Digital knowledge sharing: perspectives on use, impacts, risks, and best practices according to Native American and Indigenous community-based researchers
{"title":"Digital knowledge sharing: perspectives on use, impacts, risks, and best practices according to Native American and Indigenous community-based researchers","authors":"Diana E. Marsh","doi":"10.1007/s10502-021-09378-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Digital “returns” or “knowledge sharing”—the sharing of digital copies of archival collections with descendant Native and Indigenous communities—has become a key mode of broadening archival access while embracing community-driven curatorship and stewardship models. Yet, little is known about how the products of such programs—namely in the form of digital surrogates—are actually discovered, accessed, used, and circulated “on the ground” in Indigenous community contexts. This paper discusses a project that draws on qualitative interviews and ethnographic methods to fill this gap. I explore the uses and impacts of digitized collections from diverse community-based perspectives, taking the American Philosophical Society’s Digital Knowledge Sharing partnerships as a case study. Through semi-structured interviews with 36 participants and three site visits, the project documents Native community perspectives on the uses, meanings, and circulation of digitized collections in their home communities. I share major findings in eight categories: (1) <i>Barriers</i> to use and access; (2) <i>Circulation</i> of digital surrogate sharing; (3) <i>Formats</i> of digital copies (4) <i>Use</i> in wide-ranging community contexts (5) <i>Benefits</i> of digitization (6) <i>Limits</i> to digital affordances (7) <i>Risks</i> involved in digitization; and (8) <i>Best Practices</i> for archives going forward<i>.</i> This project provides insights for the broader professional communities in libraries, archives, and museums in order to develop best practices and policies for generating relevant and culturally sensitive digitization and digital sharing projects.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46131,"journal":{"name":"ARCHIVAL SCIENCE","volume":"23 1","pages":"81 - 115"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10502-021-09378-9.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ARCHIVAL SCIENCE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10502-021-09378-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Digital “returns” or “knowledge sharing”—the sharing of digital copies of archival collections with descendant Native and Indigenous communities—has become a key mode of broadening archival access while embracing community-driven curatorship and stewardship models. Yet, little is known about how the products of such programs—namely in the form of digital surrogates—are actually discovered, accessed, used, and circulated “on the ground” in Indigenous community contexts. This paper discusses a project that draws on qualitative interviews and ethnographic methods to fill this gap. I explore the uses and impacts of digitized collections from diverse community-based perspectives, taking the American Philosophical Society’s Digital Knowledge Sharing partnerships as a case study. Through semi-structured interviews with 36 participants and three site visits, the project documents Native community perspectives on the uses, meanings, and circulation of digitized collections in their home communities. I share major findings in eight categories: (1) Barriers to use and access; (2) Circulation of digital surrogate sharing; (3) Formats of digital copies (4) Use in wide-ranging community contexts (5) Benefits of digitization (6) Limits to digital affordances (7) Risks involved in digitization; and (8) Best Practices for archives going forward. This project provides insights for the broader professional communities in libraries, archives, and museums in order to develop best practices and policies for generating relevant and culturally sensitive digitization and digital sharing projects.
期刊介绍:
Archival Science promotes the development of archival science as an autonomous scientific discipline. The journal covers all aspects of archival science theory, methodology, and practice. Moreover, it investigates different cultural approaches to creation, management and provision of access to archives, records, and data. It also seeks to promote the exchange and comparison of concepts, views and attitudes related to recordkeeping issues around the world.Archival Science''s approach is integrated, interdisciplinary, and intercultural. Its scope encompasses the entire field of recorded process-related information, analyzed in terms of form, structure, and context. To meet its objectives, the journal draws from scientific disciplines that deal with the function of records and the way they are created, preserved, and retrieved; the context in which information is generated, managed, and used; and the social and cultural environment of records creation at different times and places.Covers all aspects of archival science theory, methodology, and practiceInvestigates different cultural approaches to creation, management and provision of access to archives, records, and dataPromotes the exchange and comparison of concepts, views, and attitudes related to recordkeeping issues around the worldAddresses the entire field of recorded process-related information, analyzed in terms of form, structure, and context