Miniature temperature data loggers increase precision and reduce bias when estimating the daily survival rate for bird nests

Pub Date : 2021-12-20 DOI:10.1111/jofo.12389
Matthew D. Stephenson, Lisa A. Schulte, Robert W. Klaver, Jarad Niemi
{"title":"Miniature temperature data loggers increase precision and reduce bias when estimating the daily survival rate for bird nests","authors":"Matthew D. Stephenson,&nbsp;Lisa A. Schulte,&nbsp;Robert W. Klaver,&nbsp;Jarad Niemi","doi":"10.1111/jofo.12389","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Demographic studies of many bird species are challenging because their nests are cryptic, resulting in few nests being found. To maximize statistical power, methods are needed that minimize disturbance while yielding as much information per nest as possible. One way to meet these objectives is to use miniature thermal data loggers to precisely date nest fates. Our objectives, therefore, were to (1) examine the possible effect of thermal data loggers on nest success through hatching by grass- and shrub-nesting songbirds that differed in their parasite egg-accepting and -rejecting behavior, (2) examine the effect of using daily temperature data versus less frequent nest-visit data on statistical power, bias, and precision when estimating the daily survival rate (DSR) for nests, and (3) compare these two approaches using a simulation study and field data. We monitored the survival of nests located in agricultural landscapes and used a binomial logistic regression with main effects for data-loggers and parasite-accepting or -rejecting status and their interaction. We also compared maximum likelihood–derived DSR for differences in estimated rates, precision, and sample sizes with both data collected in the field and simulated with varying sample sizes and visit frequencies. We found no evidence that thermal data loggers had any effect on hatching rates either for all species or for parasite egg-accepting and -rejecting species, separately. Both our simulation and analysis of real nest data indicated that use of data loggers increased the statistical power from each nest studied by increasing effective sample sizes and precision of DSR estimates compared to in-person visits. We also found a negative bias in DSR estimates with longer visit intervals, which use of data-loggers removed. Both the results of simulated- and field-data analyses suggest that future studies of nest survival can be improved by automated nest monitoring by removing a source of bias and providing more time to find additional nests.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jofo.12389","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jofo.12389","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Demographic studies of many bird species are challenging because their nests are cryptic, resulting in few nests being found. To maximize statistical power, methods are needed that minimize disturbance while yielding as much information per nest as possible. One way to meet these objectives is to use miniature thermal data loggers to precisely date nest fates. Our objectives, therefore, were to (1) examine the possible effect of thermal data loggers on nest success through hatching by grass- and shrub-nesting songbirds that differed in their parasite egg-accepting and -rejecting behavior, (2) examine the effect of using daily temperature data versus less frequent nest-visit data on statistical power, bias, and precision when estimating the daily survival rate (DSR) for nests, and (3) compare these two approaches using a simulation study and field data. We monitored the survival of nests located in agricultural landscapes and used a binomial logistic regression with main effects for data-loggers and parasite-accepting or -rejecting status and their interaction. We also compared maximum likelihood–derived DSR for differences in estimated rates, precision, and sample sizes with both data collected in the field and simulated with varying sample sizes and visit frequencies. We found no evidence that thermal data loggers had any effect on hatching rates either for all species or for parasite egg-accepting and -rejecting species, separately. Both our simulation and analysis of real nest data indicated that use of data loggers increased the statistical power from each nest studied by increasing effective sample sizes and precision of DSR estimates compared to in-person visits. We also found a negative bias in DSR estimates with longer visit intervals, which use of data-loggers removed. Both the results of simulated- and field-data analyses suggest that future studies of nest survival can be improved by automated nest monitoring by removing a source of bias and providing more time to find additional nests.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
微型温度数据记录仪在估计鸟巢的每日存活率时增加了精度并减少了偏差
对许多鸟类进行人口统计学研究是具有挑战性的,因为它们的巢穴是隐蔽的,导致很少有巢穴被发现。为了使统计能力最大化,需要使干扰最小化的方法,同时使每个巢产生尽可能多的信息。实现这些目标的一种方法是使用微型热数据记录仪来精确地确定巢的命运。因此,我们的目标是:(1)研究温度数据记录仪对不同接受和拒绝寄生虫卵行为的草巢和灌木巢鸣禽孵化成功的可能影响;(2)在估计巢的日存活率(DSR)时,研究使用每日温度数据与不太频繁的访巢数据对统计能力、偏差和精度的影响。(3)通过模拟研究和现场数据对两种方法进行比较。我们监测了位于农业景观中的巢穴的存活率,并使用二项逻辑回归,其主要影响因素是数据记录器和寄生虫接受或拒绝状态及其相互作用。我们还比较了最大似然衍生的DSR与现场收集的数据和不同样本量和访问频率的模拟数据在估计率、精度和样本量方面的差异。我们没有发现热数据记录仪对所有物种或接受和拒绝寄生虫卵的物种的孵化率有任何影响的证据。我们对真实巢穴数据的模拟和分析表明,与亲自访问相比,数据记录仪的使用增加了有效样本量和DSR估计的精度,从而提高了所研究的每个巢穴的统计能力。我们还发现在访问间隔较长的DSR估计中存在负偏差,使用数据记录器可以消除这种偏差。模拟和实地数据分析的结果都表明,通过消除偏见来源和提供更多时间来寻找额外的巢穴,自动化的巢穴监测可以改善未来的巢穴生存研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1