A Comparative Analysis of the Biden Administration’s Indo-Pacific Strategy vs. the Trump Administration’s

IF 1.1 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE East Asian Policy Pub Date : 2022-10-01 DOI:10.1142/s1793930522000289
Paul Haenle
{"title":"A Comparative Analysis of the Biden Administration’s Indo-Pacific Strategy vs. the Trump Administration’s","authors":"Paul Haenle","doi":"10.1142/s1793930522000289","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years the United States has placed the Indo-Pacific at the centre of its foreign policy and national security strategy. While the Trump administration introduced the United States’ first strategy for the Indo-Pacific, the administration fell short of implementing an effective policy that catered to the regional realities on the ground. The Biden administration has improved upon its predecessor’s shortcomings in the diplomatic domain but has yet to implement a comprehensive economic strategy for the region. This article compares the distinctive diplomatic, economic and security characteristics of the Trump and the Biden administrations’ Indo-Pacific strategies and argues that the latter administration crafted a more effective, albeit incomplete, strategy for advancing US interests.","PeriodicalId":41995,"journal":{"name":"East Asian Policy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"East Asian Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/s1793930522000289","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent years the United States has placed the Indo-Pacific at the centre of its foreign policy and national security strategy. While the Trump administration introduced the United States’ first strategy for the Indo-Pacific, the administration fell short of implementing an effective policy that catered to the regional realities on the ground. The Biden administration has improved upon its predecessor’s shortcomings in the diplomatic domain but has yet to implement a comprehensive economic strategy for the region. This article compares the distinctive diplomatic, economic and security characteristics of the Trump and the Biden administrations’ Indo-Pacific strategies and argues that the latter administration crafted a more effective, albeit incomplete, strategy for advancing US interests.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
拜登政府与特朗普政府印太战略的比较分析
近年来,美国将印太地区置于其外交政策和国家安全战略的中心位置。特朗普政府虽然提出了美国的第一个“印度太平洋战略”,但未能实施符合地区实际的有效政策。拜登政府虽然在外交上弥补了前任政府的不足,但还没有实施全面的地区经济战略。本文比较了特朗普政府和拜登政府印太战略的外交、经济和安全特点,并认为拜登政府为推进美国利益制定了一个更有效的战略,尽管不完整。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
East Asian Policy
East Asian Policy POLITICAL SCIENCE-
自引率
11.10%
发文量
8
期刊最新文献
Prevalence and Correlates of VA-Purchased Community Care Use Among Post-9/11-Era Veterans With Traumatic Brain Injury. The Marcos Administration’s Foreign Policy towards the Great Powers: Seeking the Elusive Balance in Dealing a Changing Indo-Pacific Region Initiative Diplomacy: China’s New Rules for Global Governance, Security and Development Japanese Peacebuilding Diplomacy in Southeast Asia and Beyond in the New World Order The Rise, Fall and (Potential) Rise Again of East Asian Middle Powers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1