A Model for Documenting Requirements Elicitation

IF 0.4 Q4 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Ingenieria Pub Date : 2023-05-23 DOI:10.14483/23448393.19411
E. Serna M., Alexei Serna A.
{"title":"A Model for Documenting Requirements Elicitation","authors":"E. Serna M., Alexei Serna A.","doi":"10.14483/23448393.19411","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Context: This work proposes a model to document the elicitation of requirements in the field of Requirements Engineering.\nMethod: A systematic review of the literature was conducted to determine the validity and effectiveness of the existing models for documenting requirements elicitation.\nResults: By analyzing the results of this review, it was concluded that it is possible – and that is required – to take the best documented practices and add principles from logic, abstraction, and formal methods to them in order to structure a semi-formal model for documenting elicitation. Those currently proposed focus on techniques to collect information and pay little attention to documentation. In addition, these models are mainly based on natural language, which makes their interpretation difficult, and they generate re-processing in later stages of the life cycle due to ambiguities.\nConclusions: This article describes a structured model, as well as its application and validation, by comparing it against five models found in the review.","PeriodicalId":41509,"journal":{"name":"Ingenieria","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ingenieria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14483/23448393.19411","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: This work proposes a model to document the elicitation of requirements in the field of Requirements Engineering. Method: A systematic review of the literature was conducted to determine the validity and effectiveness of the existing models for documenting requirements elicitation. Results: By analyzing the results of this review, it was concluded that it is possible – and that is required – to take the best documented practices and add principles from logic, abstraction, and formal methods to them in order to structure a semi-formal model for documenting elicitation. Those currently proposed focus on techniques to collect information and pay little attention to documentation. In addition, these models are mainly based on natural language, which makes their interpretation difficult, and they generate re-processing in later stages of the life cycle due to ambiguities. Conclusions: This article describes a structured model, as well as its application and validation, by comparing it against five models found in the review.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
记录需求引出的模型
背景:这项工作提出了一个在需求工程领域记录需求启发的模型。方法:对文献进行系统回顾,以确定现有的记录需求启发模型的有效性和有效性。结果:通过分析这篇综述的结果,得出的结论是,有可能——这是必要的——采用最佳记录实践,并将逻辑、抽象和形式化方法中的原则添加到其中,以构建一个用于记录启发的半形式化模型。目前提出的建议侧重于收集信息的技术,很少注意文件。此外,这些模型主要基于自然语言,这使得它们的解释变得困难,并且由于歧义,它们在生命周期的后期产生了重新处理。结论:本文通过将其与综述中发现的五个模型进行比较,描述了一个结构化模型及其应用和验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ingenieria
Ingenieria ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
25.00%
发文量
33
期刊最新文献
El fenómeno ENSO y la precipitación de la Zona Protectora Monte Alto, Costa Rica Caracterización y construcción de un molino de martillos compacto para uso de laboratorio para homogeneizar fibras naturales de Elaeis guineensis y Acrocomia sp. Waves Data in Costa Rica: Validating the WAVERYS Reanalysis using Waves Data Comparative Analysis of Boost and Hybrid Boost Converters Defending State-Feedback Based Controllers Against Sensor Attacks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1