Experimental Studies of a Pulse Pressurisation Technique for Measuring Building Airtightness

Q1 Engineering Future Cities and Environment Pub Date : 2019-06-26 DOI:10.5334/FCE.66
Xiaofeng Zheng, E. Cooper, Y. Zu, M. Gillott, D. Tetlow, S. Riffat, C. Wood
{"title":"Experimental Studies of a Pulse Pressurisation Technique for Measuring Building Airtightness","authors":"Xiaofeng Zheng, E. Cooper, Y. Zu, M. Gillott, D. Tetlow, S. Riffat, C. Wood","doi":"10.5334/FCE.66","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A pulse pressurisation technique is developed and utilised for determining building leakage at low pressure, based on a “quasi-steady pulse” concept. The underlying principle of the technique is to subject the building envelope to a known volume change in a short period of time (typically 1.5 s). The resulting pressure pulse is recorded, from which the leakage characteristic at low pressure is determined. The technique minimizes the effects of wind and buoyancy forces and has proven to be repeatable. It can use a compact and portable test rig and does not need to penetrate the building envelope. Therefore, it can obtain the leakage of a building very quickly and efficiently. Throughout the various stages of research and development of the pulse technique, experimental investigations have been carried out under different configurations and scenarios in order to validate the changes that have been made for the purpose of system development and optimisation. This paper provides an overview of experimental investigations in the validation process by covering comparison between blower door and pulse unit, comparison between piston-based pulse unit and nozzle-based pulse unit, testing with multiple pulse units in a large building, testing with a known opening, and testing in different building types with a range of volumes and airtightness levels. It enables us to understand the strengths and the limits of the pulse technique, from the experimental and practical perspectives. A good repeatability level (within ±5%) has been maintained throughout the various developmental stages and the average value of Q50/Q4 reported herein was in close agreement (","PeriodicalId":36755,"journal":{"name":"Future Cities and Environment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Future Cities and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/FCE.66","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

A pulse pressurisation technique is developed and utilised for determining building leakage at low pressure, based on a “quasi-steady pulse” concept. The underlying principle of the technique is to subject the building envelope to a known volume change in a short period of time (typically 1.5 s). The resulting pressure pulse is recorded, from which the leakage characteristic at low pressure is determined. The technique minimizes the effects of wind and buoyancy forces and has proven to be repeatable. It can use a compact and portable test rig and does not need to penetrate the building envelope. Therefore, it can obtain the leakage of a building very quickly and efficiently. Throughout the various stages of research and development of the pulse technique, experimental investigations have been carried out under different configurations and scenarios in order to validate the changes that have been made for the purpose of system development and optimisation. This paper provides an overview of experimental investigations in the validation process by covering comparison between blower door and pulse unit, comparison between piston-based pulse unit and nozzle-based pulse unit, testing with multiple pulse units in a large building, testing with a known opening, and testing in different building types with a range of volumes and airtightness levels. It enables us to understand the strengths and the limits of the pulse technique, from the experimental and practical perspectives. A good repeatability level (within ±5%) has been maintained throughout the various developmental stages and the average value of Q50/Q4 reported herein was in close agreement (
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脉冲增压技术测量建筑物气密性的实验研究
基于“准稳定脉冲”概念,开发了一种脉冲加压技术,并将其用于确定低压下的建筑物泄漏。该技术的基本原理是使建筑围护结构在短时间内(通常为1.5 s)发生已知的体积变化。记录得到的压力脉冲,由此确定低压下的泄漏特性。该技术最大限度地减少了风力和浮力的影响,并已被证明是可重复的。它可以使用紧凑便携的测试设备,不需要穿透建筑外壳。因此,它可以非常快速和有效地获得建筑物的渗漏。在脉冲技术研究和开发的各个阶段,都在不同的配置和场景下进行了实验研究,以验证为系统开发和优化所做的更改。本文概述了验证过程中的实验研究,包括鼓风机门和脉冲单元之间的比较、基于活塞的脉冲单元和基于喷嘴的脉冲单元的比较、在大型建筑中使用多个脉冲单元进行测试、使用已知开口进行测试,以及在具有一定体积和气密性水平的不同建筑类型中进行测试。它使我们能够从实验和实践的角度了解脉冲技术的优势和局限性。在各个发育阶段都保持了良好的重复性水平(±5%以内),本文报告的Q50/Q4的平均值非常一致(
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Future Cities and Environment
Future Cities and Environment Engineering-Architecture
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊最新文献
A Generative Design Approach to Improving the Environmental Performance of Educational Buildings in Hot Arid Climates. (Assiut National University as a Case Study) Using Green Roofs for Social Housing to Improve Energy Consumption in New Cities. (An Applied Study of Social Housing in Egypt’s New Cairo City) Zero Touch in Fog, IoT, and MANET for Enhanced Smart City Applications: A Survey Comparison of Energy Production Between Fixed-Mount and Tracking Systems of Solar PV Systems in Jakarta, Indonesia Designing Ecological Floating Wetlands to Optimize Ecosystem Services for Urban Resilience in Tropical Climates: A Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1