Pedological development of South El-Amiria soils using field morphology rating system.

IF 1.9 Q3 SOIL SCIENCE EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE Pub Date : 2021-12-01 DOI:10.21608/ejss.2022.116491.1486
A. Zayed, H. El-Tapey, Abd Monem Al-Toukhy
{"title":"Pedological development of South El-Amiria soils using field morphology rating system.","authors":"A. Zayed, H. El-Tapey, Abd Monem Al-Toukhy","doi":"10.21608/ejss.2022.116491.1486","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"he current study was used the field morphological rating scale for evaluating pedological development through determining the Relative Horizons Distinctness (RHD) and the Relative Profile Development (RPD) of soil . Some chemical and physical properties were used to evaluate the pedogenic factors as a result of being affected by process and factors of soil formation due to the distinct effect of climatologically environment. The RHD ratings were made by a comparison of adjacent horizons. Average of RHD ratings on the level of physiographic unit show that soils of windblown sand older than soils of lacustrine plains. The RPD ratings were made by a comparison of the C horizon to the horizons above it in the profile. The average RPD ratings of lacustrine plains under Aridisols order were less than windblown sand, which most area belong to Entisols order. So, studies of pedological development need more attempts to include different features of the international soil development.","PeriodicalId":44612,"journal":{"name":"EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/ejss.2022.116491.1486","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

he current study was used the field morphological rating scale for evaluating pedological development through determining the Relative Horizons Distinctness (RHD) and the Relative Profile Development (RPD) of soil . Some chemical and physical properties were used to evaluate the pedogenic factors as a result of being affected by process and factors of soil formation due to the distinct effect of climatologically environment. The RHD ratings were made by a comparison of adjacent horizons. Average of RHD ratings on the level of physiographic unit show that soils of windblown sand older than soils of lacustrine plains. The RPD ratings were made by a comparison of the C horizon to the horizons above it in the profile. The average RPD ratings of lacustrine plains under Aridisols order were less than windblown sand, which most area belong to Entisols order. So, studies of pedological development need more attempts to include different features of the international soil development.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用田间形态评级系统对南艾米利亚土壤进行的土壤学发育。
本研究采用田间形态评定量表,通过测定土壤的相对水平差异(RHD)和相对剖面发育(RPD)来评价土壤发育。由于气候环境的不同影响,土壤形成过程和因素会对成土因素产生影响,因此利用一些化学和物理性质来评价成土因素。RHD评级是通过对相邻层位的比较得出的。自然地理单元水平上RHD评级的平均值表明,风积沙的土壤比湖积平原的土壤更古老。RPD评级是通过将C水平与剖面中高于C水平的水平进行比较而得出的。Aridisols目下湖相平原的平均RPD等级低于风积沙,风积沙大部分地区属于Entisols目。因此,对土壤发育的研究需要更多的尝试,以包含国际土壤发育的不同特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
40.00%
发文量
28
期刊最新文献
Does West Menya Consider a Promising Area to Build a New Agricultural Society? GRAPHENE OXIDE SYNTHESIS AND CHARACTERIZATIONS AS A CARBONACEOUS NANOPARTICLE BY USING MODIFIED HUMMERS’ METHOD Evaluating the Response of Peanuts Plant Irrigated with Agricultural Drainage Water to Organic Fertilization and Foliar Application of Magnesium and Selenium, Along with Soil Property Assessment Assessment of Potato Vegetation and Yield under Smart Irrigation Contaminate Remediation with Biochar and Nanobiochar Focusing on Food Waste Biochar: A Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1