ-R (r = 0.57; p < .001) and IGSQ (r = 0.5; p < .001). Infants with feeding problems scored significantly higher on the NeoEAT - Mixed Feeding, indicating more problematic feeding symptoms, than infants without feeding problems (p < .001), supporting known-groups validity.

Conclusions: The NeoEAT - Mixed Feeding is a 68-item parent-reported measure of breast- and bottle-feeding behavior for infants less than 7 months old that now has evidence of validity and reliability for use in clinical practice and research. The NeoEAT - Mixed Feeding can be used to identify infants with problematic feeding, guide referral decisions, and evaluate response to interventions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新生儿饮食评估工具-混合母乳喂养和奶瓶喂养(NeoEAT-混合喂养):因素分析和心理测量特性
背景:早期发现婴儿期喂养困难对于支持母乳喂养和确保大脑发育所需的最佳营养至关重要。新生儿进食评估工具(NeoEAT)是一项由家长报告的评估,目前有两个版本:NeoEAT - 母乳喂养和 NeoEAT - 奶瓶喂养分别用于母乳喂养和奶瓶喂养的婴儿。目前还没有有效可靠的家长报告测量方法来评估母乳喂养和奶瓶喂养相结合的喂养方式。本研究旨在对新的测量方法--NeoEAT--母乳和奶瓶混合喂养(NeoEAT--混合喂养)--进行因子分析并测试其心理测量特性,包括内部一致性可靠性、重复测试可靠性、结构效度和已知群体效度:方法:邀请 7 个月以下、在过去 7 天内同时使用奶瓶和母乳喂养的婴儿的父母参加。采用 Cronbach's α 检验内部一致性可靠性。结构效度采用 NeoEAT - 混合喂养、婴儿胃食管反流问卷-修订版(I-GERQ-R)和婴儿胃肠道症状问卷(IGSQ)之间的相关性进行测试。在健康婴儿和有喂养问题的婴儿之间进行了已知组验证测试:结果:共有 608 名家长参与。探索性因子分析显示,该量表共有 68 个项目,包含 5 个子量表。内部一致性信度(Cronbach's α = .88)和测试-再测信度(r = 0.91; p r = 0.57; p r = 0.5; p pNeoEAT - 混合喂养量表由 68 个项目组成,由家长报告 7 个月以下婴儿的母乳喂养和奶瓶喂养行为。NeoEAT - 混合喂养可用于识别有喂养问题的婴儿、指导转诊决定和评估干预措施的反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Acceptability of telemedicine for early surgical site infection diagnosis after cesarean delivery in rural Rwanda: a qualitative study. Charting a new course: advancing maternal and neonatal health through collaborative innovation. Safety of antenatal breastmilk expression from week 34 of pregnancy: a randomized controlled pilot study (The Express-MOM study). Is severe maternal morbidity a risk factor for postpartum hospitalization with mental health or substance use disorder diagnoses? Findings from a retrospective cohort study in Maryland: 2016-2019. High school diploma is associated with longer postpartum leukocyte telomere length in a cohort of primarily Latina women.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1