Approaches for combining data from multiple probability samples

Q3 Decision Sciences Statistical Journal of the IAOS Pub Date : 2022-12-24 DOI:10.3233/sji-220063
L. Dzikiti, M. D. Vieira, B. Girdler-Brown
{"title":"Approaches for combining data from multiple probability samples","authors":"L. Dzikiti, M. D. Vieira, B. Girdler-Brown","doi":"10.3233/sji-220063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Even though there is substantial literature on studies that pool survey data, it is still not clear which are the most efficient methodologies and sampling designs for combining data from different surveys. For example, it is important to know whether the estimates from the different surveys involved should be given equal weights in the calculation of the combined statistics or not. If they are not given equal importance, then it should be clear how they should be weighted and why. In this paper, current and proposed methods considered to combine survey data are evaluated through simulation, in the context of simple random sampling, stratified random sampling and two stage cluster random sampling from finite populations generated from a normal distribution super-population model. Simulation results suggest superpopulation variance does not influence the choice of weighting method. However, the population size appears to influence this choice. Combining samples improved the precision of estimates regardless of weighting method used for data collected under all considered sampling techniques, with stratified sampling being more precise than simple random sampling and two stage random cluster sampling.","PeriodicalId":55877,"journal":{"name":"Statistical Journal of the IAOS","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Statistical Journal of the IAOS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/sji-220063","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Decision Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Even though there is substantial literature on studies that pool survey data, it is still not clear which are the most efficient methodologies and sampling designs for combining data from different surveys. For example, it is important to know whether the estimates from the different surveys involved should be given equal weights in the calculation of the combined statistics or not. If they are not given equal importance, then it should be clear how they should be weighted and why. In this paper, current and proposed methods considered to combine survey data are evaluated through simulation, in the context of simple random sampling, stratified random sampling and two stage cluster random sampling from finite populations generated from a normal distribution super-population model. Simulation results suggest superpopulation variance does not influence the choice of weighting method. However, the population size appears to influence this choice. Combining samples improved the precision of estimates regardless of weighting method used for data collected under all considered sampling techniques, with stratified sampling being more precise than simple random sampling and two stage random cluster sampling.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
组合来自多个概率样本的数据的方法
尽管有大量关于汇集调查数据的研究文献,但仍不清楚哪种方法和抽样设计最有效,可以将不同调查的数据结合起来。例如,重要的是要知道,在计算综合统计数据时,所涉及的不同调查的估计数是否应该给予同等的权重。如果它们没有得到同等的重视,那么应该清楚它们应该如何加权以及为什么加权。在本文中,在正态分布超级种群模型产生的有限种群的简单随机抽样、分层随机抽样和两阶段聚类随机抽样的背景下,通过模拟评估了当前和拟议的结合调查数据的方法。仿真结果表明,超总体方差不影响加权方法的选择。然而,人口规模似乎影响了这一选择。无论在所有考虑的抽样技术下收集的数据使用何种加权方法,组合样本都提高了估计的精度,分层抽样比简单随机抽样和两阶段随机聚类抽样更精确。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Statistical Journal of the IAOS
Statistical Journal of the IAOS Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics and Econometrics
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
116
期刊介绍: This is the flagship journal of the International Association for Official Statistics and is expected to be widely circulated and subscribed to by individuals and institutions in all parts of the world. The main aim of the Journal is to support the IAOS mission by publishing articles to promote the understanding and advancement of official statistics and to foster the development of effective and efficient official statistical services on a global basis. Papers are expected to be of wide interest to readers. Such papers may or may not contain strictly original material. All papers are refereed.
期刊最新文献
‘Good data are used data’: Interview with Stefan Schweinfest1 Towards the 4th population census in Ethiopia: Some insights into the feasibility of the Post-Enumeration Survey Using machine learning algorithms to identify farms on the 2022 Census of Agriculture Food price inflation nowcasting and monitoring FAOSTAT Food Value Chain Domain implementation: Input Output modelling and analytical applications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1