{"title":"TOWARD A SUSTAINABLE US HEALTH CARE SYSTEM: POLICY IMPLICATIONS OF MARKET JUSTICE AND SOCIAL JUSTICE","authors":"Henry Eliassen","doi":"10.35782/jcpp.2021.3.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The COVID-19 pandemic and current projections of rising health expenditures point to an impending sustainability crisis in US health care institutions, torn between competing demands of individualistic values (marketjustice) and collective values (socialjustice). Champions of individual responsibility are likely to favor a disease management model of health care –wherein the maintenance of lucrative food, medical, and pharmaceutical industries depends in large part on the creation and reproduction of an older but sicker consumer base, with survival to old age contingent on individuals’capacity to pay for tests, treatments, and prescriptions. In contrast, proponents of community solidarity favor a health promotion model emphasizing primordial prevention — focused upstream on improvements in nutrition and in living and working conditions potentially capable of forestalling the onset of disease in the first place. In the end, health system sustainability will hinge on policy makers’ readiness to recognize, and innovate in response to, deeply ingrained values of both individual responsibility and community solidarity. To foster long-term stability in health care, effective policy must strive toward meeting the following essential needs: (1) optimal population health, (2) consumer and provider satisfaction, (3) fiscally stable and affordable funding sources, and (4) replacement opportunities for jobs lost to restructuring. © 2021. All Rights Reserved.","PeriodicalId":36161,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Community Positive Practices","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Community Positive Practices","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35782/jcpp.2021.3.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
走向可持续的美国医疗保健系统:市场公正和社会公正的政策含义
新冠肺炎大流行和目前对医疗支出上升的预测表明,美国医疗保健机构的可持续性危机迫在眉睫,在个人价值观(市场正义)和集体价值观(社会正义)的竞争需求之间左右为难。个人责任的拥护者可能倾向于医疗保健的疾病管理模式——在这种模式下,利润丰厚的食品、医疗和制药行业的维持在很大程度上取决于老年但病情更严重的消费者群体的创建和再生产,而活到老年取决于个人支付检测、治疗和处方费用的能力。相比之下,社区团结的支持者支持一种强调原始预防的健康促进模式——将重点放在上游,改善营养、生活和工作条件,这可能从一开始就能够预防疾病的发生。最终,卫生系统的可持续性将取决于决策者是否愿意承认并创新,以应对个人责任和社区团结这一根深蒂固的价值观。为了促进医疗保健的长期稳定,有效的政策必须努力满足以下基本需求:(1)最佳的人口健康,(2)消费者和提供者的满意度,(3)财政稳定和负担得起的资金来源,以及(4)因重组而失去的工作岗位的替代机会。©2021。保留所有权利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。