The analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block vs. local anesthetic infiltration technique in major gynecologic surgery: A randomized controlled trial.

IF 1.5 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Journal of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology Pub Date : 2023-10-01 Epub Date: 2022-08-31 DOI:10.4103/joacp.joacp_78_22
Samina Ismail, Akbar A Mistry, Ali S Siddiqui, Aliya Aziz, Nadeem F Zuberi
{"title":"The analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block vs. local anesthetic infiltration technique in major gynecologic surgery: A randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Samina Ismail, Akbar A Mistry, Ali S Siddiqui, Aliya Aziz, Nadeem F Zuberi","doi":"10.4103/joacp.joacp_78_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block and local anesthetic infiltration (LAI) technique are used as part of the multimodal analgesic regimen after abdominal surgery. Postoperative opioid consumption and analgesic efficacy was compared using TAP and LAI techniques in patients undergoing gynecologic surgery in a randomized, controlled clinical trial.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Total of 135 patients scheduled for major gynecological surgeries were allocated into three groups: group T received bilateral TAP block with bupivacaine 0.25%; group I received LAI with 0.25% bupivacaine with epinephrine 5 μ/mL in the peritoneum and abdominal wall, and group C was control group. Anesthesia and postoperative analgesia were standardized. Outcome measures were cumulative and rescue tramadol consumption, numerical rating score (NRS) for pain and side effects in post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) at 4, 8, 12 hours postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Tramadol consumption, need for rescue analgesia, and NRS for pain between three groups at 4, 8, and 12 hours postoperatively had no statistically significant difference (<i>P</i> < 0.05). In PACU, median tramadol consumption used for rescue analgesia between group T (15 (15-30)) and group C (30 (15-45)) (<i>P</i> = 0.035), and between group T (15 (15-30)) and group I (30 (15-52)) was statistically significant (<i>P</i> = 0.034). In PACU, the percentage of patients having NRS >4 on movement in group C (72%) compared to group T (46.5%) and group I (46.5%) was significant (<i>P</i> = 0.034). No statistically significant difference was observed in the incidence of side effects among study groups (<i>P</i> > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Except for the immediate postoperative period, neither TAP block nor LAI had added benefit to the multimodal analgesia regimen in patients undergoing gynecological surgeries.</p>","PeriodicalId":14946,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10805223/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/joacp.joacp_78_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/8/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aim: Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block and local anesthetic infiltration (LAI) technique are used as part of the multimodal analgesic regimen after abdominal surgery. Postoperative opioid consumption and analgesic efficacy was compared using TAP and LAI techniques in patients undergoing gynecologic surgery in a randomized, controlled clinical trial.

Material and methods: Total of 135 patients scheduled for major gynecological surgeries were allocated into three groups: group T received bilateral TAP block with bupivacaine 0.25%; group I received LAI with 0.25% bupivacaine with epinephrine 5 μ/mL in the peritoneum and abdominal wall, and group C was control group. Anesthesia and postoperative analgesia were standardized. Outcome measures were cumulative and rescue tramadol consumption, numerical rating score (NRS) for pain and side effects in post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) at 4, 8, 12 hours postoperatively.

Results: Tramadol consumption, need for rescue analgesia, and NRS for pain between three groups at 4, 8, and 12 hours postoperatively had no statistically significant difference (P < 0.05). In PACU, median tramadol consumption used for rescue analgesia between group T (15 (15-30)) and group C (30 (15-45)) (P = 0.035), and between group T (15 (15-30)) and group I (30 (15-52)) was statistically significant (P = 0.034). In PACU, the percentage of patients having NRS >4 on movement in group C (72%) compared to group T (46.5%) and group I (46.5%) was significant (P = 0.034). No statistically significant difference was observed in the incidence of side effects among study groups (P > 0.05).

Conclusion: Except for the immediate postoperative period, neither TAP block nor LAI had added benefit to the multimodal analgesia regimen in patients undergoing gynecological surgeries.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超声引导下经腹平面阻滞与局麻浸润技术在妇科大手术中的镇痛效果比较
背景和目的:腹横肌平面(TAP)阻滞和局麻药浸润(LAI)技术是腹部手术后多模式镇痛方案的一部分。在一项随机对照临床试验中,比较了妇科手术患者术后使用 TAP 和 LAI 技术的阿片类药物消耗量和镇痛效果:将135名妇科大手术患者分为三组:T组接受0.25%布比卡因的双侧TAP阻滞;I组接受0.25%布比卡因加5 μ/mL肾上腺素的腹膜和腹壁LAI;C组为对照组。麻醉和术后镇痛均标准化。结果指标为术后4、8、12小时在麻醉后护理病房(PACU)的累积和抢救曲马多消耗量、疼痛和副作用的数字评分(NRS):结果:三组患者在术后 4、8 和 12 小时的曲马多用量、镇痛抢救需求和疼痛 NRS 无统计学差异(P < 0.05)。在 PACU,T 组(15 (15-30))和 C 组(30 (15-45))之间用于抢救性镇痛的曲马多用量中位数(P = 0.035),以及 T 组(15 (15-30))和 I 组(30 (15-52))之间用于抢救性镇痛的曲马多用量中位数有统计学意义(P = 0.034)。在 PACU,与 T 组(46.5%)和 I 组(46.5%)相比,C 组(72%)患者运动时 NRS >4 的比例有显著性差异(P = 0.034)。各研究组的副作用发生率无统计学差异(P > 0.05):结论:除术后初期外,TAP阻滞和LAI对妇科手术患者的多模式镇痛方案均无额外益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
129
期刊介绍: The JOACP publishes original peer-reviewed research and clinical work in all branches of anaesthesiology, pain, critical care and perioperative medicine including the application to basic sciences. In addition, the journal publishes review articles, special articles, brief communications/reports, case reports, and reports of new equipment, letters to editor, book reviews and obituaries. It is international in scope and comprehensive in coverage.
期刊最新文献
"Burnout syndrome" in anesthesiologists and remedial measures- A narrative review. Stellate ganglion block beyond chronic pain: A literature review on its application in painful and non-painful conditions. Ropivacaine pharmacokinetics in the arterial and venous pools after ultrasound-guided continuous thoracic paravertebral nerve block. Role of an epidural in laparoscopic surgeries. Managing a leaky epidural catheter: Thinking out of the box.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1