Introduction: Contested Fundamentals of the Law of International Organizations: Repositioning Legal Theory

Lorenzo Gasbarri
{"title":"Introduction: Contested Fundamentals of the Law of International Organizations: Repositioning Legal Theory","authors":"Lorenzo Gasbarri","doi":"10.1163/15723747-20010001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2020, Jan Klabbers and Guy Fiti Sinclair opened a Symposium of the European Journal of International Law by claiming that “international organizations law is one of those fields of international law where theorization by lawyers has been kept to a minimum”.1 Judging by the reactions of legal academics, especially early career researchers, their call was not left unanswered. In just two years, international organizations have been the object of several interdisciplinary studies adopting different perspectives and tools to discuss the uses of legal expertise. Socio-legal, historical, and ethnographic studies are redefining the ways in which to look at international organizations.2 International organizations appear to be the ideal arena in which to perform archival research, interviews, textual analysis, or have a direct working experience to study the ‘law in action’ under intriguing and enriching perspectives. By contrast, it appears that doctrinal research on the law of international organizations is not keeping the pace with this renewed interest and is getting marginalized by both academia and practitioners. For the former, it is","PeriodicalId":42966,"journal":{"name":"International Organizations Law Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Organizations Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15723747-20010001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In 2020, Jan Klabbers and Guy Fiti Sinclair opened a Symposium of the European Journal of International Law by claiming that “international organizations law is one of those fields of international law where theorization by lawyers has been kept to a minimum”.1 Judging by the reactions of legal academics, especially early career researchers, their call was not left unanswered. In just two years, international organizations have been the object of several interdisciplinary studies adopting different perspectives and tools to discuss the uses of legal expertise. Socio-legal, historical, and ethnographic studies are redefining the ways in which to look at international organizations.2 International organizations appear to be the ideal arena in which to perform archival research, interviews, textual analysis, or have a direct working experience to study the ‘law in action’ under intriguing and enriching perspectives. By contrast, it appears that doctrinal research on the law of international organizations is not keeping the pace with this renewed interest and is getting marginalized by both academia and practitioners. For the former, it is
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
导论:国际组织法的争议基础:法律理论的重新定位
2020年,Jan Klabbers和Guy Fiti Sinclair在《欧洲国际法杂志》(European Journal of International Law)的研讨会上提出,“国际组织法是国际法中律师理论化被保持在最低限度的领域之一”从法律学者的反应来看,尤其是早期职业研究人员,他们的呼吁并没有被置之不理。在短短两年内,国际组织已成为若干跨学科研究的对象,采用不同的观点和工具来讨论法律专门知识的使用。社会法律、历史和民族志研究正在重新定义看待国际组织的方式国际组织似乎是进行档案研究、访谈、文本分析或在有趣和丰富的视角下研究“行动中的法律”的直接工作经验的理想场所。相比之下,关于国际组织法的理论研究似乎没有跟上这种新的兴趣的步伐,并被学术界和实践者边缘化。对于前者来说,确实如此
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
14.30%
发文量
10
期刊介绍: After the Second World War in particular, the law of international organizations developed as a discipline within public international law. Separate, but not separable. The International Organizations Law Review purports to function as a discussion forum for academics and practitioners active in the field of the law of international organizations. It is based on two pillars; one is based in the world of scholarship, the other in the world of practice. In the first dimension, the Journal focuses on general developments in international institutional law.
期刊最新文献
Constructing African Union Law and Rethinking Supranationalism in African Integration: What Lessons from the European Union? The Freedom of Association as Seen by the International Administrative Tribunals Positive Duties of the Security Council Under the UN Charter and International Law Forty Years of Cooperation in South Asia: A Legal Appraisal of the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (saarc) The Nordic Investment Bank: The Evolution of an International Institution
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1