{"title":"Living as we Dream: Automatism and Automation from Surrealism to Stiegler","authors":"Madeleine R. Chalmers","doi":"10.3366/nfs.2020.0296","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In his 2011 French Studies article ‘Leroi-Gourhan and the Limits of the Human’, Chris Johnson traced André Leroi-Gourhan's ethnography of the imbrication of the biological, cultural, and technological in Le Geste et la parole (1964). Johnson placed special emphasis on how Leroi-Gourhan's narrative culminates in a speculative vision of a homo post-sapiens: a limit-experience in which our species evolves beyond the human as we understand it in an increasingly automated world. This article takes up the conceptual genealogy surrounding Leroi-Gourhan to focus on the interaction between his work and that of his unruly predecessor André Breton, and heir, Bernard Stiegler. Taking as its starting point the linguistic contagion of automatism and automation, it will argue that Stiegler's contemporary reflections on our ‘automatic society’ are rooted in a Bretonian surrealist preoccupation with the automatic – not as a category of alienation, but as a wellspring of creativity, dreams, and subjectivity unfurling in language. Understanding how contemporary French technocritical thought has filtered down from avant-garde artistic movements through anthropology in an unruly technocritical genealogy offers an opportunity to reclaim the notion of the automatic, and to reconfigure our expectations and plans for our technological future.","PeriodicalId":19182,"journal":{"name":"Nottingham French Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nottingham French Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/nfs.2020.0296","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, ROMANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In his 2011 French Studies article ‘Leroi-Gourhan and the Limits of the Human’, Chris Johnson traced André Leroi-Gourhan's ethnography of the imbrication of the biological, cultural, and technological in Le Geste et la parole (1964). Johnson placed special emphasis on how Leroi-Gourhan's narrative culminates in a speculative vision of a homo post-sapiens: a limit-experience in which our species evolves beyond the human as we understand it in an increasingly automated world. This article takes up the conceptual genealogy surrounding Leroi-Gourhan to focus on the interaction between his work and that of his unruly predecessor André Breton, and heir, Bernard Stiegler. Taking as its starting point the linguistic contagion of automatism and automation, it will argue that Stiegler's contemporary reflections on our ‘automatic society’ are rooted in a Bretonian surrealist preoccupation with the automatic – not as a category of alienation, but as a wellspring of creativity, dreams, and subjectivity unfurling in language. Understanding how contemporary French technocritical thought has filtered down from avant-garde artistic movements through anthropology in an unruly technocritical genealogy offers an opportunity to reclaim the notion of the automatic, and to reconfigure our expectations and plans for our technological future.
克里斯·约翰逊在其2011年的法国研究文章《勒罗伊·古尔汉与人类的极限》中追溯了安德烈·勒罗伊·古尔汉在《Le Geste et la paral》(1964)中对生物、文化和技术的重叠的民族志。Johnson特别强调了Leroi Gourhan的叙事是如何在后智人的思辨视野中达到高潮的:这是一种极限体验,在这种体验中,我们的物种在一个日益自动化的世界中超越了我们所理解的人类。本文采用了围绕勒罗伊·古尔汉的概念谱系,重点关注他的作品与他不守规矩的前任安德烈·布雷顿和继承人伯纳德·斯蒂格勒的作品之间的互动。以自动化和自动化的语言传染为出发点,它认为斯蒂格勒对我们“自动化社会”的当代反思植根于布雷顿超现实主义对自动化的关注 – 不是异化的范畴,而是创造力、梦想和主体性在语言中的源泉。在一个不守规矩的技术批判谱系中,通过人类学了解当代法国技术批判思想是如何从先锋艺术运动中渗透出来的,这为我们重新树立自动化的概念,重新配置我们对技术未来的期望和计划提供了机会。
期刊介绍:
Nottingham French Studies is an externally-refereed academic journal which, from Volume 43, 2004, appears three times annually, with at least one special and one general issue each year. Its Editorial Board is drawn from members of the Department of French and Francophone Studies of the University of Nottingham, with the support of an International Advisory Board.