Developing the “lines”: Politically Significant Landscapes in Great Expectations and A Tale of Two Cities

IF 0.7 1区 文学 0 LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES DICKENS QUARTERLY Pub Date : 2023-05-23 DOI:10.1353/dqt.2023.0021
Nanako Konoshima
{"title":"Developing the “lines”: Politically Significant Landscapes in Great Expectations and A Tale of Two Cities","authors":"Nanako Konoshima","doi":"10.1353/dqt.2023.0021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Philip Collins once noted that A Tale of Two Cities and Great Expectations, two “remarkably different” novels, are “consecutive” and “close together” (“A Tale” 337). In fact, the consecutiveness of the two works deserves closer and fuller examination than Collins suggests, and the present essay teases out thematic and textual links between them, related to the overall idea of the two novels, that have gone unexplored. These links revolve around Dickens’s creation of politically significant landscape motifs, and I argue that the description of the marshes in Great Expectations is a successful development of the earlier novel’s revolutionary landscapes, both in aesthetic and emblematic terms. The marked linearity of the landscapes in the two works, pictorially presented with bruised figures in the foreground, visually represents egalitarian ideals. Yet, at the same time, they both juxtapose the paradoxical, contradictory symbols of the beacon and the gibbet, exposing Dickens’s contentious class-consciousness. The evocation of the marshes in the opening chapters of Great Expectations has always been praised and has prompted much critical interest.1 Notably, Dickens’s much abridged public reading text of the novel (never performed) retains almost all the original paragraphs describing the marshes in chapter 1, suggesting that they perform an essential role in realizing the story’s main idea. Previous studies have examined the function of the marshy landscapes in Pip’s narrative and revealed the ways in which they embody the experience of the “isolated” and “alienated” Dickensian hero (Miller 250–51).2 Concurrently, however, these landscapes evoke a wider concept","PeriodicalId":41747,"journal":{"name":"DICKENS QUARTERLY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DICKENS QUARTERLY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/dqt.2023.0021","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Philip Collins once noted that A Tale of Two Cities and Great Expectations, two “remarkably different” novels, are “consecutive” and “close together” (“A Tale” 337). In fact, the consecutiveness of the two works deserves closer and fuller examination than Collins suggests, and the present essay teases out thematic and textual links between them, related to the overall idea of the two novels, that have gone unexplored. These links revolve around Dickens’s creation of politically significant landscape motifs, and I argue that the description of the marshes in Great Expectations is a successful development of the earlier novel’s revolutionary landscapes, both in aesthetic and emblematic terms. The marked linearity of the landscapes in the two works, pictorially presented with bruised figures in the foreground, visually represents egalitarian ideals. Yet, at the same time, they both juxtapose the paradoxical, contradictory symbols of the beacon and the gibbet, exposing Dickens’s contentious class-consciousness. The evocation of the marshes in the opening chapters of Great Expectations has always been praised and has prompted much critical interest.1 Notably, Dickens’s much abridged public reading text of the novel (never performed) retains almost all the original paragraphs describing the marshes in chapter 1, suggesting that they perform an essential role in realizing the story’s main idea. Previous studies have examined the function of the marshy landscapes in Pip’s narrative and revealed the ways in which they embody the experience of the “isolated” and “alienated” Dickensian hero (Miller 250–51).2 Concurrently, however, these landscapes evoke a wider concept
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
发展“路线”:《远大前程》和《双城记》中的政治意义景观
菲利普·柯林斯(Philip Collins)曾指出,《双城记》和《远大前程》这两部“截然不同”的小说是“连续的”和“紧密相连的”(《故事集》337)。事实上,这两部作品的连贯性值得比柯林斯所说的更仔细、更全面的研究,本文梳理了它们之间的主题和文本联系,这些联系与这两部小说的整体思想有关,但尚未被探索。这些联系围绕着狄更斯对具有政治意义的景观主题的创作,我认为《远大前程》中对沼泽的描述是对早期小说革命性景观的成功发展,无论是在美学上还是在象征意义上。这两幅作品中明显的线性景观,前景中有伤痕累累的人物,在视觉上代表了平等主义的理想。然而,与此同时,他们都将灯塔和绞刑架的矛盾符号并置,暴露了狄更斯有争议的阶级意识。《远大前程》开头几章对沼泽地的回忆一直受到赞扬,并引起了许多评论界的兴趣。1值得注意的是,狄更斯对小说的公开阅读文本进行了大量删节(从未表演过),几乎保留了第一章中描述沼泽地的所有原始段落,这表明它们在实现故事主旨方面发挥着重要作用。先前的研究已经考察了沼泽景观在皮普叙事中的作用,并揭示了它们体现“孤立”和“异化”狄更斯英雄(Miller 250-51)体验的方式。2然而,与此同时,这些景观唤起了一个更广泛的概念
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
DICKENS QUARTERLY
DICKENS QUARTERLY LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
16.70%
发文量
33
期刊最新文献
Dickens's Mudfog Charles Dickens and Georgina Hogarth: A Curious and Enduring Relationship by Christine Skelton (review) Writing to Control the Narrative: Charles Dickens, PTSD, and the Staplehurst Rail Crash The Year that Shaped the Victorian Age: Lives, Loves and Letters of 1845 by Michael Wheeler (review) The Dickens Checklist
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1