A Prospective Trial Determining the Relationship between Corneal Hysteresis, Corneal Corrected Intraocular Pressure, and Optical Coherence Tomography Parameters in Open Angle Glaucoma Suspects

Ian McWherter
{"title":"A Prospective Trial Determining the Relationship between Corneal Hysteresis, Corneal Corrected Intraocular Pressure, and Optical Coherence Tomography Parameters in Open Angle Glaucoma Suspects","authors":"Ian McWherter","doi":"10.24966/ocr-8887/100044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Glaucoma has been associated with low corneal hysteresis, a characteristic that may provide additional information in identifying those who are considered glaucoma suspects. The current study aimed to determine the relationship between corneal hysteresis, corneal compensated intraocular pressure, and GCC analysis in patients who are labeled clinically as open angle glaucoma suspects. Methods: Participants were categorized into 2 groups, control (n = 14) or suspect (n = 27), based on clinical examination. Corneal hysteresis and optical coherence tomography were performed and analyzed for any correlation between these two groups. Results: Correlations between corneal hysteresis and parapapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness or corneal hysteresis and ganglion cell complex thickness in the macula were weak to moderate and ranged from r = -0.340 to r = 0.316. The correlations between corneal compensated intraocular pressure and parapapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness or corneal compensated intraocular pressure and ganglion cell complex thickness were also weak to moderate and ranged from r = -0.489 to r = 0.396. Conclusion: In the current study, corneal hysteresis and corneal compensated intraocular pressure did not provide a definitive relationship when trying to identify patients as glaucoma suspects. The relationships between corneal hysteresis and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness or corneal hysteresis and ganglion cell complex thickness were weak to moderate. The weak to moderate correlation was consistent even when considering retinal nerve fiber layer and ganglion cell complex global indices as well as the individual clock hours for both measurements.","PeriodicalId":91268,"journal":{"name":"HSOA journal of ophthalmology & clinical research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HSOA journal of ophthalmology & clinical research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24966/ocr-8887/100044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Glaucoma has been associated with low corneal hysteresis, a characteristic that may provide additional information in identifying those who are considered glaucoma suspects. The current study aimed to determine the relationship between corneal hysteresis, corneal compensated intraocular pressure, and GCC analysis in patients who are labeled clinically as open angle glaucoma suspects. Methods: Participants were categorized into 2 groups, control (n = 14) or suspect (n = 27), based on clinical examination. Corneal hysteresis and optical coherence tomography were performed and analyzed for any correlation between these two groups. Results: Correlations between corneal hysteresis and parapapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness or corneal hysteresis and ganglion cell complex thickness in the macula were weak to moderate and ranged from r = -0.340 to r = 0.316. The correlations between corneal compensated intraocular pressure and parapapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness or corneal compensated intraocular pressure and ganglion cell complex thickness were also weak to moderate and ranged from r = -0.489 to r = 0.396. Conclusion: In the current study, corneal hysteresis and corneal compensated intraocular pressure did not provide a definitive relationship when trying to identify patients as glaucoma suspects. The relationships between corneal hysteresis and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness or corneal hysteresis and ganglion cell complex thickness were weak to moderate. The weak to moderate correlation was consistent even when considering retinal nerve fiber layer and ganglion cell complex global indices as well as the individual clock hours for both measurements.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一项前瞻性试验确定开角型青光眼可疑患者角膜迟滞、角膜矫正眼压和光学相干断层扫描参数之间的关系
背景:青光眼与低角膜滞后有关,这一特征可能为识别青光眼嫌疑人提供额外信息。目前的研究旨在确定临床上被标记为开角型青光眼可疑患者的角膜滞后、角膜补偿眼压和GCC分析之间的关系。方法:根据临床检查将参与者分为两组,对照组(n=14)或可疑组(n=27)。进行角膜迟滞和光学相干断层扫描,并分析这两组之间的任何相关性。结果:角膜迟滞与黄斑乳头旁视网膜神经纤维层厚度或角膜迟滞与神经节细胞复合体厚度之间的相关性为弱至中等,其范围为r=-0.340至r=0.316。角膜补偿眼压与乳头旁视网膜神经纤维层厚度或角膜补偿眼压和神经节细胞复合体厚度之间的相关性也很弱至中等,其范围为r=-0.489至r=0.396。结论:在目前的研究中,当试图将患者确定为青光眼嫌疑人时,角膜滞后和角膜补偿眼压并没有提供明确的关系。角膜滞后与视网膜神经纤维层厚度或角膜滞后与神经节细胞复合体厚度的关系为弱至中等。即使考虑到视网膜神经纤维层和神经节细胞复合体的整体指数以及两种测量的单个时钟小时,弱到中等的相关性也是一致的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Correlation between Clinical and Pathological Diagnosis of Eyelid Basal Cell Carcinoma Incomplete Enucleation of the Globe Secondary to Human Bite in a patient with Thyroid Eye Disease Willingness to Accept Keratorefractive Surgery and its Barriers among Myopes at Eye Foundation Hospital Group, Nigeria Eye Symptoms in Online Education, During Pandemic Period: A Cross Sectional Study Financial and Geographic Barriers in Seeking and Utilizing Eye Healthcare in Bangladesh
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1