On Definitions of "Mathematician"

Pub Date : 2023-02-15 DOI:10.5642/jhummath.zruz1463
R. Buckmire, C. Eaton, Joseph E. Hibdon, Jr., Katherine M. Kinnaird, Drew Lewis, Jessica M. Libertini, Omayra Ortega, Rachel Roca, Andr'es R. Vindas-Mel'endez
{"title":"On Definitions of \"Mathematician\"","authors":"R. Buckmire, C. Eaton, Joseph E. Hibdon, Jr., Katherine M. Kinnaird, Drew Lewis, Jessica M. Libertini, Omayra Ortega, Rachel Roca, Andr'es R. Vindas-Mel'endez","doi":"10.5642/jhummath.zruz1463","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The definition of who is or what makes a ``mathematician\"is an important and urgent issue to be addressed in the mathematics community. Too often, a narrower definition of who is considered a mathematician (and what is considered mathematics) is used to exclude people from the discipline -- both explicitly and implicitly. However, using a narrow definition of a mathematician allows us to examine and challenge systemic barriers that exist in certain spaces of the community. This paper explores and illuminates tensions between narrow and broad definitions and how they can be used to promote both inclusion and exclusion simultaneously. In this article, we present a framework of definitions based on identity, function, and qualification and exploring several different meanings of ``mathematician\". By interrogating various definitions, we highlight their risks and opportunities, with an emphasis on implications for broadening and/or narrowing participation of underrepresented groups.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5642/jhummath.zruz1463","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The definition of who is or what makes a ``mathematician"is an important and urgent issue to be addressed in the mathematics community. Too often, a narrower definition of who is considered a mathematician (and what is considered mathematics) is used to exclude people from the discipline -- both explicitly and implicitly. However, using a narrow definition of a mathematician allows us to examine and challenge systemic barriers that exist in certain spaces of the community. This paper explores and illuminates tensions between narrow and broad definitions and how they can be used to promote both inclusion and exclusion simultaneously. In this article, we present a framework of definitions based on identity, function, and qualification and exploring several different meanings of ``mathematician". By interrogating various definitions, we highlight their risks and opportunities, with an emphasis on implications for broadening and/or narrowing participation of underrepresented groups.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
论“数学家”的定义
“数学家”的定义是数学界需要解决的一个重要而紧迫的问题。通常,对谁被认为是数学家(以及什么被认为是数学)的定义更窄被用来将人们排除在学科之外——无论是明确的还是隐含的。然而,使用数学家的狭义定义可以让我们审视和挑战社区某些空间中存在的系统性障碍。本文探讨并阐明了狭义定义和广义定义之间的紧张关系,以及如何利用狭义定义同时促进包容和排斥。在这篇文章中,我们提出了一个基于身份、函数和资格的定义框架,并探讨了“数学家”的几个不同含义。通过询问各种定义,我们强调了它们的风险和机遇,重点是对扩大和/或缩小代表性不足群体的参与的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1