Small mammals killed in discarded bottles along roadsides in central Nebraska

Owen J. Johnson, Keith Geluso
{"title":"Small mammals killed in discarded bottles along roadsides in\ncentral Nebraska","authors":"Owen J. Johnson, Keith Geluso","doi":"10.32873/UNL.DC.TNAS.41.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Littered debris along roadways traps and kills small vertebrates. In Nebraska, at least 20 species of small mammals are small enough\nto enter openings of discarded bottles and cans. We surveyed roadsides for littered bottles and cans containing vertebrate remains\nin central parts of the state. We observed 459 bottles and 278 aluminum cans along 17.6 km of roadsides in Nebraska. Littered bottles\ncontained 41 vertebrate remains representing nine taxa of small mammals. Glass bottles contained the majority of individuals,\nplastic bottles had a few individuals, and no vertebrate remains were detected in aluminum cans. Harvest mice (Reithrodontomys\nspp.) were the most frequently observed taxa trapped in bottles, followed by short-tailed shrews (Blarina spp.). Remains of a juvenile\nHispid Cotton Rat (Sigmodon hispidus) in a glass bottle suggest that more species are at risk when individuals are young. Bottles\nwith openings higher than their base contained more vertebrates (21.1%) than those lying flat (3.8%) or those with openings\nfacing downward (1.2%). Overall, about 5.7% of bottles had vertebrate remains in Nebraska, which is slightly greater than studies\nin the eastern United States. Densities of littered bottles were much lower along roads in Nebraska than roadways in the eastern\nUnited States, resulting in fewer mortalities per km. Human population density appears associated with littered debris, thus numbers\nof vertebrates killed in these roadside hazards likely is greater in eastern Nebraska and near population centers where most of\nthe state’s population reside. In Nebraska, six species of small mammals are species of conservation need, and thus, at risk from littered\ndebris. Reduction and removal of litter along roadsides not only is aesthetically pleasing, but it can also reduce mortality of\nsmall mammals and other animals, such as small insects.","PeriodicalId":91981,"journal":{"name":"Transactions of the Nebraska Academy of Sciences and affiliated societies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transactions of the Nebraska Academy of Sciences and affiliated societies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32873/UNL.DC.TNAS.41.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Littered debris along roadways traps and kills small vertebrates. In Nebraska, at least 20 species of small mammals are small enough to enter openings of discarded bottles and cans. We surveyed roadsides for littered bottles and cans containing vertebrate remains in central parts of the state. We observed 459 bottles and 278 aluminum cans along 17.6 km of roadsides in Nebraska. Littered bottles contained 41 vertebrate remains representing nine taxa of small mammals. Glass bottles contained the majority of individuals, plastic bottles had a few individuals, and no vertebrate remains were detected in aluminum cans. Harvest mice (Reithrodontomys spp.) were the most frequently observed taxa trapped in bottles, followed by short-tailed shrews (Blarina spp.). Remains of a juvenile Hispid Cotton Rat (Sigmodon hispidus) in a glass bottle suggest that more species are at risk when individuals are young. Bottles with openings higher than their base contained more vertebrates (21.1%) than those lying flat (3.8%) or those with openings facing downward (1.2%). Overall, about 5.7% of bottles had vertebrate remains in Nebraska, which is slightly greater than studies in the eastern United States. Densities of littered bottles were much lower along roads in Nebraska than roadways in the eastern United States, resulting in fewer mortalities per km. Human population density appears associated with littered debris, thus numbers of vertebrates killed in these roadside hazards likely is greater in eastern Nebraska and near population centers where most of the state’s population reside. In Nebraska, six species of small mammals are species of conservation need, and thus, at risk from littered debris. Reduction and removal of litter along roadsides not only is aesthetically pleasing, but it can also reduce mortality of small mammals and other animals, such as small insects.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
内布拉斯加州燃烧的路边丢弃的瓶子里杀死了小型哺乳动物
道路上散落的碎片困住并杀死了小型脊椎动物。在内布拉斯加州,至少有20种小型哺乳动物足够小,可以进入废弃的瓶子和罐子的开口。我们调查了该州中部路边散落的装有脊椎动物残留物的瓶子和罐子。我们在内布拉斯加州17.6公里的路边观察到459个瓶子和278个铝罐。丢弃的瓶子里有41具脊椎动物遗骸,代表了9个小型哺乳动物分类群。玻璃瓶容纳了大多数个体,塑料瓶容纳了少数个体,在铝罐中没有检测到脊椎动物的遗骸。收获鼠(Reithrodontomysspp.)是最常见的被困在瓶子里的分类群,其次是短尾鼩(Blarina spp.)。玻璃瓶里的幼年Hispid棉鼠(Sigmodon hispidus)的残骸表明,当个体年轻时,更多的物种面临风险。开口高于底座的瓶子(21.1%)比平躺的瓶子(3.8%)或开口朝下的瓶子(1.2%)含有更多的脊椎动物。总体而言,内布拉斯加州约有5.7%的瓶子有脊椎动物遗骸,这一数字略高于美国东部的研究。内布拉斯加州道路上散落瓶子的密度远低于美国东部的道路,导致每公里的死亡人数减少。人口密度似乎与散落的碎片有关,因此在内布拉斯加州东部和大多数人口居住的人口中心附近,死于这些路边危险的脊椎动物数量可能更多。在内布拉斯加州,有六种小型哺乳动物是需要保护的物种,因此面临着被乱扔垃圾的风险。减少和清除路边的垃圾不仅美观,还可以降低小型哺乳动物和其他动物(如小型昆虫)的死亡率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Potential hybridization among two species of California Salvia Pleistocene Bats (Late Irvingtonian and Late Rancholabrean) from Nuckolls and Sherman Counties, Nebraska Two New Absolute Gravity Base Stations Established in Lincoln, NE Westward expansion of the Evening Bat (Nycticeius humeralis) into Dawson and Lincoln counties of central Nebraska The Southern Flying Squirrel (Glaucomys volans) in Lincoln, Nebraska
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1