Transcultural Networks and Connectivities: The Circulation of Mathematical Ideas between India and England in the Nineteenth Century

Q3 Social Sciences Contemporary Education Dialogue Pub Date : 2021-12-14 DOI:10.1177/09731849211064500
Dhruv Raina
{"title":"Transcultural Networks and Connectivities: The Circulation of Mathematical Ideas between India and England in the Nineteenth Century","authors":"Dhruv Raina","doi":"10.1177/09731849211064500","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The nineteenth century has been characterised as a period in which mathematics proper acquired a disciplinary and institutional autonomy. This article explores the intertwining of three intersecting worlds of the history of mathematics inasmuch as it engages with historicising the pursuit of novel mathematics, the history of disciplines and, more specifically, that of the British Indological writings on Indian mathematics, and finally, the history of mathematics education in nineteenth century India. But, more importantly, the article is concerned with a class of science and mathematics teaching problems that are taken up by researchers—in other words, science and mathematics teaching problems that lead to scientific and mathematical research. The article argues that over a period of 50 years, a network of scholars crystallised around a discussion on mathematics proper, the history of mathematics and education. This discussion spanned not just nineteenth-century England but India as well, involving scholars from both worlds. This network included Scottish mathematicians, East India Company officials and administrators who went on to constitute the first generation of British Indologists, a group of mathematicians in England referred to as the Analytics, and traditional Indian scholars and mathematics teachers. The focus will be on the concerns and genealogies of investigation that forged this network and sustained it for over half a century.","PeriodicalId":37486,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Education Dialogue","volume":"19 1","pages":"84 - 106"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Education Dialogue","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09731849211064500","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The nineteenth century has been characterised as a period in which mathematics proper acquired a disciplinary and institutional autonomy. This article explores the intertwining of three intersecting worlds of the history of mathematics inasmuch as it engages with historicising the pursuit of novel mathematics, the history of disciplines and, more specifically, that of the British Indological writings on Indian mathematics, and finally, the history of mathematics education in nineteenth century India. But, more importantly, the article is concerned with a class of science and mathematics teaching problems that are taken up by researchers—in other words, science and mathematics teaching problems that lead to scientific and mathematical research. The article argues that over a period of 50 years, a network of scholars crystallised around a discussion on mathematics proper, the history of mathematics and education. This discussion spanned not just nineteenth-century England but India as well, involving scholars from both worlds. This network included Scottish mathematicians, East India Company officials and administrators who went on to constitute the first generation of British Indologists, a group of mathematicians in England referred to as the Analytics, and traditional Indian scholars and mathematics teachers. The focus will be on the concerns and genealogies of investigation that forged this network and sustained it for over half a century.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
跨文化网络和连通性:19世纪印度和英国之间数学思想的流通
十九世纪的特点是数学本身获得了学科和制度的自主权。本文探讨了数学史上三个相互交叉的世界的交织,因为它涉及到对新数学的历史追求,学科史,更具体地说,英国印支关于印度数学的著作,以及最后19世纪印度数学教育史。但是,更重要的是,这篇文章关注的是研究人员所关注的一类科学和数学教学问题——换句话说,导致科学和数学研究的科学和数学教育问题。文章认为,在50年的时间里,一个学者网络围绕着一场关于数学本体、数学史和教育的讨论而具体化。这场讨论不仅涉及19世纪的英国,也涉及印度,涉及来自两个世界的学者。这个网络包括苏格兰数学家、东印度公司的官员和管理人员,他们后来组成了第一代英国印度学家,英国的一群数学家被称为“分析”,以及传统的印度学者和数学教师。重点将放在调查的关注点和系谱上,这些问题和系谱伪造了这个网络,并将其维持了半个多世纪。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Contemporary Education Dialogue
Contemporary Education Dialogue Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
期刊介绍: Contemporary Education Dialogue serves as an independent open forum for researchers and practitioners to sustain a critical engagement with issues in education by engendering a reflective space that nurtures the discipline and promotes inter-disciplinary perspectives. The peer-reviewed journal allows for a refinement of theoretical and practical basis for improving the quality of education, furthering the opportunity to directly create reflective classroom practices. It invites contributions by academicians, policy-makers and practitioners on various topics related to education, particularly elementary education. Discussions and responses to published articles are also welcome.
期刊最新文献
Understanding Graphical Literacy Using School Students’ Comprehension Strategies Social Science Teacher? Anyone 
Can Become’: Examining 
Professional Subject Identity of Social Science Teachers in India Feminist Pedagogy in Women’s Studies Classrooms: Some Critical Reflections Language as a Tool for Inclusive and Equitable School Education: A Critical Review of NEP 2020 New Education Policy and Higher Education Reforms in India
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1