Power of partnerships

IF 1.8 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES International Journal of Health Governance Pub Date : 2019-11-21 DOI:10.1108/ijhg-06-2019-0045
F. Shroff, J. Minhas, Chris Laugen
{"title":"Power of partnerships","authors":"F. Shroff, J. Minhas, Chris Laugen","doi":"10.1108/ijhg-06-2019-0045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nMany low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) are struggling to reduce maternal mortality rates, despite increased efforts by the United Nations through the implementation of their Millennium Development Goals program. Industrialized nations, such as Canada, have a collaborative role to play in raising the global maternal health standards. The purpose of this paper is to propose policy approaches for Canadians and other Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) nations who wish to assist in reducing maternal mortality rates.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nTen Canadian health experts with experience in global maternal health were interviewed. Using qualitative analytical methods, the authors coded and themed their responses and paired them with peer-reviewed literature in this area to establish a model for improving global maternal health and survival rates.\n\n\nFindings\nFindings from this study indicated that maternal health may be improved by establishing a collaborative approach between interdisciplinary teams of health professionals (e.g. midwives, family physicians, OB/GYNs and nurses), literacy teachers, agriculturalists and community development professionals (e.g. humanitarians with diverse linguistic and cultural backgrounds). From this, a conceptual approach was devised for elevating the standard of maternal health. This approach includes specifications by which maternal health may be improved, such as gender justice, women’s literacy, freedom from violence against women, food and water security and healthcare accessibility. This model is based on community health center (CHC) models that integrate upstream changes with downstream services may be utilized by Canada and other OECD nations in efforts to enhance maternal health at home and abroad.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nMaternal mortality may be reduced by the adoption of a CHC model, an approach well suited for all nations regardless of economic status. Establishing such a model in LMICs would ideally establish long-term relationships between countries, such as Canada and the LMICs, where teams from supporting nations would collaborate with local Ministries of Health, non-government organizations as well as traditional birth attendants and healthcare professionals to reduce maternal mortality.\n\n\nPractical implications\nAll OECD Nations ought to donate 0.7 percent of their GDP toward international community development. These funds should break the tradition of “tied aid”, thereby removing profit motives, and genuinely contribute to the wellbeing of people in LMICs, particularly women, children and others who are vulnerable. The power of partnerships between people whose aims are genuinely focused on caring is truly transformative.\n\n\nSocial implications\nCanada is not a driver of global maternal mortality reduction work but has a responsibility to work in partnership with countries or regions in a humble and supportive role. Applying a comprehensive and interdisciplinary approach to reducing maternal mortality in the Global South includes adopting a CHC model: a community development approach to address social determinants of health and integrating various systems of evidence-informed healthcare with a commitment to social justice. Interdisciplinary teams would include literacy professionals, researchers, midwives, nurses, family physicians, OB/GYNs and community development professionals who specialize in anti-poverty work, mediation/dialogue and education campaigns that emphasize the value of all people regardless of their gender, ethnicity, religion and income. Diasporic Canadians are invaluable members of these teams due to their linguistic and cultural knowledge as well as their enthusiasm for working with their countries of origin. Establishment of long-term partnerships of 5–10 years between a Canadian team and a region or nation in the Global South that is dedicated to reducing maternal mortality and improving women’s health are valuable. Canada’s midwifery education programs are rated as world leaders so connecting midwives from Canada with those of the Global South will facilitate essential transfer of knowledge such as using birth plans and other evidence-based practices. Skilled attendants at the birth place will save women’s lives; in most cases, trained midwives are the most appropriate attendants. Video link to a primer about this paper by Dr Farah Shroff: https://maa.med.ubc.ca/videos-and-media/.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThere are virtually no retrievable articles that document why OECD nations ought to work with nations in the LMICs to improve maternal health. This paper outlines the reasons why it is important and explains how to do it well.\n","PeriodicalId":42859,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Health Governance","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/ijhg-06-2019-0045","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Health Governance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijhg-06-2019-0045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose Many low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) are struggling to reduce maternal mortality rates, despite increased efforts by the United Nations through the implementation of their Millennium Development Goals program. Industrialized nations, such as Canada, have a collaborative role to play in raising the global maternal health standards. The purpose of this paper is to propose policy approaches for Canadians and other Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) nations who wish to assist in reducing maternal mortality rates. Design/methodology/approach Ten Canadian health experts with experience in global maternal health were interviewed. Using qualitative analytical methods, the authors coded and themed their responses and paired them with peer-reviewed literature in this area to establish a model for improving global maternal health and survival rates. Findings Findings from this study indicated that maternal health may be improved by establishing a collaborative approach between interdisciplinary teams of health professionals (e.g. midwives, family physicians, OB/GYNs and nurses), literacy teachers, agriculturalists and community development professionals (e.g. humanitarians with diverse linguistic and cultural backgrounds). From this, a conceptual approach was devised for elevating the standard of maternal health. This approach includes specifications by which maternal health may be improved, such as gender justice, women’s literacy, freedom from violence against women, food and water security and healthcare accessibility. This model is based on community health center (CHC) models that integrate upstream changes with downstream services may be utilized by Canada and other OECD nations in efforts to enhance maternal health at home and abroad. Research limitations/implications Maternal mortality may be reduced by the adoption of a CHC model, an approach well suited for all nations regardless of economic status. Establishing such a model in LMICs would ideally establish long-term relationships between countries, such as Canada and the LMICs, where teams from supporting nations would collaborate with local Ministries of Health, non-government organizations as well as traditional birth attendants and healthcare professionals to reduce maternal mortality. Practical implications All OECD Nations ought to donate 0.7 percent of their GDP toward international community development. These funds should break the tradition of “tied aid”, thereby removing profit motives, and genuinely contribute to the wellbeing of people in LMICs, particularly women, children and others who are vulnerable. The power of partnerships between people whose aims are genuinely focused on caring is truly transformative. Social implications Canada is not a driver of global maternal mortality reduction work but has a responsibility to work in partnership with countries or regions in a humble and supportive role. Applying a comprehensive and interdisciplinary approach to reducing maternal mortality in the Global South includes adopting a CHC model: a community development approach to address social determinants of health and integrating various systems of evidence-informed healthcare with a commitment to social justice. Interdisciplinary teams would include literacy professionals, researchers, midwives, nurses, family physicians, OB/GYNs and community development professionals who specialize in anti-poverty work, mediation/dialogue and education campaigns that emphasize the value of all people regardless of their gender, ethnicity, religion and income. Diasporic Canadians are invaluable members of these teams due to their linguistic and cultural knowledge as well as their enthusiasm for working with their countries of origin. Establishment of long-term partnerships of 5–10 years between a Canadian team and a region or nation in the Global South that is dedicated to reducing maternal mortality and improving women’s health are valuable. Canada’s midwifery education programs are rated as world leaders so connecting midwives from Canada with those of the Global South will facilitate essential transfer of knowledge such as using birth plans and other evidence-based practices. Skilled attendants at the birth place will save women’s lives; in most cases, trained midwives are the most appropriate attendants. Video link to a primer about this paper by Dr Farah Shroff: https://maa.med.ubc.ca/videos-and-media/. Originality/value There are virtually no retrievable articles that document why OECD nations ought to work with nations in the LMICs to improve maternal health. This paper outlines the reasons why it is important and explains how to do it well.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
伙伴关系的力量
目的尽管联合国通过实施其千年发展目标计划加大了努力,但许多中低收入国家仍在努力降低孕产妇死亡率。加拿大等工业化国家在提高全球孕产妇健康标准方面可以发挥合作作用。本文的目的是为希望协助降低孕产妇死亡率的加拿大人和其他经济合作与发展组织(经合组织)国家提出政策方针。设计/方法/方法采访了十位在全球孕产妇健康方面有经验的加拿大卫生专家。作者使用定性分析方法,对他们的回答进行编码和主题化,并将其与该领域的同行评审文献配对,以建立一个改善全球孕产妇健康和存活率的模型。研究结果表明,通过在卫生专业人员(如助产士、家庭医生、妇产科医生和护士)、扫盲教师、农学家和社区发展专业人员(例如具有不同语言和文化背景的人道主义者)的跨学科团队之间建立合作方法,可以改善孕产妇健康。据此,制定了一种概念性方法来提高孕产妇健康标准。这种方法包括可以改善孕产妇健康的规范,如性别公正、妇女识字、免受暴力侵害妇女、粮食和水安全以及医疗保健的可及性。该模式基于社区卫生中心(CHC)模式,将上游变化与下游服务相结合,加拿大和其他经合组织国家可以利用该模式来加强国内外的孕产妇健康。研究局限性/影响采用CHC模式可以降低孕产妇死亡率,这种方法非常适合所有国家,无论其经济状况如何。在LMIC中建立这样的模式将理想地在加拿大和LMIC等国家之间建立长期关系,来自支持国家的团队将与当地卫生部、非政府组织以及传统助产士和医疗保健专业人员合作,以降低孕产妇死亡率。实际意义所有经合组织国家都应该将其国内生产总值的0.7%用于国际社会发展。这些资金应该打破“捆绑援助”的传统,从而消除盈利动机,真正为LMIC中的人们,特别是妇女、儿童和其他弱势群体的福祉做出贡献。真正以关爱为目标的人与人之间建立伙伴关系的力量是真正具有变革性的。社会影响加拿大不是全球孕产妇死亡率降低工作的推动者,但有责任与国家或地区合作,发挥谦逊和支持的作用。在全球南方采用综合和跨学科的方法来降低孕产妇死亡率,包括采用CHC模式:一种社区发展方法来解决健康的社会决定因素,并将各种基于证据的医疗保健系统与对社会正义的承诺相结合。跨学科团队将包括扫盲专业人员、研究人员、助产士、护士、家庭医生、妇产科医生和社区发展专业人员,他们专门从事反贫困工作、调解/对话和教育运动,强调所有人的价值,无论其性别、族裔、宗教和收入如何。由于他们的语言和文化知识以及与原籍国合作的热情,散居加拿大人是这些团队中宝贵的成员。加拿大团队与全球南方致力于降低孕产妇死亡率和改善妇女健康的地区或国家之间建立5-10年的长期伙伴关系是非常有价值的。加拿大的助产教育项目被评为世界领先者,因此将加拿大的助产士与全球南方的助产士联系起来,将有助于知识的重要转移,如使用生育计划和其他循证实践。出生地的熟练护理人员将挽救妇女的生命;在大多数情况下,受过培训的助产士是最合适的助产士。Farah Shroff博士关于这篇论文的入门教程的视频链接:https://maa.med.ubc.ca/videos-and-media/.Originality/valueThere几乎没有可检索的文章记录了为什么经合组织国家应该与LMIC中的国家合作来改善孕产妇健康。本文概述了它之所以重要,并解释了如何做好它。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Health Governance
International Journal of Health Governance HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
15.40%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: International Journal of Health Governance (IJHG) is oriented to serve those at the policy and governance levels within government, healthcare systems or healthcare organizations. It bridges the academic, public and private sectors, presenting case studies, research papers, reviews and viewpoints to provide an understanding of health governance that is both practical and actionable for practitioners, managers and policy makers. Policy and governance to promote, maintain or restore health extends beyond the clinical care aspect alone.
期刊最新文献
The response of regional general hospitals in Indonesia to COVID-19 Editorial: Time to treat the climate and nature crisis as one indivisible global health emergency IJHG review 28.4 Management of gallstone disease and chronic liver diseases during the COVID-19 outbreak in Ukraine: an ecological study Transforming food systems: a case of Eat Right India
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1