Supporting Developers in Addressing Human-Centric Issues in Mobile Apps

IF 5.6 1区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering Pub Date : 2022-10-20 DOI:10.1109/TSE.2022.3212329
Hourieh Khalajzadeh;Mojtaba Shahin;Humphrey O. Obie;Pragya Agrawal;John Grundy
{"title":"Supporting Developers in Addressing Human-Centric Issues in Mobile Apps","authors":"Hourieh Khalajzadeh;Mojtaba Shahin;Humphrey O. Obie;Pragya Agrawal;John Grundy","doi":"10.1109/TSE.2022.3212329","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Failure to consider the characteristics, limitations, and abilities of diverse end-users during mobile app development may lead to problems for end-users, such as accessibility and usability issues. We refer to this class of problems as \n<italic>human-centric issues</i>\n. Despite their importance, there is a limited understanding of the types of human-centric issues that are encountered by end-users and taken into account by the developers of mobile apps. In this paper, we examine what human-centric issues end-users report through Google App Store reviews, what human-centric issues are a topic of discussion for developers on GitHub, and whether end-users and developers discuss the same human-centric issues. We then investigate whether an automated tool might help detect such human-centric issues and whether developers would find such a tool useful. To do this, we conducted an empirical study by extracting and manually analysing a random sample of 1,200 app reviews and 1,200 issue comments from 12 diverse projects that exist on both Google App Store and GitHub. Our analysis led to a taxonomy of human-centric issues that characterises human-centric issues into three-high level categories: App Usage, Inclusiveness, and User Reaction. We then developed machine learning and deep learning models that are promising in automatically identifying and classifying human-centric issues from app reviews and developer discussions. A survey of mobile app developers shows that the automated detection of human-centric issues has practical applications. Guided by our findings, we highlight some implications and possible future work to further understand and better incorporate addressing human-centric issues into mobile app development.","PeriodicalId":13324,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering","volume":"49 4","pages":"2149-2168"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9925643/","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Failure to consider the characteristics, limitations, and abilities of diverse end-users during mobile app development may lead to problems for end-users, such as accessibility and usability issues. We refer to this class of problems as human-centric issues . Despite their importance, there is a limited understanding of the types of human-centric issues that are encountered by end-users and taken into account by the developers of mobile apps. In this paper, we examine what human-centric issues end-users report through Google App Store reviews, what human-centric issues are a topic of discussion for developers on GitHub, and whether end-users and developers discuss the same human-centric issues. We then investigate whether an automated tool might help detect such human-centric issues and whether developers would find such a tool useful. To do this, we conducted an empirical study by extracting and manually analysing a random sample of 1,200 app reviews and 1,200 issue comments from 12 diverse projects that exist on both Google App Store and GitHub. Our analysis led to a taxonomy of human-centric issues that characterises human-centric issues into three-high level categories: App Usage, Inclusiveness, and User Reaction. We then developed machine learning and deep learning models that are promising in automatically identifying and classifying human-centric issues from app reviews and developer discussions. A survey of mobile app developers shows that the automated detection of human-centric issues has practical applications. Guided by our findings, we highlight some implications and possible future work to further understand and better incorporate addressing human-centric issues into mobile app development.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
支持开发者解决移动应用中以人为中心的问题
在移动应用程序开发过程中,如果不考虑不同最终用户的特点、局限性和能力,可能会给最终用户带来问题,如可访问性和可用性问题。我们把这类问题称为以人为中心的问题。尽管这些问题很重要,但对最终用户遇到的、移动应用程序开发人员考虑到的以人为中心的问题类型的了解有限。在本文中,我们研究了最终用户通过谷歌应用商店评论报告的以人为中心的问题,GitHub上开发者讨论的主题是什么以人为中心问题,以及最终用户和开发者是否讨论了相同的以人为核心的问题。然后,我们研究自动化工具是否有助于检测这种以人为中心的问题,以及开发人员是否会发现这种工具有用。为此,我们进行了一项实证研究,从谷歌应用商店和GitHub上存在的12个不同项目中提取并手动分析了1200条应用评论和1200条问题评论的随机样本。我们的分析得出了以人为中心问题的分类法,将以人为中心的问题分为三个高级类别:应用程序使用、包容性和用户反应。然后,我们开发了机器学习和深度学习模型,这些模型有望从应用程序评论和开发者讨论中自动识别和分类以人为中心的问题。一项针对移动应用程序开发人员的调查显示,以人为中心的问题的自动检测具有实际应用。在我们的研究结果的指导下,我们强调了一些含义和未来可能的工作,以进一步理解并更好地将解决以人为中心的问题纳入移动应用程序开发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 工程技术-工程:电子与电气
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
10.80%
发文量
724
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering seeks contributions comprising well-defined theoretical results and empirical studies with potential impacts on software construction, analysis, or management. The scope of this Transactions extends from fundamental mechanisms to the development of principles and their application in specific environments. Specific topic areas include: a) Development and maintenance methods and models: Techniques and principles for specifying, designing, and implementing software systems, encompassing notations and process models. b) Assessment methods: Software tests, validation, reliability models, test and diagnosis procedures, software redundancy, design for error control, and measurements and evaluation of process and product aspects. c) Software project management: Productivity factors, cost models, schedule and organizational issues, and standards. d) Tools and environments: Specific tools, integrated tool environments, associated architectures, databases, and parallel and distributed processing issues. e) System issues: Hardware-software trade-offs. f) State-of-the-art surveys: Syntheses and comprehensive reviews of the historical development within specific areas of interest.
期刊最新文献
CVH-REC: A novel method for web API recommendation based on cross-view HGNNs Boosting Compiler Fault Localization: Getting the Best of Both Worlds by Fusing Dynamic and Historical Data Improving Gas Efficiency in Smart Contracts: Data-Driven Insights and LLM-Assisted Remediation Cost-Effective Adversarial Attacks Against Code LLM with Model Attention Toward Automated Validation of Language Model Synthesized Test Cases using Semantic Entropy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1